Waratahs v Chiefs
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="583439" data-time="1464401140">
<div>
<p>NTA?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Hodor's little brother - Opdor.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Let's see whether Toddy's men are good enough to walk through.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Toddy" data-cid="583454" data-time="1464406920"><p>
Better to try and hold the guy on the deck, rather than let him pick his next victim to choke and DDT. 😉</p></blockquote>
<br>
Kind of like a citizens arrest. -
-
-
<p>Watched game in full now. The execution was a little off in places, but the Tahs - to a man - turned up physically and just bossed the shit out of the Chiefs.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Some of the passing in the third quarter, where the game was basically won, is almost shockingly good to an Aussie rugby fan. A fair few Kiwis* would have to grudgingly admire some of the leadup work of the Tahs, and the Chiefs also had some fucking quick hands go on.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>That was a good game of footy. Everything about it was competitive though, as I said earlier, the Chiefs were just going wide while the Tahs were heading up the fat man's track. Contrast of styles, but both were fairly effective.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>What I think a few Tahs fans have forgotten (including me) is some missing players like Leith and Ngatai who were pretty handy. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>As for the Cane haters: what the fuck have you been drinking? He was in everything, and toward the end missed a couple of tackles because half of your forwards went missing. Brodie who? Barely sighted. The young bloke playing 8 was so busy chasing Tahs' linebreaks he barely saw any ball, and then your hooker is seagulling out on the wing trying to be Dane Coles or something, when he should have been doing more of his good work in close.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They'll be shitty that they went into the mid-season break like that, and come out firing after.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:10px;">* Cantabs, naturally, are excluded from this statement. Firstly, they don't consider themselves Kiwis unless there are minimum 50% of AB squad as Cantabs. Secondly, they're miserable fluffybunnies in general, who never support anyone but themselves.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:10px;">:whistle:</span></p> -
<p>I liked your post NTA but I'm unsure how you noticed Cane and missed Brodie - he's the big lunk who was doing a bunch of work.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I must say I didn't get much enjoyment from the Tahs interpassing etc on the night but it was good rugby to watch on the replay. Why the hell did they pick this game to start playing like a functioning team?</p> -
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="583681" data-time="1464481867">
<div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:10px;">* Cantabs, naturally, are excluded from this statement. Firstly, they don't consider themselves Kiwis unless there are minimum 50% of AB squad as Cantabs. Secondly, they're miserable fluffybunnys in general, who never support anyone but themselves.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:10px;"> :whistle:</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Yes - due to injuries only 33% of that Chiefs' squad should be Crusaders, so they don't make the support threshold! :)</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Nepia" data-cid="583685" data-time="1464482435">
<div>
<p>I liked your post NTA but I'm unsure how you noticed Cane and missed Brodie - he's the big lunk who was doing a bunch of work.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Usually you see him running around with the pill and smashing blokes. It wasn't a very Brodie game from Brodie, IMHO. He might have been doing the dirty work, but then so must every other forward out there. The point is, they didn't really free up any of their fellow rugby players, trying instead to leave it to the backs (who it must be said, did good work, but aren't forwards).</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SammyC" data-cid="583696" data-time="1464484876">
<div>
<p>Doesn't matter what thread, one of the usual suspects will have a dig at the cantabs</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Because its fun and easy ;)</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SammyC" data-cid="583696" data-time="1464484876">
<div>
<p>NTA, remember 1 week ago when we made Skelton, Hoopah etc look like a bunch of pussy cats?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Yep. And that's the big fucking mystery for me - we started like a shot Friday night. We started like a shit the Friday night before.</p> -
Yea not all Cantabs are anti Chiefs. Look for example at how the most one eyed Cantab of recent years Steve Hansen has just chosen the Chiefs backline for the ABs...indicating he's a big fan of that positive attacking brand of rugby the Chiefs produce.<br><br>And what better wingers than Savea and Naholo to put the finishing touches to some of that mooloo magic conjured up by Cruden and Ngatai...<br><br>Of course Dave Rennie needs to be credited with turning the Chiefs into one of the greatest teams in world rugby...benefiting the ABs in the process and a great pity we are going to lose one of NZ's most awesome coaches next year by the sounds of it.
-
<p>The Tahs were over physical in the rucks and Mr Peyper should have penalized them two or three times when they dived like men possessed on Chiefs players lying on the ground. That was intimidation and it worked. But Peyper is a South African and it is how rugby is played in Boer land.</p>
-
Wheres all this Cantab and Cane hoohah come from? <br><br>
So KiwiMurph, a diehard Orc and Blues supporter said Cane was quiet. I agreed with his post and then all of a sudden all Cantabs hate Cane. Classic fern. <br><br>
Cane's an exceptional player. Still has things to work on - eg running game. It's going to be great to see how things go with him and Savea over possibly the next 10 years! -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="cgrant" data-cid="583778" data-time="1464516177">
<div>
<p>The Tahs were over physical in the rucks and Mr Peyper should have penalized them two or three times when they dived like men possessed on Chiefs players lying on the ground. That was intimidation and it worked. But Peyper is a South African and it is how rugby is played in Boer land.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Very first ruck Cane had a forearm rubbed over his face. Lots of sly stuff aimed in the rucks and was obviously a tactic used by the Tahs to unsettle the Chiefs or try and distract them.</p>
<p>Tamanivalu especially spent a while chasing people for revenge and looking like he was ruck chasing to get an opportunity rather than sticking to pattern.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crucial" data-cid="583985" data-time="1464581091">
<div>
<p>Very first ruck Cane had a forearm rubbed over his face. Lots of sly stuff aimed in the rucks and was obviously a tactic used by the Tahs to unsettle the Chiefs or try and distract them.</p>
<p>Tamanivalu especially spent a while chasing people for revenge and looking like he was ruck chasing to get an opportunity rather than sticking to pattern.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> Yes, that was deliberate, of course. Palu should have been yellow carded far earlier.</p> -
<p>Unsurprisingly I don't have an issue with the niggle as long as it's not well off the ball or dirty (squirrel gripping, fish hooking etc.). It's about asserting yourself. It was an obvious ploy that worked. It may also have been unnecessary given how we won the collisions and made good yardage around the ruck.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It's not tiddlywinks. All teams do it at some point and predominately because it works. The secret is to be patient in metering out your revenge. If the opportunity doesn't come, concentrate on getting the points which frustrates teams into more niggle.</p> -
<p>winning the game is the ultimate revenge </p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="584022" data-time="1464588921"><p>Unsurprisingly I don't have an issue with the niggle as long as it's not well off the ball or dirty (squirrel gripping, fish hooking etc.). It's about asserting yourself. It was an obvious ploy that worked. It may also have been unnecessary given how we won the collisions and made good yardage around the ruck.<br><br>
It's not tiddlywinks. All teams do it at some point and predominately because it works. The secret is to be patient in metering out your revenge. If the opportunity doesn't come, concentrate on getting the points which frustrates teams into more niggle.</p></blockquote>
Agree, but try telling that to the Janguares after the weekend!
