• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
381 Posts 29 Posters 16.3k Views
Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    3 overs of Bracewell might be enough

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #86

    @KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    3 overs of Bracewell might be enough

    Yep, to be fair I'd be bowling Neesham at this stage instead of a second spinner, but Bracewell's still not a bad selection 🙂

    And Lochie nearly gets an inside edge onto the stumps, that instead scuttles away for four. 😞

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by canefan
    #87

    I can't relax right now. These two look far too comfortable. Bring Boult on to try and finish these guys off. This is starting to feel like the English tour again

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by MajorRage
    #88

    Completely not joking I still have Oz as favourites heres. And have just bet accordingly.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Don't think this pitch will suit Santner as much either. Neesham first, maybe, maybe even D Mitchell for pace that may not quite kick on on this pitch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by canefan
    #90

    We've missed our chance. We are going to lose this game. Fucken BCs. The RR is under 5. If we don't get these next 2 or 3 out soon it's going to be over for us

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    Just need one of those from the Neesh to pop up to a short mid wicket or cover.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by booboo
    #92

    @MajorRage said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Completely not joking I still have Oz as favourites heres. And have just bet accordingly.

    I've upvoted for agreement ... but booooo

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #93

    Kane has lost it. Far too timid. These two are taking the game away from us. And we've helped them do it

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by booboo
    #94

    Goddamn fuck it. Do I have to go to bed?

    A man has to do ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    Mitch is about as threatening as a Teddy bear

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    We are leaking runs goddammit. It's falling apart

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    We've waited far too long to give Boult another crack

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #98

    Fuck this. Am off to bed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by canefan
    #99

    @No-Quarter said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    We've waited far too long to give Boult another crack

    Kane's tactics have been poor. Did he forget we are defending a low score? At last Boult is back into the attack and almost gets a wicket first ball

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    Hard to blame too much on Kane’s bowling choices, given only his opening bowlers have fronted with the ball tonight.

    canefanC No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #101

    @Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Hard to blame too much on Kane’s bowling choices, given only his opening bowlers have fronted with the ball tonight.

    He didn't bowl them long enough. He's wasted the juicyness of the ball on the spinners

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #102

    @Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    Hard to blame too much on Kane’s bowling choices, given only his opening bowlers have fronted with the ball tonight.

    Yeah, for mine he could have given Boult 2 overs sooner before these guys got set, but other than that it's the other bowlers that haven't fronted as yet

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #103

    We've certainly missed some run out chances as well

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by Chris
    #104

    He also pushed the field back to soon and let the singles come to easy to build this partnership.
    He should have keep the squeeze on when we had them 5 down.
    Instead of the in out field he applied he should have kept the 15 metre circle tight to cut down singles and not them run the 2s they have.

    Keep Boult on and pushed the run rate up.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.