Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series
-
-
@Chris-B said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@MN5 Probably Turner and Wright.
Wright got better and better as he got older. He averaged around 45 for the second half of his career and well over 50 for the final quarter.
Yeah, will be interesting where Latham ends up.
Perhaps the captaincy will be the making of him and he’ll have a late career surge !
-
-
@canefan said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
Good way for Southee to retire with a test average under 30 I guess.
I thought I heard on the radio report that he still hopes to play despite stepping aside?
Tell him he's dreaming!
Actually, I don't mind if Tim stays in the wings and gets another couple of tests if injuries strike - but, there's no way he should be playing ahead of Matt Henry - and really, not Ben Sears either. Nor Jamo when he comes back.
Playing four seamers in NZ, Tim might still get a run.
-
@Chris-B said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@canefan said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
Good way for Southee to retire with a test average under 30 I guess.
I thought I heard on the radio report that he still hopes to play despite stepping aside?
Tell him he's dreaming!
Actually, I don't mind if Tim stays in the wings and gets another couple of tests if injuries strike - but, there's no way he should be playing ahead of Matt Henry - and really, not Ben Sears either. Nor Jamo when he comes back.
Playing four seamers in NZ, Tim might still get a run.
Yeah right now Southee is a probable victim of the “let’s find the three least shit spinners in NZ and hope they don’t completely suck” selection policy of playing in the subcontinent. Back in NZ he’ll get a run, particularly for “experience” as I have a feeling Jamieson will still be broken.
In the next three tests it might mean a reprieve for Santner given Henry could come in as a straight swap for Southee ( as he should ) and they point to Santners useful batting in the last test despite being ineffective in the first test in all facets of the game.
Then again Phillips is doing the Santner role better than Santner.
So that leaves room for a wicket taking spinner to be selected ( awaits shrills of laughter )
-
@canefan said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@nzzp said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
Preach, Dylan Cleaver
The Black Caps have, in the space of the decade, gone from one of the most innovative and nimble high-performance programmes in the world, to one that is utterly predictable. It is also one that is unsheltered and vulnerable to the global winds of change in cricket.
Stead dined out on the best group of talent we've ever had, and did little to identify and prepare the next group to take over. Probably not helped by administration and high performance talent development in NZC. Sounds like another code I know...
Do we blame him or are the next wave of guys just not really good enough ?
New Zealand have ( had ) what I’d consider just TWO genuine all time legends of the game. I’m sure I don’t need to mention their names here.
England/Australia/West Indies/India would have had maybe 15-20 guys at that level.
SA/Pakistan perhaps 10-15 each ?
Sri Lanka ? I could name three.
Other test playing nations probably none.
Maybe we just need to accept the natural order of things at test level at the moment.
-
@Donsteppa yeah I was responding to posts about in our lifetimes so ignored Cowie.
It reflects our standing in the game. Hadlee and maybe Bond would get a mention in any sides discussion. Boult and Wagner - whoever. Not so much.
An all time NZ side would do ok against any opposition as you only have 11 on the field. By the time you get to our 3rd XI we are fucking toast. To be fair probably our seconds
-
@dogmeat said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@Donsteppa yeah I was responding to posts about in our lifetimes so ignored Cowie.
It reflects our standing in the game. Hadlee and maybe Bond would get a mention in any sides discussion. Boult and Wagner - whoever. Not so much.
An all time NZ side would do ok against any opposition as you only have 11 on the field. By the time you get to our 3rd XI we are fucking toast. To be fair probably our seconds
No chance.
Well actually Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe and India would be keen. Everyone else has class fast bowlers that didn’t break all the time
-
-
@reprobate said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@MN5 if it's an imaginary team then you can just imagine him uninjured.
In that case I’ll imagine Astle always gets 222, he’ll be first name on the sheet
What a knock, I saw every ball
-
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
Do we blame him or are the next wave of guys just not really good enough ?
It's hard to know when not enough young players get enough of a crack
We keep rolling out these old players
O'Rourke looks with sticking with
Ravindra looks worth persevering with
How about giving other young players a chance?
-
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@canefan said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@nzzp said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
Preach, Dylan Cleaver
The Black Caps have, in the space of the decade, gone from one of the most innovative and nimble high-performance programmes in the world, to one that is utterly predictable. It is also one that is unsheltered and vulnerable to the global winds of change in cricket.
Stead dined out on the best group of talent we've ever had, and did little to identify and prepare the next group to take over. Probably not helped by administration and high performance talent development in NZC. Sounds like another code I know...
Do we blame him or are the next wave of guys just not really good enough ?
New Zealand have ( had ) what I’d consider just TWO genuine all time legends of the game. I’m sure I don’t need to mention their names here.
England/Australia/West Indies/India would have had maybe 15-20 guys at that level.
SA/Pakistan perhaps 10-15 each ?
Sri Lanka ? I could name three.
Other test playing nations probably none.
Maybe we just need to accept the natural order of things at test level at the moment.
As with the 2015 ABs, Kane's peak team have ruined our expectations for the foreseeable future
-
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
The ten year old cricketer in the house is still bemused at one team scoring 602/5, and the other only 88 in reply.
That thought is not age restricted, it is however indicative of a lack of Black caps supporter experience.
-
@Snowy said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
The ten year old cricketer in the house is still bemused at one team scoring 602/5, and the other only 88 in reply.
That thought is not age restricted, it is however indicative of a lack of Black caps supporter experience.
It was a parenting moment where I realised an early life WTC win may not have shown normal service as a Black Caps fan... (Luckily he'd spent most of the Bay Oval loss to Bangladesh playing cricket on the bank instead of watching
)A bit like those of us that experienced the mid-late 80's as our first NZ cricketing experience, and just assumed it was normal service until...
-
@Donsteppa He must have wondered why his Dad was always hiding behind a sofa whenever the cricket was on though...
TBH raising a child as a caps fan is bordering on abuse, look how we turned out. Years of unsuccessfully seeking emotional support on an internet forum is ahead of him.
-
@Snowy said in Black Caps v Sri Lanka Test Series:
@Donsteppa He must have wondered why his Dad was always hiding behind a sofa whenever the cricket was on though...
TBH raising a child as a caps fan is bordering on abuse, look how we turned out. Years of unsuccessfully seeking emotional support on an internet forum is ahead of him.
all that said, the Caps have brought me more joy than the ABs. I expect the ABs to win, so the 'joy' bar is high. I'm pleasantly surprised when the Craps get up in a Test ... so every single one gets celebrated. Quite different expectations ... although maybe they should be more similar
-
-
I grew up watching them in the mid 90s, where we just got our arses handed to us by all and sundry, so this recent success has been extremely enjoyable. I can remember being happy when we didn't avoid a follow on and got to bat again, as watching Bryan Young maybe get a 50 was a lot better than watching our pop gun attack getting ground into the dust conceding 600/3.
-
On Stead, he was very much the right man at the right time when he took over. With Baz and Hess laying the ground work for our golden generation to excel, we just needed a steady hand to continue that on. He has had some wonderful results, but medium to long term, as some of our greats like Rosco and BJ retired, the Stead/Kane combination was never going to cut it as we needed to keep innovating and evolving with the new players coming in. Basically we have become far too conservative when in reality we need to be throwing caution to the wind a bit to put some of the top sides under more pressure. Resigning Stead to mid 2025 was very short sighted, that was the perfect chance to shake things up a bit but instead we've seen the decline continue.
-
The comments about our decline - golden ages etc prompted me to crunch some numbers
Surprisingly the current decade is, to date, our winningest ever. Although given we've lost our last 4 tests and are about to face India away that's set to change.
Three things stick out to me
How much more cricket we play since about the 90's, how many more wins we gather and the ongoing decline in drawn tests.
All are good trends. Plus our golden age of the 80's wasn't really all that golden. Winning 1-4 is pretty poor by modern standards although we were tough to beat. That's as I remember it. Helped by some doctored pitches at home. Either very green or roads depending on who we were facing.
Man the 90's were shite though.
