England to whitewash Australia
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Chris B." data-cid="586696" data-time="1465650272"><p>He should be banned from the sideline for a week for that effort.</p></blockquote>
Tough call who to cheer for if him and Brown come to blows. <br><br>
Fardy was off his game huh, gave away a few pens just by being dumb, he's usually a bit smarter at the breakdown. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="586693" data-time="1465650036"><p>Very pleased with that - unsurprisingly. A win in Aus for us is rare and to put more points on them than the 2003 team is great too. However at no time did I feel comfortable until we got the turnover in the last minute. The try after that was just window dressing. Aus looked so bloody dangerous and every time Folau got the ball in anything that looked like space I was thinking about how to empty my colostomy bag.<br><br>
A big call from Mr Percentage to take of Burrell but our defensive pattern looked better straight away.<br><br>
Nathan Grey remains a complete cock.</p></blockquote>
Christ, do you think Burrell was yanked? I assumed he had a knock.<br><br>
Agree that we were much better without him though.<br><br>
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk -
The forwards really fronted for England. Was actually good to watch. Haskell's best game in white IMO. <br><br>
There were as predicted, issues with the attack. Limited opportunities to put Yarde in space. But I did like that they tried to keep the ball alive more. Hopefully it is a sign of things to come under Steady. <br><br><br>
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
<p>What an awesome game. Well done England, and all the Poms on here... ya jammy bastards!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It's going to be a great series. England bashed us up in the middle 40 minutes and dictated the pace of the game. It was great to watch.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm confident we can level the series next week, just need to iron out a few kinks. We created more than enough scoring chances, just need to defend better (and smarter).</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Pot Hale" data-cid="586657" data-time="1465646299">
<div>
<p>39 points against Australia at home by a NH team.<br><br>
Is that a first?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I think that is the most ever conceded by us at Suncorp/Lang Park. First time the Poms have ever won in Brisbane. Highest total the Poms have ever scored against us.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>So it would have to be close.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SimonAdd" data-cid="586706" data-time="1465651220">
<div>
<p>Christ, do you think Burrell was yanked? I assumed he had a knock.<br><br>
Agree that we were much better without him though.<br><br>
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>That's my understanding. Harsh on Burrell who rarely lets us down but I'm just not so sure he fits in with what Jones is after. I also like the idea of two playmakers. Whether that is to be Ford and Farrell or not Im not sure.</p> -
<p>Thanks Sparky. Don't want to get carried away though.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I mean it was only Australia. :fishing:</p> -
did not see the game and obviously he kicks and tackles but is Farrell really a playmaker? perhaps he learnt sonething from the RWC,,<br>
nb love the Eddie mindgame comments prematch that his old buddy Cheika is world's best coach! -
<p>Farrell has been a cool, calm head at 10. Less so in contact but his play has mostly been controlled. He has always been a good kicker from hand and tee and also pretty unflappable. Sure he gets schizoid now and agin but the next minute he's mister control. His game control has been good and improving all the while, it was always his ability to set the back line alight and/or be a running threat himself that was suss. Over the last year and a bit he's been improving the last two aspects of his game very well. He's never going to be a natural but he won't be found wanting for lack of work ethic. At present he is our best option at 10 and a bloody good option at that. For choice I'd take an in form Cipriani or Ford over an in form Farrell but he is always in form. They are not.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hard to ignore.</p> -
ah okay thanks.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="586681" data-time="1465648437">
<div>
<p>And while the penalty count was bad for us - discipline etc - <strong>the bigger factor is WHERE we gave those penalties away. In our half.</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Whereas, from my earlier post: when we got into the red zone England were confident in their line speed and didn't attack the ruck. We were laser-focused on upsetting their ball, and doing that anywhere inside your 40 metres is going to result in issues.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>While i sort of agree with you mate, but indiscipline wherever it is, just robs you of momentum and possession. I should know, I've been an England fan the last, well forever really.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Nice to be on the other side of the ledger for once.</p> -
<p>Wow, did not expect that result. Typical England peaking between world cups again :)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But seriously, how on earth were they so poor at the world cup with some of the players they have? Australia looked a bit off their game though, I still pick them to win the series once they get going. Having a goal kicker like Farrell is so crucial. A rare off night for Foley certainly didn't help.</p> -
<p>Yep Ritchie. We were lucky Australia didn't turn up. Only way we could win.</p>
-
The eddie jones Appointment is looking like a master stroke it has to be said,<br><br>I think his understanding of SH rugby gives them a different edge.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="586848" data-time="1465679296">
<div>
<p>Yep Ritchie. We were lucky Australia didn't turn up. Only way we could win.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Calm down. England were bloody good but on reflection, I didn't explicitly say it, so maybe you are entitled to your little sulk. I'll say it more clearly, I'm amazed a team with this quality were so poor in their own world cup.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Do you think Australia were at their best?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Virgil" data-cid="586824" data-time="1465676316"><p>
Well the Lions put 40 on a couple years ago.</p></blockquote>
<br>
Nah. Doesn't count. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="586830" data-time="1465677142">
<div>
<p>While i sort of agree with you mate, but indiscipline wherever it is, just robs you of momentum and possession. I should know, I've been an England fan the last, well forever really.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Nice to be on the other side of the ledger for once.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Yes, but on a couple of occasions we gave away one in your half followed immediately by one in our half e.g. Foley's non-try, which Cheika actually talked about in the presser.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The ARU have started using FB live for those pressers BTW - good move for those of us without pay TV.</p> -
Nick how do you think they fix the pack without affecting the game plan?<br><br>
Horwill looked good when he came on, Kepu obviously adds a bit more around the track than Holmes, and I still maintain one of Hooper or Fardy needs to make way for an actual #8.<br><br>
I wouldn't touch the backline, thought it looked good
