• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.6k Posts 96 Posters 134.8k Views
All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1339

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    He came from distance at speed and hit a player that was not affecting the outcome of the ruck and who was unsighted and unable to defend himself

    Scooter’s clean out had no influence on the outcome of that breakdown

    None of that is illegal.

    Will be interesting to see if the yellow is rescinded if there was no illegal contact.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1340

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    He came from distance at speed and hit a player that was not affecting the outcome of the ruck and who was unsighted and unable to defend himself

    Scooter’s clean out had no influence on the outcome of that breakdown

    None of that is illegal.

    No attempt to bind
    Off feet

    Yes I know it goes on at nearly every ruck but it's still against the laws

    Already on a YC and right in front of the ref is some real dumb shit

    So I'll change my view to 3 on the clumsy / dumb side of the scale

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #1341

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @MiketheSnow Did you watch the show? They showed two clean outs to the heads of All Blacks. Scott’s was to the right of the ball, and yes worthy of a penalty, but not to head. Your dirt rating assumes intent which is just speculation.

    See the previous reply

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1342

    @MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    No attempt to bind
    Off feet

    Yeah, that is less legal ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #1343

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Two things I thought at the game
    Can't blame AB backs at all, AB forwards were destroyed
    Missing McCaw leadership. Roigard brought it funnily enough. Focused. Gave me heart

    And Carter’s sweeping left boot, and Nonu’s ball carrying, and Read’s running with reckless abandon, and Kaino’s breakdown work, and Owen Franks scrum and clean outs, and Bender’s jinky runs …

    and Conrad’s coolness

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1344

    @MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Watching the Breakdown. Jeff Wilson is spot on re Scott Barrett. Cleanout to shoulder. Lots of other clean outs similar. Should not have been a yellow.

    Absolute nonsense

    He came from distance at speed and hit a player that was not affecting the outcome of the ruck and who was unsighted and unable to defend himself

    Scooter’s clean out had no influence on the outcome of that breakdown

    On the clumsy to filth scale where clumsy is 1 and filth is 10 this rates between 6 and 7 for me and deservedly merited a YC

    I don’t mind the fact that someone in our team felt compelled to whack Marx, even if it was a bit of a cheap shot - but it was just on the wrong side of the line between enforcement and grubbery given Marx was prone - if he’d done something similar while Marx was standing in the ruck we’d all be applauding it

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #1345

    So was this us keeping our powder dry or have we gone and completely saturated it?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1346

    dry powder but dry milk powder

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    wrote on last edited by
    #1347

    Just a question on lineouts and mauls where we hit pinged for being early about 4 or 5 times. Can the attacking team bind before their player in the air lands? Seems like everyone starts early.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to kev on last edited by pakman
    #1348

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Just a question on lineouts and mauls where we hit pinged for being early about 4 or 5 times. Can the attacking team bind before their player in the air lands? Seems like everyone starts early.

    I don't believe so. ABs were pinged three times in a row for binding early. First two they did so, but Cane argued, probably correctly, that Boks were taking jumper down on top of them, in which penalty for jumping across the line. Third penalty was absolutely marginal, but by then think Carley thought ABs were taking mickey and started to see things.

    And scrum penalty when five yards from our line was also dodgy. Would be interested in what @NTA thought, but to me Malherbe driving up and slightly in, EDG digs in and shoves back, getting under FM's ribs. He has to step back to regain balance and takes scrum down, and EDG with him. A relieving penalty then might well have altered the card dynamic.

    Bloody difficult real time but clear on replay.

    So two of first six or seven penalties bogus.

    Which means Scooter's overbalance (he lifted his hands up to avoid Faf), which arguably wasn't even a penalty, most certainly oughtn't have been yellow.

    AB pack at full complement actually withstood everything Boks threw at them, and Big Sam even stole a lineout.

    K NTAN N 3 Replies Last reply
    7
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #1349

    @kiwiinmelb said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Canes4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @kiwiinmelb it was De Groot the first time.

    Yeah was second time

    Frans dropped the second scrum after EDG got under him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1350

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Just a question on lineouts and mauls where we hit pinged for being early about 4 or 5 times. Can the attacking team bind before their player in the air lands? Seems like everyone starts early.

    Which means Scooter's overbalance (he lifted his hands up to avoid Faf), which arguably wasn't even a penalty, most certainly oughtn't have been yellow.

    He got tackled into the halfback by a Bok. Argue the Bok was offside when he did it.

    Seems like the attacking team rarely gets penalised at lineouts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CanerbryC Offline
    CanerbryC Offline
    Canerbry
    wrote on last edited by
    #1351

    image.png

    Pretty classic Foster result, the thing is we used to find a way to win our bad games. Now we just suffer a series of historic losses.

    A lot of "all time greats" looking very creaky.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1352

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    And scrum penalty when five yards from our line was also dodgy. Would be interested in what @NTA thought, but to me Malherbe driving up and slightly in, EDG digs in and shoves back, getting under FM's ribs. He has to step back to regain balance and takes scrum down, and EDG with him. A relieving penalty then might well have altered the card dynamic.

    Time stamp?

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Tim on last edited by sparky
    #1353

    @Tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Some real dud selections in this squad. Williams and Newell are nowhere near ready for test rugby, Vaa'i has no physical impact, and Jacobson is a converted seven who is absolutely lost at test level. Then there is the thoroughly unathletic Lienert-Brown.

    France will destroy that forward pack.

    De Groot is back to slow and ponderous.

    Ryan needs to open both eyes.

    Private Frazer: “We’re dooooooooooomed.”

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #1354

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Watching the Breakdown. Jeff Wilson is spot on re Scott Barrett. Cleanout to shoulder. Lots of other clean outs similar. Should not have been a yellow.

    What absolute nonsense. It was a clear Yellow Card. Jeff Wilson has become the king of defending the indefensible.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1355

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Which means Scooter's overbalance (he lifted his hands up to avoid Faf), which arguably wasn't even a penalty, most certainly oughtn't have been yellow.

    Clever how EE helped him take Faf out

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to NTA on last edited by pakman
    #1356

    @NTA About nine minutes of official time.

    The scrum a minute later looked to me to be textbook.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #1357

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Watching the Breakdown. Jeff Wilson is spot on re Scott Barrett. Cleanout to shoulder. Lots of other clean outs similar. Should not have been a yellow.

    Sensible fella Wilson, obvious red.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to pakman on last edited by NTA
    #1358

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @NTA About nine minutes of official time.

    The scrum a minute later looked to me to be textbook.

    Let's watch a few eh?

    06:25 - solid from both sides. Malherbe has superb control and balance, with his knee nearly on the deck but driving EdG's mass up a tick, while bending his neck down.

    09:20 - post-hit:
    EdG isn't in great position, arched in the upper back a little.
    Lomax's side of the scrum is very low - by the time the camera zooms in, you can already see his knee on the deck through the tunnel.
    The call was black THP going to knee. There's no replay angle from that side but you can see it from the open side, and by Coles and EdG having to reset their feet as the motion goes sideways.

    10:38 - Boks take scrum from that penalty. Whatever Lomax did wrong in the previous scrum, he corrected it. Good scrum. Good contest. Boks called to use it.

    12:00 - Boks win the hit. Fucking quick heel from Coles and Ardie is away i.e.
    12:02 set called
    12:05 ball fed
    12:06 Ardie detaches

    P 3 Replies Last reply
    8

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.