Blues v Canes

[hydro11]

<p>Controversy.</p>

[antipodean]

<p>WTF is the TMO talking about?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>He clearly knocked it forward. That's why you have slow-mo you retard.</p>

[taniwharugby]

<p>Ref - so you are happy with the pick up by 7 gold</p>
<p>TMO - in real time he picked it up cleanly</p>
<p> </p>
<p>BUt with use of technology, he didnt....?</p>

[Canerbry]

<p>OOOOOOh cuntriversial.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm amazed the commentators were right.</p>

[taniwharugby]

<p>oh, so he isnt playing knock ons tonight</p>

[taniwharugby]

<p>if that pass is good, that is farking outstanding from Li</p>

[dingo]

<p>In "real time" is the ball forward?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Shit yes.</p>

[taniwharugby]

<p>maybe they should be looking at this in real time too</p>

[Glath]

<p>In real time that pass is backwards ref.</p>

[antipodean]

<p>Brilliant run but I think that last pass is forward, but only in slow-mo</p>

[taniwharugby]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="563982" data-time="1457682908">
<div>
<p>Brilliant run but I think that last pass is forward, but only in slow-mo</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>real time it was flat to me...</p>

[Donsteppa]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="563980" data-time="1457682896"><p>maybe they should be looking at this in real time too</p></blockquote>
<br>
And in real time, it would be forward. <br><br>
Blues should be worrying less about the TMO, and more about not putting themselves under pressure with penalties.

[taniwharugby]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="563984" data-time="1457682986">
<div>
<p>And in real time, it would be forward.<br><br>
Blues should be worrying less about the TMO, and more about not putting themselves under pressure with penalties.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>as was the knock before...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But yeah the Blues have been shite.</p>

[Crucial]

What's this in real time stuff anyway? If you are going to ignore clear evidence of a knock on in slomo the you can't slomo a line ball. <br>
It has to be clear and obvious either way.

[Donsteppa]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="563985" data-time="1457683033"><p>as was the knock before...<br>
 <br>
But yeah the Blues have been shite.</p></blockquote>
<br>
Yep, <br><br>
Dumb arse #1 flies into a ruck with his shoulder<br>
Dumb arse #2 plays the opposition in the air at the resulting lineout<br><br>
If you're then having to find the tiniest of possible knock ons in slow mo to save you from a try, then you're in for a season as long as the non-scrumming Chiefs.

[No Quarter]

That was bizzare logic from the refs and comms. A lot of things look good in real time. Obvious knock on.<br><br>
Awesome no-try from Li, man that kid has wheels.

[Crucial]

Don't get me wrong. I have long advocated for all rulings to be in real time but if you are going to frame by frame the grounding of a ball I don't see why a knock on gets different treatment.

[taniwharugby]

<p>dunno, the comms in this game used it, then the TMO did in awarding the try...?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Agree, do not use slow mo if you are using 'real time' as the measure, am sure Sky would prefer that as they wouldnt need to do it in HD</p>

[Donsteppa]

Maybe I'm being a dinosaur, but my first thought was that the Canes "knock on" would always have been a try in the pre-TMO era.

[kiwiinmelb]

Blues look better when they get their pick and drive going