• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Foster, Robertson etc

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
5.7k Posts 131 Posters 740.9k Views
Foster, Robertson etc
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #4329

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    Seriously?

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Online
    nostrildamusN Online
    nostrildamus
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #4330

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    1. Coulda died.
    2. Shoulda died.
    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Old Samurai Jack on last edited by
    #4331

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    esp. A.Smith and his kicking stance

    I mean I'm with you for the rest of it, but what the fuck? Oh yeah because every other halfback, we're absolutely clueless they're going to throw up a box until it's halfway down the tramlines.

    That's not a thing.

    O 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #4332

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    Seriously?

    I was asking you because, unlike me, you seem to know something about rugby.
    I'm meaning their attack patterns.
    Was interested in what they actually are.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #4333

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    Seriously?

    I was asking you because, unlike me, you seem to know something about rugby.
    I'm meaning their attack patterns.
    Was interested in what they actually are.

    Ok it's obviously way more complicated than this but

    Check out videos from their tour to NZ. They compress their attack in to like half the field. And they either hit forwards running unders angles if the defence stays strung out across the field, or they use their backs running loops to outflank you if you compress.

    This way they exploit where you are weakest. It works because they have great forward runners and their timing is excellent. If they had real pace at 13 they would carve teams. R Ioane at 13 for Ireland would be fucking lethal with the space they create.

    The Maori actually stopped it a few times by spot tackling the looping player. But the ABs struggled with that.

    gt12G ChrisC F No QuarterN 4 Replies Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by gt12
    #4334

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    Seriously?

    I was asking you because, unlike me, you seem to know something about rugby.
    I'm meaning their attack patterns.
    Was interested in what they actually are.

    Ok it's obviously way more complicated than this but

    Check out videos from their tour to NZ. They compress their attack in to like half the field. And they either hit forwards running unders angles if the defence stays strung out across the field, or they use their backs running loops to outflank you if you compress.

    This way they exploit where you are weakest. It works because they have great forward runners and their timing is excellent. If they had real pace at 13 they would carve teams. R Ioane at 13 for Ireland would be fucking lethal with the space they create.

    The Maori actually stopped it a few times by spot tackling the looping player. But the ABs struggled with that.

    The Maori played with much more of a rush, as they appeared to have a defense coach and system appropriate to the 21st century, and unsurprisingly caused that pattern a few more problems.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #4335

    @gt12 said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    Seriously?

    I was asking you because, unlike me, you seem to know something about rugby.
    I'm meaning their attack patterns.
    Was interested in what they actually are.

    Ok it's obviously way more complicated than this but

    Check out videos from their tour to NZ. They compress their attack in to like half the field. And they either hit forwards running unders angles if the defence stays strung out across the field, or they use their backs running loops to outflank you if you compress.

    This way they exploit where you are weakest. It works because they have great forward runners and their timing is excellent. If they had real pace at 13 they would carve teams. R Ioane at 13 for Ireland would be fucking lethal with the space they create.

    The Maori actually stopped it a few times by spot tackling the looping player. But the ABs struggled with that.

    The Maori played with much more of a rush, as they appeared to have a defense coach and system appropriate to the 21st century, and unsurprisingly caused that pattern a few more problems.

    Helped by the Irish tram that was put out not being as powerful up front or crisp in their passing.

    But yes, our defensive pattern actually plays in to the Irish hands as we like to isolate our wingers and rely on the centre holding in then using pace to cover. Ireland exploit that very seam.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #4336

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    Seriously?

    I was asking you because, unlike me, you seem to know something about rugby.
    I'm meaning their attack patterns.
    Was interested in what they actually are.

    Ok it's obviously way more complicated than this but

    Check out videos from their tour to NZ. They compress their attack in to like half the field. And they either hit forwards running unders angles if the defence stays strung out across the field, or they use their backs running loops to outflank you if you compress.

    This way they exploit where you are weakest. It works because they have great forward runners and their timing is excellent. If they had real pace at 13 they would carve teams. R Ioane at 13 for Ireland would be fucking lethal with the space they create.

    The Maori actually stopped it a few times by spot tackling the looping player. But the ABs struggled with that.

    Yep it is a lot like the British league's side used to run their attacking patterns a few years ago.
    Target the player looping or not letting the forward runners get to far over the advantage line while trying to slow down the phase ball nullifies it,But easier said than done if it is a well drilled team sending it your way.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #4337

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    Seriously?

    I was asking you because, unlike me, you seem to know something about rugby.
    I'm meaning their attack patterns.
    Was interested in what they actually are.

    Ok it's obviously way more complicated than this but

    Check out videos from their tour to NZ. They compress their attack in to like half the field. And they either hit forwards running unders angles if the defence stays strung out across the field, or they use their backs running loops to outflank you if you compress.

    This way they exploit where you are weakest. It works because they have great forward runners and their timing is excellent. If they had real pace at 13 they would carve teams. R Ioane at 13 for Ireland would be fucking lethal with the space they create.

    The Maori actually stopped it a few times by spot tackling the looping player. But the ABs struggled with that.

    Gee, hope the ABs actually have an actual plan to stop it come World Cup time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #4338

    Last week we built a similar lead to what South Africa did today but folded like a cheap suit when down a man for the final 10 minutes. South Africa went down a man for the final 20 minutes but held onto their lead for a dominant win. Despite all the improvement that Ryan and Schmidt have brought the Foster factor still hangs over the team and we are still flaky as hell.

    canefanC Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by canefan
    #4339

    @kiwi_expat said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Last week we built a similar lead to what South Africa did today but folded like a cheap suit when down a man for the final 10 minutes. South Africa went down a man for the final 20 minutes but held onto their lead for a dominant win. Despite all the improvement that Ryan and Schmidt have brought the Foster factor still hangs over the team and we are still flaky as hell.

    Im assuming they didn't resort to attacking from deep in their own half and low percentage cross field kicks?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #4340

    @Bones Back leg straight, foot pointed towards the sky, the ole box kick stance. There ain't no subtlety in it.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Old Samurai Jack on last edited by
    #4341

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Bones Back leg straight, foot pointed towards the sky, the ole box kick stance. There ain't no subtlety in it.

    Oh not disputing that, but I can't think how Smith is any different (unless of course you're hinting at the lack of running threat as TR mentioned).

    If anything it's in a way less telegraphed as he doesn't fuck about setting a snake and rolling the ball back half a mile.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by Victor Meldrew
    #4342

    @kiwi_expat said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Last week we built a similar lead to what South Africa did today but folded like a cheap suit when down a man for the final 10 minutes. South Africa went down a man for the final 20 minutes but held onto their lead for a dominant win. Despite all the improvement that Ryan and Schmidt have brought the Foster factor still hangs over the team and we are still flaky as hell.

    Sth Africa dealt with being a man down as well as the AB's did when BB was sin-binned at Ellis Park in the RC.

    In the England game, we seem to have gone backwards in that aspect of play compared that Ellis Park win - particularly in the forwards where we were a bit shambolic in the last 10 minutes. Whitelock in particular looked fatigued and a little bit lost. The forwards in the last 10 minutes reminded me a bit of the Crusaders blowing that 5m scrum and gifting a win to the Blues in CH earlier this year.

    Foster & his forwards coach need to sort that aspect out pronto and get back into the same groove as we had at Ellis Park.

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #4343

    @Victor-Meldrew yep mate, I perhaps thought at end of test maybe why Sam W (much as I a fan) would be a risky captain for WC, I thought he looked fairly shot at end of test. I also thought it showed a bit how there seems to be a lack of leadership in backline without BB there?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #4344

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.

    What are those variations?

    Seriously?

    I was asking you because, unlike me, you seem to know something about rugby.
    I'm meaning their attack patterns.
    Was interested in what they actually are.

    Ok it's obviously way more complicated than this but

    Check out videos from their tour to NZ. They compress their attack in to like half the field. And they either hit forwards running unders angles if the defence stays strung out across the field, or they use their backs running loops to outflank you if you compress.

    This way they exploit where you are weakest. It works because they have great forward runners and their timing is excellent. If they had real pace at 13 they would carve teams. R Ioane at 13 for Ireland would be fucking lethal with the space they create.

    The Maori actually stopped it a few times by spot tackling the looping player. But the ABs struggled with that.

    Oh hell yeah Rieko looping around and taking the ball on the outside shoulder of the decoy runners would probably just run the try in untouched. Annoys me that we don't exploit that rule to give him more space. If we started doing that effectively with a player like him WR would probably have a look at the shepherding rules.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #4345
    Nov 29, 2022

    Hansen regrets not selecting Smith

    Hansen regrets not selecting Smith

    Otago great Ben Smith forced former All Blacks coach Steve Hansen into a rare admission of getting a selection wrong. The disappointment over the...

    so, what realisations can we expect from fozzie in 3-4 years time?

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #4346

    God that was so obvious at the time as well. Do we play veterans Beauden and Smith at 10/15, or do we throw an unproven rookie in at 10 and play Beauden out of position? Poor selections really cost us that cup.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by bayimports
    #4347

    @Kiwiwomble Hansen admits he gets his selection wrong for the semi final in a pursuit of trying to get dual play makers to succeed.

    NZR decide its best to continue by giving Foster the job because he will follow Hansen's glorious lead and maintain consistency

    Fast forward 2022 and what have we learnt..? lol..this is a dark comedy indeed

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #4348

    @No-Quarter said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    God that was so obvious at the time as well. Do we play veterans Beauden and Smith at 10/15, or do we throw an unproven rookie in at 10 and play Beauden out of position? Poor selections really cost us that cup.

    I've said it before, but after spending years banging the "Experience" drum, Hansen more or less abandoned it at the final hurdle.

    He could have fielded Beauden, Reiko, SBW, Crotty and Smith - but, he went with the relative rookies Richie, Sevu, ALB, Goodhue, Bridge and Beauden - as well as the SBarrett/Cane shift in the forwards.

    I wonder how many of those guys he would change if he had his time again - two (Cane and Smith) he's apparently specified.

    At the time it seemed like he was picking on form, but it was a bit odd that he left his drum behind.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Foster, Robertson etc
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.