• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Pumas 1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
1.3k Posts 92 Posters 98.0k Views
All Blacks v Pumas 1
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #160

    @pakman said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Tim said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    It’s a tad concerning that his noggin is copping quite a few knocks lately.

    Has it been confirmed that his noggin took the knock?

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #161

    @ACT-Crusader Not as far as I have seen.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #162

    @nzzp said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew christ, your a pendant

    (triggered yet?)

    I'm an anti-pedant pedant.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #163

    @Frank said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    Would love to see how Perofeta goes at 10 after Mounga has played the first 60 or so(assuming we can afford to bring him on)

    Think he'll be on the bench if BB is ruled out but Ritche may well play the full 80 depending on how the game pans out.

    ACT CrusaderA KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #164

    @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Frank said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    Would love to see how Perofeta goes at 10 after Mounga has played the first 60 or so(assuming we can afford to bring him on)

    Think he'll be on the bench if BB is ruled out but Ritche may well play the full 80 depending on how the game pans out.

    Just throwing it out there, but could we see the same starting backline as SA 2, but on the bench have a midfielder (QT or RTS) plus a winger (eg Reece).

    Plan to play Mo’unga for 80 and better utilise the options on the bench. If he gets crook we run with either Jordie or Havili at 10.

    CrucialC Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #165

    @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

    Chris B.C ACT CrusaderA Victor MeldrewV 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #166

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Frank said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    Would love to see how Perofeta goes at 10 after Mounga has played the first 60 or so(assuming we can afford to bring him on)

    Think he'll be on the bench if BB is ruled out but Ritche may well play the full 80 depending on how the game pans out.

    Just throwing it out there, but could we see the same starting backline as SA 2, but on the bench have a midfielder (QT or RTS) plus a winger (eg Reece).

    Plan to play Mo’unga for 80 and better utilise the options on the bench. If he gets crook we run with either Jordie or Havili at 10.

    Imagine the shit Foster would cop if that didn't work out.

    It will be interesting to see how/if they can give RTS playing time though. With 4 midfielders that aren't versatile the options are limited. They have obviously worked hard on upskilling QT to play 13 and currently he is the only real cover there except Ennor.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #167

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

    That's what I'd plan to do.

    I don't really hold with the idea of planned substitution of your first five - but, you need cover in case he gets hurt (or is having an absolute mare).

    I'd like to see some tests where Beaudy and Richie aren't paired, because they don't seem to have quite worked out as hoped. I think Fozzie has been playing a game of trying to keep both of them happy with game time, possibly to the detriment of the team.

    So Perofeta (or DMac) on the bench.

    CrucialC No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #168

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

    After watching Aussies and Argies and the Argies propensity to kick, I’d be hesitant to replace Jordie given he seems to have found his mojo again for attacking the high ball. He was pretty key for us in SA 2 in the air.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #169

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

    That's what I'd plan to do.

    I don't really hold with the idea of planned substitution of your first five - but, you need cover in case he gets hurt (or is having an absolute mare).

    I'd like to see some tests where Beaudy and Richie aren't paired, because they don't seem to have quite worked out as hoped. I think Fozzie has been playing a game of trying to keep both of them happy with game time, possibly to the detriment of the team.

    So Perofeta (or DMac) on the bench.

    We seem to think that we need bench firepower at 10 when we should be planning to be in control.
    A tactical change up could work well where Fakatava keeps the other team in doubt but the 10 keeps them pinned back. I'd like to see how Perofeta goes in that situation.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #170

    @Crucial or possibly smith off the bench and plays the playmaker role a bit more from 9 as he he did for the landers when gilbert was at 10 this year

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #171

    I think we started with Lomax and De Groot against the Boks because we saw they had selected their weaker scrummaging props to start. So, if the Argies start with their best scrummaging front row, I think Newell and Bower get the start.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #172

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

    That's what I'd plan to do.

    I don't really hold with the idea of planned substitution of your first five - but, you need cover in case he gets hurt (or is having an absolute mare).

    I'd like to see some tests where Beaudy and Richie aren't paired, because they don't seem to have quite worked out as hoped. I think Fozzie has been playing a game of trying to keep both of them happy with game time, possibly to the detriment of the team.

    So Perofeta (or DMac) on the bench.

    It's been an ongoing frustration that they keep pairing Beauden and Mo'unga together when it clearly hasn't been working. Even if both players are buying into the idea off the pitch, in the heat of a test we get a jumbled approach and neither really take control of the game. Mo'unga definitely benefited from being in charge last test and played a lot better as a result.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #173

    Kick off is 745? What the actual fuck?

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #174

    @Machpants

    I guess it's about how much time there is between the two Tests.

    The Aussie Test is at 5:30pm. I presume that would finish around 7:15ish then the broadcasters would want some time in between

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Duluth on last edited by Stargazer
    #175

    @Duluth Also remember that the Aussie tests are in Adelaide. South Australia has a weird time zone, being half an hour (not an hour) behind NSW, Queensland etc.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #176

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

    Yeah, I thought that, but we have enough cover there already with Giraffe & Jordan and I suspect Foster sees Perofeta as the 3rd 10.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #177

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Frank said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    Would love to see how Perofeta goes at 10 after Mounga has played the first 60 or so(assuming we can afford to bring him on)

    Think he'll be on the bench if BB is ruled out but Ritche may well play the full 80 depending on how the game pans out.

    Just throwing it out there, but could we see the same starting backline as SA 2, but on the bench have a midfielder (QT or RTS) plus a winger (eg Reece).

    Plan to play Mo’unga for 80 and better utilise the options on the bench. If he gets crook we run with either Jordie or Havili at 10.

    I think they want to win this one well and go for experience, so suspect QT on the bench instead of RTS. Foster can then give some of the newbies game time in Pumas 2.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #178

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Duluth Also remember that the Aussie tests are in Adelaide. South Australia has a weird time zone, being half an hour (not an hour) behind NSW, Queensland etc.

    😉

    Quite historic, can’t recall a test match in Adelaide

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #179

    @ACT-Crusader The 2003 RWC had games at Adelaide Oval, including a Wallaby pool game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks v Pumas 1
Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.