Foster, Robertson etc
-
@Mr-Fish said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Mr-Fish hence my opening line.
Though your rebuttal is with great certainty - do you actually have some sort of proof of this or just heard from "good sources" like the rest of us have
Not suggesting you were claiming otherwise, just no point in us all heading down a track that's ultimately redundant (unlike all the other important, on-point conversations we have here...).
No proof I'm able to provide, unfortunately.
Ultimately, NZR were poised to make a change but the costs of doing so, coupled with very strong opposition from the players and not being able to get Schmidt on board, as well as being able to use the excuse of a 'turning point' in Jo'burg meant the status quo was maintained. Nothing more to it than that, really.
Fair post - I'd also personally feel terrible should I red herring of mine distract us from all the on point and important conversations we have here
So what this basically means is that if NZRU had "had it's way" i.e. players and Schmidt had been on board Robertson would be coaching the AB's already?
Realistically gazing into the crystal ball of subterfuge and rumors' it's still looking like it's Foster till the end of the RWC and then Robertson as the "preferred candidate" thereafter.
-
@gt12 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@gt12 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Fully fuck you for saying you want to be the AB coach but also want to beat the ABs.Does that apply to Schmitt, Hansen, Joseph, Henry, etc as well? Or is the problem he said it?
Schmidt made Ireland a force, and Hansen, Joseph, & Henry have and had no chance.
I'm happy to admit that it this is unfair, but there are acceptable international teams to coach and unacceptable ones.
If you make a good team a challenger, you're building your profile for the top job.
If you coach a true enemy (Wallabies, England, SA, Ireland now entering the chat) to the WC and say it out loud as your stated goal, go get fucked.
i admit i thought your first post was over the top...but i get you now and agree
-
@gt12 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@gt12 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Fully fuck you for saying you want to be the AB coach but also want to beat the ABs.Does that apply to Schmitt, Hansen, Joseph, Henry, etc as well? Or is the problem he said it?
Schmidt made Ireland a force, and Hansen, Joseph, & Henry have and had no chance.
I'm happy to admit that it this is unfair, but there are acceptable international teams to coach and unacceptable ones.
If you make a good team a challenger, you're building your profile for the top job.
If you coach a true enemy (Wallabies, England, SA, Ireland now entering the chat) to the WC and say it out loud as your stated goal, go get fucked.
Is the same true for those who are NZ-born and raised who play for the above four (when they beat the ABs) or is your ire exclusively reserved for coaches?
-
@gt12 Mmm...apparently getting international experience is a prerequisite for the job according to some...
End of the day, Schmidt, Hansen, Joseph, & Henry, etc, have all tried to beat the ABs. Some kind of warped worldview, mental gymnastics so you can condemn one and not the other is not going to change that. -
-
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@gt12 Mmm...apparently getting international experience is a prerequisite for the job according to some...
End of the day, Schmidt, Hansen, Joseph, & Henry, etc, have all tried to beat the ABs. Some kind of warped worldview, mental gymnastics so you can condemn one and not the other is not going to change that.Understandable from fan perspective: get international experience but don't beat us!
-
@taniwharugby said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew if that were to happen, I'd actually dislike the RWC more as it would ruin test rugby outside the RWC, we may as well have bloody friendlies or sumink!
Well, regarding most of the Tests as friendlies is the approach I've been taking to get me thru the shit-show of the last 2 years or so.
-
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew That is just sick.
It could be worse. It could be a re-run of the last 2 years....
-
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Mmm...apparently getting international experience is a prerequisite for the job according to some...
Certainly appears to be the case with the coach's employers at the moment, doesn't it?
-
The AB tactics seem absolutely stupid at times. The worst is taking the box kick inside the ABs 22 for it to land somewhere just outside the 22 and hoping we will get the ball back from this Hail Mary attempt. More times than not, the ball is given to the opposition when the defenses are in disarray and in prime attacking territory. The Prof. Smith said he really dislikes this tactic as it is such a low-percentage play (kick and hope) and the halfback projects what he is going to do to the opposition (esp. A.Smith and his kicking stance). Given our players look like they aren't coached to recover the ball as a team unlike Ireland and SA, it seems even more stupid. The "TJP box kick incident" versus England is the perfect example of this shit tactic.
The more I listen to people like Prof. Smith, the more I think the ABs are not in good hands with Foster. Accordingly, RM looks so much better running the cutter with the Crusaders with their more sensible approach, and I have a little sympathy for the defense coach (just a smidgeon though) and the wings trying to defend that seem to be on a hiding to nothing. -
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:
The AB tactics seem absolutely stupid at times. The worst is taking the box kick inside the ABs 22 for it to land somewhere just outside the 22 and hoping we will get the ball back from this Hail Mary attempt. More times than not, the ball is given to the opposition when the defenses are in disarray and in prime attacking territory. The Prof. Smith said he really dislikes this tactic as it is such a low-percentage play (kick and hope) and the halfback projects what he is going to do to the opposition (esp. A.Smith and his kicking stance). Given our players look like they aren't coached to recover the ball as a team unlike Ireland and SA, it seems even more stupid. The "TJP box kick incident" versus England is the perfect example of this shit tactic.
The more I listen to people like Prof. Smith, the more I think the ABs are not in good hands with Foster. Accordingly, RM looks so much better running the cutter with the Crusaders with their more sensible approach, and I have a little sympathy for the defense coach (just a smidgeon though) and the wings trying to defend that seem to be on a hiding to nothing.I fucken hate box kicks. I'd love to see the stats on how many recover, it wouldn't take long to count them up. I also agree that RM and at times BB when he's in the slot are being made to look worse versions of themselves due to tactics
-
@canefan The Black Fern's Cocksedge did the box kick beautifully in the WWC though. She put it long into the opposition's territory when there weren't any defenders back there and it always led to territorial pressure. They have their place in a smart game plan I think.
-
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@canefan The Black Fern's Cocksedge did the box kick beautifully in the WWC though. She put it long into the opposition's territory when there weren't any defenders back there and it always led to territorial pressure. They have their place in a smart game plan I think.
I don't think our AB (male) kickers are fantastic at the box kick; or they don't kick when there are dedicated and alert chasers.
Ireland has a 35.5% chance of scoring points when they enter their opponents 22, and they are rather good at generating those platforms because Ireland starts on average 8 attacks in their opponent 22. In contrast, New Zealand converts only 21.4% of their 7.6 attack starts in that zone. England converts at 22.4% of their 7.83 starts to points, while the Wallabies convert 34.8% of their 7 opportunities. -
@Old-Samurai-Jack most players telegraph a box kick in the way they set up, add in Smith doesn't run much (did a bit more on EOYT) means it is so easy to defend if he isn't setting a box, he is passing it, if 2 or 3 forwards are standing 3m away, you set on them, then pass back to the pod standing on the other side as well...so predictable.
-
We're whinging about something everyone does
Test rugby is super formulaic at the moment
ALL teams are pretty predictable. Most do the same things in the same areas
It's just if you are good at it or not.Our box kick exits are rubbish. Other teams are not.
Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations. It works because they do it well. They don't generally have a lot of points in them though.
Few teams turn up with something you haven't seen before.
-
@mariner4life Exactly! We are following other teams and we are shittier than them at those tactics! The ABs need to start innovating again.
-
@mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.
What are those variations?
-
@Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.
What are those variations?
Seriously?
-
@Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Ireland run the same attack religiously, it has like 2 variations.
What are those variations?
- Coulda died.
- Shoulda died.
-
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Foster, Robertson etc:
esp. A.Smith and his kicking stance
I mean I'm with you for the rest of it, but what the fuck? Oh yeah because every other halfback, we're absolutely clueless they're going to throw up a box until it's halfway down the tramlines.
That's not a thing.
