Highlanders v Chiefs
-
Ok who picked the canes to top the NZ conference??<br><br>
As it currently stands. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="597268" data-time="1468660590">
<div>
<p>I didn't think it went forward at all anyway, whether knocked out by the Chiefs player or not.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yup all academic - went back regardless. Clear try.</p> -
25-15
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="597268" data-time="1468660590">
<div>
<p>I didn't think it went forward at all anyway, whether knocked out by the Chiefs player or not.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Totally agree. Looked to be knocked back out of the Highlanders hands.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Unco" data-cid="597262" data-time="1468660502"><p>If it's knocked out, it's a knock on. That's always been the ruling.</p></blockquote><br>
Ruled that way when I was a kid and in 2015....but it's a coin toss in 2016 -
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="597268" data-time="1468660590">
<div>
<p>I didn't think it went forward at all anyway, whether knocked out by the Chiefs player or not.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I would like to give the benefit of the doubt against the player carrying the ball, whether it went forward or backwards. The main thing is you lost control of the ball, but I understand how others might see it differently</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Mattasaurus" data-cid="597278" data-time="1468660654">
<div>
<p>Ruled that way when I was a kid and in 2015....but it's a coin toss in 2016</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah, like in the RWC final when SBW was punching the ball out of the Aussies hands. Still a knock on.</p> -
Right, no more points please.
-
early shower for naholo
-
Great cover defence by highlanders