Super Rugby 2023
-
i also think we do ourselves no favours having oversized stadiums, just makes the problems look even worse
-
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Winger Posting Reason is an insta ban isn't it?
it's not a bad article actually
Still not clicking on the link. I'll just figure the arguments from the thread postings.
-
@antipodean said in Super Rugby 2023:
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Winger Posting Reason is an insta ban isn't it?
it's not a bad article actually
Actually it's much better than that. It's bang on the money.
We complain about the Herald who are nothing more than NZR's marketing branch and obsequious journos. This is the type of contrarian article we should be supporting. Nothing kills a competition more than predictable (don't look at my tipping) outcomes and one fucking team constantly winning it.
And having the ball in play more actually exacerbates the problem. They're fixing the wrong things at the wrong level.
SR should be competitive between teams.
Tests are the ones needing more time in play to reduce the behemoth turgidity.
On this point, the Crusaders are essentially playing their C team this week and they're still fielding more ABs than the Highlanders. That's fucked up. Clearly their are contracting improvements that can be made that spread the NZ talent around ...
On the broadcasting v crowds, surely NZR needs to look at compensating grounds with a share of the broadcast money so that they can have cheaper subsidised tickets? But, even the league match I went to this year in Oz was crazy expensive for a club match, I mean $50 for an end seat for a match involving the Warriors is criminal.
-
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@antipodean said in Super Rugby 2023:
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Winger Posting Reason is an insta ban isn't it?
it's not a bad article actually
Actually it's much better than that. It's bang on the money.
We complain about the Herald who are nothing more than NZR's marketing branch and obsequious journos. This is the type of contrarian article we should be supporting. Nothing kills a competition more than predictable (don't look at my tipping) outcomes and one fucking team constantly winning it.
And having the ball in play more actually exacerbates the problem. They're fixing the wrong things at the wrong level.
SR should be competitive between teams.
Tests are the ones needing more time in play to reduce the behemoth turgidity.
On this point, the Crusaders are essentially playing their C team this week and they're still fielding more ABs than the Highlanders. That's fucked up. Clearly their are contracting improvements that can be made that spread the NZ talent around ...
On the broadcasting v crowds, surely NZR needs to look at compensating grounds with a share of the broadcast money so that they can have cheaper subsidised tickets? But, even the league match I went to this year in Oz was crazy expensive for a club match, I mean $50 for an end seat for a match involving the Warriors is criminal.
I disagree about evening up teams, basiically what you suggesting is a draft, because everyone contracts own players. It just stops anyone bothering to develop good young players. I look at Canes after years they now have some good depth at loose forwards and midfield, should they be moving some on?
But then again I thoroughly enjoy the comp, and have since it started in 1996, we have complaints etc, and no doubt there could be improvements, but there not even enough agreeing a any forums etc that agree how it would be done better to show how it could be done.
Now some in Aus will say it should be only an Aus comp, and will tell you how 40,000 or whatever were at a final a couple of years ago, and ignore that there were no crowds as such at all the other games etc, because NZ teams are just bullies and woe is me etc. I bet if Reds were playing Crusaders in the final crowd would of been same. It's same here, I have read why isn't talent spread, it's because some teams (Crusaders a great example) have incredibly good development systems in place, do you say f*** em, don't develop player?
I heard one fella saying look at crowd at Warriors on Sunday 19000-20000 or something compared to rugby night before? Yep well good for Warriors, playing their first home game in 3 years or something, and I seem to remember the numbers back then were a bag of shit.Anyway my rant for Friday morning ,of course comp could be better in some was, I bet most fans of any sport would say same , but I got a full weekend of rugby to watch, both on TV and at grounds (clubs rugby starts here tomorrow) and Canes/Force game at PN, as well as on tv.
-
@Stargazer any context? or just a random post about a season 14 years ago?
-
@Kiwiwomble Totally random. They have more posts like that.
-
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@antipodean said in Super Rugby 2023:
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Winger Posting Reason is an insta ban isn't it?
it's not a bad article actually
Actually it's much better than that. It's bang on the money.
We complain about the Herald who are nothing more than NZR's marketing branch and obsequious journos. This is the type of contrarian article we should be supporting. Nothing kills a competition more than predictable (don't look at my tipping) outcomes and one fucking team constantly winning it.
And having the ball in play more actually exacerbates the problem. They're fixing the wrong things at the wrong level.
SR should be competitive between teams.
Tests are the ones needing more time in play to reduce the behemoth turgidity.
On this point, the Crusaders are essentially playing their C team this week and they're still fielding more ABs than the Highlanders. That's fucked up. Clearly their are contracting improvements that can be made that spread the NZ talent around ...
they were Crusaders before they became All Blacks, it's not like they were brought in from elsewhere, how many of them were no-names before they were developed by them? Bridge was a guy didn't even make his school's 1st XV, didn't make any representative teams, was a labourer with no intention to play professionally and didn't get started until he was 21/22, George Bower was a Highlanders discard from their development squad, he was behind several players & unwanted by them - George Bell, Noah Hotham, Christian Lio-Willie, were all unwanted by the Highlanders also!
Also how about some context.
How many are currently mainstays? those players are mostly at Chiefs, Blues, Hurricanes, none of them (not even Richie) would make my All Black starting side going by form of past 2 seasons, & most are just fringe players like Ennor, Bower, etc..
just because someone is a capped player doesn't mean they're better than another who's coming through.
Marino Mikaele Tu'u, Cameron Millar, Folau Fakatava, Ayden Johnstone, Shannon Frizell, Andrew Makalio, Sam Gilbert, Pari Pari Parkinson, Jermaine Ainsley, Daniel Lienert-Brown, Saula Ma'u, Thomas Umaga-Jensen, Aaron Smith, Billy Harmon, Sean Withy, Ethan de Groot, Fabian Holland.
A number of these players 1) could've easily done a job for ABs 2) are already making AB squads, Or 3) will likely see capped in the future.
-
@kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2023:
they were Crusaders before they became All Blacks, it's not like they were brought in from elsewhere, how many of them were no-names before they were developed by them? (Bridge was a guy didn't even make his school's 1st XV, didn't make any representative teams, was a labourer with no intention to play professionally and didn't get started until he was 21/22,
And didn't it fucking show?
-
@kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2023:
Bridge was a guy didn't even make his school's 1st XV, didn't make any representative teams, was a labourer with no intention to play professionally and didn't get started until he was 21/22,
Huh? He made his 1st XV and played for Crusaders U20s.
Also, my post wasn't an attack on the Crusaders, it was on the structure that allows it to happen. Regardless of your list of players the simple fact is a very weakened Crusaders team has more ABs than the Highlanders. If one of the highlighted issues is a weakness in the competition (and as we have to compare everything to the NRL a lack of competitiveness in comparison) then it's a fair point to review the make up of our Super teams.
-
The Chiefs & Blues have just as many All Blacks in their squads, so why the emphasis on the Crusaders?
-
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2023:
Bridge was a guy didn't even make his school's 1st XV, didn't make any representative teams, was a labourer with no intention to play professionally and didn't get started until he was 21/22,
If one of the highlighted issues is a weakness in the competition (and as we have to compare everything to the NRL a lack of competitiveness in comparison) then it's a fair point to review the make up of our Super teams.
One of five NZ franchises, there has always been 1 poorly performing NZ side - relative to the others.
I wouldn't be surprised if Highlanders didn't lose a single game against Australian opposition going forward.
We beat the Brumbies 35-12 in Canberra & made the SRP final in 2021 - with a worse team on paper than we have currently.
-
@kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@antipodean said in Super Rugby 2023:
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Winger Posting Reason is an insta ban isn't it?
it's not a bad article actually
Actually it's much better than that. It's bang on the money.
We complain about the Herald who are nothing more than NZR's marketing branch and obsequious journos. This is the type of contrarian article we should be supporting. Nothing kills a competition more than predictable (don't look at my tipping) outcomes and one fucking team constantly winning it.
And having the ball in play more actually exacerbates the problem. They're fixing the wrong things at the wrong level.
SR should be competitive between teams.
Tests are the ones needing more time in play to reduce the behemoth turgidity.
On this point, the Crusaders are essentially playing their C team this week and they're still fielding more ABs than the Highlanders. That's fucked up. Clearly their are contracting improvements that can be made that spread the NZ talent around ...
they were Crusaders before they became All Blacks, it's not like they were brought in from elsewhere, how many of them were no-names before they were developed by them? Bridge was a guy didn't even make his school's 1st XV, didn't make any representative teams, was a labourer with no intention to play professionally and didn't get started until he was 21/22, George Bower was a Highlanders discard from their development squad, he was behind several players & unwanted by them - George Bell, Noah Hotham, Christian Lio-Willie, were all unwanted by the Highlanders also!
Also how about some context.
How many are currently mainstays? those players are mostly at Chiefs, Blues, Hurricanes, none of them (not even Richie) would make my All Black starting side going by form of past 2 seasons, & most are just fringe players like Ennor, Bower, etc..
just because someone is a capped player doesn't mean they're better than another who's coming through.
Marino Mikaele Tu'u, Cameron Millar, Folau Fakatava, Ayden Johnstone, Shannon Frizell, Andrew Makalio, Sam Gilbert, Pari Pari Parkinson, Jermaine Ainsley, Daniel Lienert-Brown, Saula Ma'u, Thomas Umaga-Jensen, Aaron Smith, Billy Harmon, Sean Withy, Ethan de Groot, Fabian Holland.
A number of these players 1) could've easily done a job for ABs 2) are already making AB squads, Or 3) will likely see capped in the future.
From the quote below, its clear that the Landers didn’t want Lio Willie. WTF are you on about?
He jumped after getting the call from Razor.
That could make it a fixture perfect to start new Highlanders loose forward Christian Lio-Willie, who had a strong impact off the bench on debut against the Brumbies, but Dermody hinted they would be patient with the development of a player who has the potential to be a key Highlander for years to come. “We're stoked for Christian,” Dermody said. “He’s been with us all year and obviously broke his thumb in the preseason, which ruled him out for a long time. “We're excited with what he can do, and looking forward to getting him opportunity when it suits. “He's not a young guy, in his mid 20s, but he hasn’t played a lot of rugby at this level. “But, I think everyone can see the talent he’s got around the collision stuff. He's grown his game a lot in the last four or five months with us. There’s definitely a lot of upside for him.” -
@kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2023:
he was behind several players & unwanted by them - George Bell, Noah Hotham, Christian Lio-Willie, were all unwanted by the Highlanders also!
Is this right? I guess the Highlanders have two quality half backs already but with Smith leaving next year it seems incredible if they didn't want a quality third HB
Were they wnated but just not enough. Like Patafilo who was offered a contract but I've read was a joke amount of money. But who knows if true or not.
-
-
@kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2023:
The Chiefs & Blues have just as many All Blacks in their squads, so why the emphasis on the Crusaders?
why does it matter? its the example that sparked @Nepia 's thought, it could have been one of the other teams but it obviously occurred to him watching that game
-
See one of things I enjoy about the comp is the fact everyone in the club from the very top down to coaches, players developments systems etc have to be good. Some are better than others , and OK some players are attracted to better performing teams etc, but that just helps with the comp. Now the idea of evening up teams like through drafts etc , just tends to almost encourage teams to not go well once they realsie thay can't win, as lower down they are the better picks they get. Against all I think should happen in the game!
-
@Winger said in Super Rugby 2023:
@gt12 said in Super Rugby 2023:
From the quote below, its clear that the Landers didn’t want Lio Willie
Did?
Sarcasm filter.
There is no evidence that the Landers didn't want Lio Willie, or Hotham (they'd be mad not to have tried to sign him), or Bell (scholarship to Lincoln with Crusaders academy).
Stuff
