Springboks v All Blacks I
-
Any chance the Bok gets off with no suspension? Is there some rule where you can challenge someone in the air with no intention of catching the ball and knock them onto their neck/head but it's considered a 'soak challenge' so should really have been play on.
-
@Toddy said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
Any chance the Bok gets off with no suspension? Is there some rule where you can challenge someone in the air with no intention of catching the ball and knock them onto their neck/head but it's considered a 'soak challenge' so should really have been play on.
The biggest problem for the Bok winger is that he hit BB who was in the air and he was still on the ground. Never had a chance of having an in the air contest.
-
@Toddy said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
Any chance the Bok gets off with no suspension? Is there some rule where you can challenge someone in the air with no intention of catching the ball and knock them onto their neck/head but it's considered a 'soak challenge' so should really have been play on.
Those type of incidents are some of the worst. Even more so than an accidental high shot, the chaser is closing in on an opponent in a vulnerable position who doesn't see them coming. Just like tunnelling in basketball it is extremely dangerous. That guy should get a long suspension, BB could have got a life suspension from using his body from the head down
-
@ACT-Crusader I think everyone on here is guilty of provincial bias towards a team they love/hate lol, some worse than others haha.
-
@pakman said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@stodders said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@kev said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@stodders you have to win the contact.
I thought ABs did that at times. Problem was, ABs committed too many men to breakdown, so after 2 or 3 phases they were running out of players and Boks were picking them off.
ABs body angles at clearout aren't good enough to clear bodies, so it is taking an extra man to effect it. It doesn't help that refs are allowing players to slow ball down whilst clearly not supporting their bodyweight, but hey, c'est la vie.
What seems to be issue is that oppo tacklers good at impeding ball placement. Then second man patient and gets the latch. Our cleaners aren’t taking him out.
Noticed Ardie several times looking to do same, but all but once Boks body smashed into him, in some cases arguably before he’d joined the ruck.
Yeah, but Marx has awful technique and gets away with it. It's supposed to be exactly what they're looking for to penalise - hands on the floor first, hips well in front of feet, knees leaning on the player on the ground, taking advantage of his own players impeding cleaners and ball placement. It literally ticks all the fucking boxes, almost everytime and then that fluffybunny Gardiner has the gall to penalise Scooter for offside on the charge down and Cane for being off his feet despite never being off his feet.
He's lined himself up nicely for a RWC final gig.
-
"We're pretty excited about the next challenge of playing at Ellis Park for a trophy."
The guy seems to dine out on losses in search of the next thrill.
-
@Billy-Tell said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
"We're pretty excited about the next challenge of playing at Ellis Park for a trophy."
The guy seems to dine out on losses in search of the next thrill.
Argentina will fancy their chances. Oz too
-
As bok supporter im pretty happy with that, we came into the game favourites and played like it. The team had a calm confidence about them where they knew that theyd win if they only did their job right. It wasnt the flashiest performance but didnt need to be and cutting out all risk just made it impossible for the All Blacks to fluke a try to bring them back into the game.
Couple of work ons though - the maul isnt working and even if New Zealand defended well it wasnt great against wales either. But mauling is such a part of our game that im pretty sure we'll get it right soon enough.
We should also have found a way to score few more points in the first thirty when we were camped in the All Black 22. It has been a consistent issue in 2021 and 2022 so i have less fiath that we'll find solution to that one.
But my god NZ were poor. Its hard to say if the players or the coaches are to blame, but there are bunch of guys that dont look up to the standards of all Blacks of the last 20years. Also a couple of the old heads were poor and having three test Centurions all misfiring at the same time makes you wonder whether they have time left in their career to turn things around.
I have never seen New Zealand have so many different issues all at the same time and the next coach will have some very tough calls to make about personnel and game plan.
-
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@Tim But then after that, he came right and put the SA prop under pressure. Is it a concentration thing?
First scrum with this AB pack, and that Bok pack with Angus’s calling, is always likely to cause initial scrum instability. Many good refs make allowances.
-
@pakman said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@Tim But then after that, he came right and put the SA prop under pressure. Is it a concentration thing?
First scrum with this AB pack, and that Bok pack with Angus’s calling, is always likely to cause initial scrum instability. Many good refs make allowances.
Just rewatching. I'd be interested in @NTA view, but it looked to me as though Kitshoff pulled that down.
In which case, file with kickable penalty against PSDT for non-release on first Marx jackal, and non-penalty for Cane jackal which AG missed and penalised him for fishing on deck.
-
@Bones said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@pakman said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@stodders said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@kev said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@stodders you have to win the contact.
I thought ABs did that at times. Problem was, ABs committed too many men to breakdown, so after 2 or 3 phases they were running out of players and Boks were picking them off.
ABs body angles at clearout aren't good enough to clear bodies, so it is taking an extra man to effect it. It doesn't help that refs are allowing players to slow ball down whilst clearly not supporting their bodyweight, but hey, c'est la vie.
What seems to be issue is that oppo tacklers good at impeding ball placement. Then second man patient and gets the latch. Our cleaners aren’t taking him out.
Noticed Ardie several times looking to do same, but all but once Boks body smashed into him, in some cases arguably before he’d joined the ruck.
Yeah, but Marx has awful technique and gets away with it. It's supposed to be exactly what they're looking for to penalise - hands on the floor first, hips well in front of feet, knees leaning on the player on the ground, taking advantage of his own players impeding cleaners and ball placement. It literally ticks all the fucking boxes, almost everytime and then that fluffybunny Gardiner has the gall to penalise Scooter for offside on the charge down and Cane for being off his feet despite never being off his feet.
He's lined himself up nicely for a RWC final gig.
First penalty PSDT was all over carrier like cheap Italian suit. No release, clear or otherwise!
-
@pakman and if we are going relitigate the entire game, kickable penalty against Barret for the intercept and no kickable penalty against De Allende as Smith was offside first.
Gardner wasnt perfect, but hebis not reason the game wasnt even close
-
@SidBarret said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@pakman and if we are going relitigate the entire game, kickable penalty against Barret for the intercept and no kickable penalty against De Allende as Smith was offside first.
Gardner wasnt perfect, but hebis not reason the game wasnt even close
Yep. Sometimes certain penalties can arrest momentum. But on the whole Gardener was good (apart from his non-calling of the Bok fliers which is just a blight on the game). But that wasn't the case yesterday. ABs were not even close to a contentious decision being a game changer.
-
@pakman said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@pakman said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@Tim But then after that, he came right and put the SA prop under pressure. Is it a concentration thing?
First scrum with this AB pack, and that Bok pack with Angus’s calling, is always likely to cause initial scrum instability. Many good refs make allowances.
Just rewatching. I'd be interested in @NTA view, but it looked to me as though Kitshoff pulled that down.
In which case, file with kickable penalty against PSDT for non-release on first Marx jackal, and non-penalty for Cane jackal which AG missed and penalised him for fishing on deck.
Kitschoff was a sub in minute 39.
Nyakane was up against Ta'avao. I thought Nyakane was clever...he pulled back ever so slightly because Ta'avao had overstretched on the engage. Only one way Ta'avao was going. Good lesson for him.
-
@stodders said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@pakman said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@pakman said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@Tim But then after that, he came right and put the SA prop under pressure. Is it a concentration thing?
First scrum with this AB pack, and that Bok pack with Angus’s calling, is always likely to cause initial scrum instability. Many good refs make allowances.
Just rewatching. I'd be interested in @NTA view, but it looked to me as though Kitshoff pulled that down.
In which case, file with kickable penalty against PSDT for non-release on first Marx jackal, and non-penalty for Cane jackal which AG missed and penalised him for fishing on deck.
Kitschoff was a sub in minute 39.
Nyakane was up against Ta'avao. I thought Nyakane was clever...he pulled back ever so slightly because Ta'avao had overstretched on the engage. Only one way Ta'avao was going. Good lesson for him.
Nyakane played Ta'avao, sure. But the penalty I'm talking about in second half.
-
@SidBarret said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
@pakman and if we are going relitigate the entire game, kickable penalty against Barret for the intercept and no kickable penalty against De Allende as Smith was offside first.
Gardner wasnt perfect, but hebis not reason the game wasnt even close
I disagree on first, but De Allende did seem harsh.
But the first Marx jackal ought to have been a nailed on 3 for ABs. At 7-3 after 20 it's a different ball game.
-
@canefan said in Springboks v All Blacks I:
Doesn't change the fact that we suck balls right now. This must be the worst AB team in memory in my lifetime
There seems to be no sense of calm belief. But I've got to feel sorry for Fozzie, oddly enough.
At 55 we're getting on top, Havilli kicks us 5m out. Cue Frizell inability to understand English, albeit Strine, and then Rieko unforced Hail Mary which Pollard smartly converts to another 3.
Hard to come back after that!
EDIT: Then Coles drops 5m out, then crooked throw.
-
I am replying to myself but whatever.
I watched the game secomd time and want to amend some of my earlier comments.
The maul was actually pretty good, we just didnt get any lineouts within strike range.
But our attack is even worse than i thought at first. In the first 20 we got around all black defense three times but kinda drifted into touch twice and De Allende failed to pass when we had an easy two on one.
We had further two shots in the 22, but was way to predictable with carries off nine. The All Blacks did well to fold round, but we didnt make them having to make any hard decisions. Very dissappointing that there isnt any evidence of improvement.
Its pretty clear that SA went into their shell in the second half. I understand the call, but they could have gone for the throat.
