Crusaders v Blues
-
Right call
-
@mariner4life said in Crusaders v Blues:
@machpants said in Crusaders v Blues:
@mariner4life said in Crusaders v Blues:
@machpants said in Crusaders v Blues:
@donsteppa said in Crusaders v Blues:
@mariner4life said in Crusaders v Blues:
Scott Barrett
Desperately limited player who tries to make up for it by boneheaded "hard man" red cards
Just fucking ordinary and amongst the worst long term AB squad members I remember seeing
He's a name that's long overdue to be posted in the Exodus thread to avoid giving Foster the selection temptation yet again.
He's been the best lock in NZ this year
Not the flex you think it is
After watching this guy fail over and over at test level
If he's top of the tree we are fucking boned at lock. boned
But it is the truth. He can be excellent, often is. But can also be dumb as fuck
Excellent? Never
Adequate? Sometimes
Disagree, he's been very very good in patches, this and last year
-
@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Blues:
Gallagher doesn't look out of place at this level. For a young fella he has done bloody well.
Willis II on target.
-
Great game so far, loving the unicorn moments by changing a couple of laws like bringing in the 50/22, those rarities like George Bridge beating a defender on the outside can change a game, luckily for the Blues it is not a frequent occurrence
-
Eklunds throwing.been a bit wobbly tonight
-
-
Surely not….
-
@hydro11 said in Crusaders v Blues:
@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
This is the standard of reffing I'm used to.
Obstruction, forward pass, knock on.
Ignore, ignore, ignore.
If it is Havili it should be fine. Saders got no advantage out of it.
😂
Brilliant
-
