Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
-
@KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
3 overs of Bracewell might be enough
Yep, to be fair I'd be bowling Neesham at this stage instead of a second spinner, but Bracewell's still not a bad selection
And Lochie nearly gets an inside edge onto the stumps, that instead scuttles away for four.
-
@MajorRage said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
Completely not joking I still have Oz as favourites heres. And have just bet accordingly.
I've upvoted for agreement ... but booooo
-
Goddamn fuck it. Do I have to go to bed?
A man has to do ...
-
We've waited far too long to give Boult another crack
-
Fuck this. Am off to bed.
-
@No-Quarter said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
We've waited far too long to give Boult another crack
Kane's tactics have been poor. Did he forget we are defending a low score? At last Boult is back into the attack and almost gets a wicket first ball
-
@Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
Hard to blame too much on Kane’s bowling choices, given only his opening bowlers have fronted with the ball tonight.
He didn't bowl them long enough. He's wasted the juicyness of the ball on the spinners
-
@Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
Hard to blame too much on Kane’s bowling choices, given only his opening bowlers have fronted with the ball tonight.
Yeah, for mine he could have given Boult 2 overs sooner before these guys got set, but other than that it's the other bowlers that haven't fronted as yet
-
We've certainly missed some run out chances as well
-
He also pushed the field back to soon and let the singles come to easy to build this partnership.
He should have keep the squeeze on when we had them 5 down.
Instead of the in out field he applied he should have kept the 15 metre circle tight to cut down singles and not them run the 2s they have.Keep Boult on and pushed the run rate up.