• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SF Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
589 Posts 53 Posters 26.5k Views
SF Crusaders v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #312

    Hall does well on his exit, where was that from the Chiefs in the first half?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #313

    Would the Chiefs be better if they just removed Gatland and Ioane?

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #314

    @taniwharugby said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Crucial it's more that there is little actual game commentary.

    People seem to only comment about the ref or if a player fucks up, and now and again, they do something good

    I watched a couple of decades-old games on Youtube a few weeks back and was struck how much info and insight the commentators (and sometimes a side-kick) gave back then compared to the 4-5 man teams we have now

    Sometimes less is more.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #315

    Jordan's defence is very good so far.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    wrote on last edited by
    #316

    It's a real shame the chiefs butchered those 2 tries earlier.... Different game entirely had they finished them..
    Maybe it's a 14pt wind?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #317

    @Nepia said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Would the Chiefs be better if they just removed Gatland and Ioane?

    Well, Tiatia at first five would certainly be interesting... like DMac on his most random of random days 🙂

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #318

    @antipodean said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Jordan's defence is very good so far.

    He's fucking awesome, best player on the field by miles

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #319

    Was that not a penalty advantage?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #320

    Chiefs just seem to struggle with backline play.

    YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #321

    Crusaders kicking game is just so much better. Plus they have Jordan to return our shit kicks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #322

    @chimoaus mediocre back 3 and our 10s throw stupid passes

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #323

    @Donsteppa said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Nepia said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Would the Chiefs be better if they just removed Gatland and Ioane?

    Well, Tiatia at first five would certainly be interesting... like DMac on his most random of random days 🙂

    I said remove them, no need to replace them with Tiatia. 😉

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #324

    PGS going from bad to worse.

    Anyone calling for Zach Gallagher to be in contention should have a cold bath and re-watch his effort in this game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #325

    I was surprised by some of the talk mid-season about Nankivell, PGS, and the All Blacks squad. And I still am...

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #326

    Jordan showing we really need to consider Jordie at 12.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #327

    I think the Chiefs all took dumbarse pills on their flight down to Chch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    wrote on last edited by
    #328

    Sami T is playing a blinder, IMHO.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #329

    @Nepia said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Donsteppa said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Nepia said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Would the Chiefs be better if they just removed Gatland and Ioane?

    Well, Tiatia at first five would certainly be interesting... like DMac on his most random of random days 🙂

    I said remove them, no need to replace them with Tiatia. 😉

    Playing with 13.... it's a bold strategy!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #330

    How is that a turn over, that was a ruck

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #331

    @Victor-Meldrew said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Sami T is playing a blinder, IMHO.

    Brodie quietly going about his work as a tight lock too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

SF Crusaders v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.