• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Blues v Canes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
blueshurricanes
183 Posts 41 Posters 16.8k Views
Blues v Canes
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CanerbryC Offline
    CanerbryC Offline
    Canerbry
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    <p>OOOOOOh cuntriversial.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I'm amazed the commentators were right.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    <p>oh, so he isnt playing knock ons tonight</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #55

    <p>if that pass is good, that is farking outstanding from Li</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    <p>In "real time" is the ball forward?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Shit yes.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    <p>maybe they should be looking at this in real time too</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Glath
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    <p>In real time that pass is backwards ref.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #59

    <p>Brilliant run but I think that last pass is forward, but only in slow-mo</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="563982" data-time="1457682908">
    <div>
    <p>Brilliant run but I think that last pass is forward, but only in slow-mo</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>real time it was flat to me...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="563980" data-time="1457682896"><p>maybe they should be looking at this in real time too</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    And in real time, it would be forward. <br><br>
    Blues should be worrying less about the TMO, and more about not putting themselves under pressure with penalties.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="563984" data-time="1457682986">
    <div>
    <p>And in real time, it would be forward.<br><br>
    Blues should be worrying less about the TMO, and more about not putting themselves under pressure with penalties.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>as was the knock before...</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>But yeah the Blues have been shite.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    What's this in real time stuff anyway? If you are going to ignore clear evidence of a knock on in slomo the you can't slomo a line ball. <br>
    It has to be clear and obvious either way.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="563985" data-time="1457683033"><p>as was the knock before...<br>
     <br>
    But yeah the Blues have been shite.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Yep, <br><br>
    Dumb arse #1 flies into a ruck with his shoulder<br>
    Dumb arse #2 plays the opposition in the air at the resulting lineout<br><br>
    If you're then having to find the tiniest of possible knock ons in slow mo to save you from a try, then you're in for a season as long as the non-scrumming Chiefs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #65

    That was bizzare logic from the refs and comms. A lot of things look good in real time. Obvious knock on.<br><br>
    Awesome no-try from Li, man that kid has wheels.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    Don't get me wrong. I have long advocated for all rulings to be in real time but if you are going to frame by frame the grounding of a ball I don't see why a knock on gets different treatment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    <p>dunno, the comms in this game used it, then the TMO did in awarding the try...?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Agree, do not use slow mo if you are using 'real time' as the measure, am sure Sky would prefer that as they wouldnt need to do it in HD</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #68

    Maybe I'm being a dinosaur, but my first thought was that the Canes "knock on" would always have been a try in the pre-TMO era.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #69

    Blues look better when they get their pick and drive going

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #70

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="563988" data-time="1457683245">
    <div>
    <p>If you're then having to find the tiniest of possible knock ons in slow mo to save you from a try, then you're in for a season as long as the non-scrumming Chiefs.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>??</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>It isnt about saving anything, a small knock on is the same as a big knock on, still a knock on.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>You just want decisions correct and consistent, and that is apparently what the technology is there for.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #71

    <p>The Hurricanes one was 50/50. The Blues one was clearly forward. You can disagree with the decisions made but they weren't analogous.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="563988" data-time="1457683245"><p>Yep, <br><br>
    Dumb arse #1 flies into a ruck with his shoulder<br>
    Dumb arse #2 plays the opposition in the air at the resulting lineout<br><br>
    If you're then having to find the tiniest of possible knock ons in slow mo to save you from a try, then you're in for a season as long as the non-scrumming Chiefs.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    I'm neutral in this. The Blues have been crap at times but I am commenting only on the incident in question, not looking for excuses. <br>
    That knock on was clear and obvious in slomo. That's how it should have been called.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Blues v Canes
Rugby Matches
blueshurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.