SF Crusaders v Chiefs
-
-
@taniwharugby said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Crucial it's more that there is little actual game commentary.
People seem to only comment about the ref or if a player fucks up, and now and again, they do something good
I watched a couple of decades-old games on Youtube a few weeks back and was struck how much info and insight the commentators (and sometimes a side-kick) gave back then compared to the 4-5 man teams we have now
Sometimes less is more.
-
Jordan's defence is very good so far.
-
It's a real shame the chiefs butchered those 2 tries earlier.... Different game entirely had they finished them..
Maybe it's a 14pt wind? -
-
@antipodean said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
Jordan's defence is very good so far.
He's fucking awesome, best player on the field by miles
-
-
@Donsteppa said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Nepia said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
Would the Chiefs be better if they just removed Gatland and Ioane?
Well, Tiatia at first five would certainly be interesting... like DMac on his most random of random days
I said remove them, no need to replace them with Tiatia.
-
PGS going from bad to worse.
Anyone calling for Zach Gallagher to be in contention should have a cold bath and re-watch his effort in this game.
-
-
Sami T is playing a blinder, IMHO.
-
@Nepia said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Donsteppa said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Nepia said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
Would the Chiefs be better if they just removed Gatland and Ioane?
Well, Tiatia at first five would certainly be interesting... like DMac on his most random of random days
I said remove them, no need to replace them with Tiatia.
Playing with 13.... it's a bold strategy!
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
Sami T is playing a blinder, IMHO.
Brodie quietly going about his work as a tight lock too.
