England to whitewash Australia
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="591909" data-time="1466896055">
<div>
<p>Kick is knee or below. Which makes thigh a weird kind of no man's land :think:</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>In many different cultures.</p> -
<p>Fun game to watch - back and forth - if that was a decider it would have been epic, it did have a bit of a dead rubber feel.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Wallabies were better but in addition to their weaknesses (e.g. lineout/unbalanced forward pack, field kicking) they shoot themselves in the foot, soft needless penalties and soft mistakes (Phipps pass to Folau's ankle).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On the other hand England have great winning confidence - they've now won 9 on the trot if you count the Welsh warm up game? - they are composed and have belief in what they are doing so stick to the task and again come out with the win. </p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="barbarian" data-cid="591899" data-time="1466892133">
<div>
<p>I think what it shows it the margins in top level rugby are fine.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You take Giteau, Douglas, Beale, AAC and Pocock out of our World Cup team, and we fall back a peg or two. And you add Itoje, Vunipola, Kruis, Hartley and a renewed Haskall to England (as well as better coaching) and they rise about five pegs.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I genuinely believe this was a close series, and it each game rested on 2-3 big plays. England deservedly stepped up in those moments, and that's those fine margins. In the RWC it was us stepping up.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I like our game plan. In attack it worked tonight, it worked bloody well. Was just our defence and discipline in our own half that killed us.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Discipline particularly. Farrel's stats are amazing - he must be the best kicker in the world at the moment and the difference in score was attributable to his ability to punish errors.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I agree that Giteau or Beale would have made a big difference to the structure of the attack in the backs.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I still don't understand what Chieka was thinking taking Toomua off the field. Nor what he's trying at number eight.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Still, regardless of the closeness of scores, a clean-sweep in a three test series is telling.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Disgusted of TW" data-cid="591776" data-time="1466856454">
<div>
<p>I'm happy to kick that can down the road. If Eddie can deliver a big Autumn series and a second 6N (by no means a given), a big group of battle hardened English will get to test themselves in NZ with the Lions. Then, but not before, England should be ready to take on the ABs.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>There is two angles to that ,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>While im sure England should get better , </p>
<p> </p>
<p>NZ are rebuilding right now , im not sure if vulnerable is the right word , but they are re structuring and undecided on their best team, </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Im expecting in 12 months time they will be far more settled and cohesive , so it could be well be , they are there for the taking more so now than they will be later </p> -
<p>It's very much looking like England will have a good chance to improve over the next couple of years. We've had good results but have to recognise that we've ridden our luck at times. We're not world beaters as yet. The level of improvement has been impressive, although coming from a low (RWC) base in terms of results more than performance in general. It's a bright time to be an England fan but until we can beat the other top teams regularly then we have no bragging rights.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>NZ are, as Kiwinmelb says, in a astute of rebuilding. Not such an issue because the succession planning that Hansen and co have put in place means that they can lose four world class players and leaders and hardly break stride. Very impressive. NZ will inevitably get better as the newer combos are cemented and then gel. England have the greater level of improvement to aim for, which makes the next couple of years potentially very interesting but the thing is, will they achieve the level of improvement that we hope they are capable of? That, to me is less likely than the lower degree of improvement that NZ have due to their higher starting level.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Easy to talk of all this but no so easy to achieve. But as I say a bright time for England after many dark years.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pakman" data-cid="592082" data-time="1466965071">
<div>
<p>Has any team previously scored 40 points in a top tier test and LOST?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>2000 NZ v South Africa, 40-46</p>
<p> </p>
<p>2004 Wales v Argentina, 44-50</p> -
That Fijian winger is so fat! Has he been playing in Top14 or something?
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Immenso Rapido" data-cid="592103" data-time="1466976858"><p>That Fijian winger is so fat! Has he been playing in Top14 or something?</p></blockquote>
Scotland I think. And he was bigger when he landed I'm told. <br><br>
Need that extra coat to play oop north -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="592094" data-time="1466973668"><p>
It's very much looking like England will have a good chance to improve over the next couple of years. We've had good results but have to recognise that we've ridden our luck at times. We're not world beaters as yet. The level of improvement has been impressive, although coming from a low (RWC) base in terms of results more than performance in general. It's a bright time to be an England fan but until we can beat the other top teams regularly then we have no bragging rights.<br><br>
NZ are, as Kiwinmelb says, in a astute of rebuilding. Not such an issue because the succession planning that Hansen and co have put in place means that they can lose four world class players and leaders and hardly break stride. Very impressive. NZ will inevitably get better as the newer combos are cemented and then gel. England have the greater level of improvement to aim for, which makes the next couple of years potentially very interesting but the thing is, will they achieve the level of improvement that we hope they are capable of? That, to me is less likely than the lower degree of improvement that NZ have due to their higher starting level.<br><br>
Easy to talk of all this but no so easy to achieve. But as I say a bright time for England after many dark years.</p></blockquote>. <br><br>
End of the day , you get us at twickenham next , <br><br>
That becomes more of a Toss a coin game than most kiwis will acknowledge with the way you are playing IMO . <br><br>
I would have us as much stronger favourites at home though . -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="592094" data-time="1466973668"><p>
It's very much looking like England will have a good chance to improve over the next couple of years. We've had good results but have to recognise that we've ridden our luck at times. We're not world beaters as yet. The level of improvement has been impressive, although coming from a low (RWC) base in terms of results more than performance in general. It's a bright time to be an England fan but until we can beat the other top teams regularly then we have no bragging rights.<br><br>
NZ are, as Kiwinmelb says, in a astute of rebuilding. Not such an issue because the succession planning that Hansen and co have put in place means that they can lose four world class players and leaders and hardly break stride. Very impressive. NZ will inevitably get better as the newer combos are cemented and then gel. England have the greater level of improvement to aim for, which makes the next couple of years potentially very interesting but the thing is, will they achieve the level of improvement that we hope they are capable of? That, to me is less likely than the lower degree of improvement that NZ have due to their higher starting level.<br><br>
Easy to talk of all this but no so easy to achieve. But as I say a bright time for England after many dark years.</p></blockquote>. <br><br>
End of the day , you get us at twickenham next , <br><br>
That becomes more of a Toss a coin game than most kiwis will acknowledge with the way you are playing IMO . <br><br>
I would have us as much stronger favourites at home though . -
<p>Holy fuck Nick, G&G must make you tear your hair out (oh...)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>lose 0-3 at home to England, changes that MUST be made. Get Quade in. Bring in a new winger. Replace Palu with, um, someone!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Are you guys really so happy with Pocock at 8 that he walks back in there when he's fit? Or is it just you have no one else? (that you are willing to try)</p> -
<br><br><blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="592150" data-time="1466986241"><p>Holy fuck Nick, G&G must make you tear your hair out (oh...)<br></p></blockquote>
<br><br>
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaa funny fluffybunny.<br><br>
It's been great over there. Such a cavalcade of fuckwits. There are some people who clearly don't know what rugby looks like. <br><br>
The best one was the call for Foley at 13. Gold. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="592150" data-time="1466986241">
<div>
<p>Holy fuck Nick, G&G must make you tear your hair out (oh...)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>lose 0-3 at home to England, changes that MUST be made. Get Quade in. Bring in a new winger. Replace Palu with, um, someone!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Are you guys really so happy with Pocock at 8 that he walks back in there when he's fit? Or is it just you have no one else? (that you are willing to try)</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Pocock has to be in the team somewhere, Australia wins a lot more often when he is playing</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SammyC" data-cid="592161" data-time="1466986979"><p>Pocock has to be in the team somewhere, Australia wins a lot more often when he is playing</p></blockquote>
Fardy hit more rucks than anyone on Saturday. <br>
Hooper's form is irresistible. <br>
We need an 8 and McMahon was pretty good on Saturday.<br><br>
Where to fit Pocock? -
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/81150196/Wallabies-v-England-Numbers-show-Australia-doesn-t-cope-without-David-Pocock'>http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/81150196/Wallabies-v-England-Numbers-show-Australia-doesn-t-cope-without-David-Pocock</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Fardy may have hit more rucks, but I didn't think he was that effective.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And is hoopers form irresistable? First thing a Blind side flanker should know, if the 8 runs blind off the scrum, it's his man.</p>
