• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
235 Posts 38 Posters 9.4k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #222

    @crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @crazy-horse it was a forward for the canes, I remember because Nisbo (who is remarkably even worse this season), commented on how the player is going to have even more strapping added to his legs.

    He had strapping on his thighs for lifters.

    Could have sworn it was a back. Are we talking about the same instance? I stand to be corrected but the time I am talking about is when the Cane's player got his ankle strapped. My terrible memory tells me it was someone like Proctor. The ref told him to hurry up so he jumped to his feet only to find the game had been held up by an injured Crusader. He then went down again and got his ankle strapped while the ref talked to the two captains about speeding up injury stoppages.

    Now I am worried I have the wrong game!

    Yep bang on Crazy, it was Proctor, and then ref saw Cullen from Crusaders was injured.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #223

    @crazy-horse I'm the one with the wrong game then!

    Sets a stall out for the other teams though eh, at least everyone knows. No injuries unless a crusaders player is injured...

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #224

    @bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @crazy-horse I'm the one with the wrong game then!

    Sets a stall out for the other teams though eh, at least everyone knows. No injuries unless a crusaders player is injured...

    The way it should be.

    O 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #225

    @chris He has finally seen the light!

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Old Samurai Jack on last edited by
    #226

    @old-samurai-jack said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris He has finally seen the light!

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #227

    @yeetyaah said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    7 penalties to 1. Crusaders still as cyncial as ever.

    And loving it.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by Chris
    #228

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @yeetyaah said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    7 penalties to 1. Crusaders still as cyncial as ever.

    And loving it.

    And Pickerall still as shit as he always has been.

    He’s just picking on our team 😎

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #229

    @chris his name kinda indicates he's picking on all

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #230

    @bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris his name kinda indicates he's picking on all

    Exactly

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #231

    Just watched first half. Canes right on top. Crazy score at 16-12. Chch didn't do much right, one try ought to have been ruled out for forward pass, lucky only to have one in bin. Canes should have had at least 6 more on board. Canes 16 - Chch 5 would have been fairer reflection. Amazing!

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #232

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    Just watched first half. Canes right on top. Crazy score at 16-12. Chch didn't do much right, one try ought to have been ruled out for forward pass, lucky only to have one in bin. Canes should have had at least 6 more on board. Canes 16 - Chch 5 would have been fairer reflection. Amazing!

    So we came from 16-5 down to win? Makes the win that little bit more sweeter. Onwards and upwards. Get on the bandwagon, Tony Johnson certainly has πŸ˜‰

    CrucialC P 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #233

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    Just watched first half. Canes right on top. Crazy score at 16-12. Chch didn't do much right, one try ought to have been ruled out for forward pass, lucky only to have one in bin. Canes should have had at least 6 more on board. Canes 16 - Chch 5 would have been fairer reflection. Amazing!

    So we came from 16-5 down to win? Makes the win that little bit more sweeter. Onwards and upwards. Get on the bandwagon, Tony Johnson certainly has πŸ˜‰

    TJ is the over excited kid running alongside the bandwagon.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #234

    @crucial said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    Just watched first half. Canes right on top. Crazy score at 16-12. Chch didn't do much right, one try ought to have been ruled out for forward pass, lucky only to have one in bin. Canes should have had at least 6 more on board. Canes 16 - Chch 5 would have been fairer reflection. Amazing!

    So we came from 16-5 down to win? Makes the win that little bit more sweeter. Onwards and upwards. Get on the bandwagon, Tony Johnson certainly has πŸ˜‰

    TJ is the over excited kid running alongside the bandwagon.

    A homer from way back

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by pakman
    #235

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    Just watched first half. Canes right on top. Crazy score at 16-12. Chch didn't do much right, one try ought to have been ruled out for forward pass, lucky only to have one in bin. Canes should have had at least 6 more on board. Canes 16 - Chch 5 would have been fairer reflection. Amazing!

    So we came from 16-5 down to win? Makes the win that little bit more sweeter. Onwards and upwards. Get on the bandwagon, Tony Johnson certainly has πŸ˜‰

    Second half 26-20 to Chch. Hard to argue with too much with it. That said, had Ardie's try stood (thought the decision of no try was correct) doubt Canes would have leaked those quick tries.

    Had Canes taken their chances they would have won, but that's rugby.

    Take aways for me:

    • Canes backline play electric;

    • Jordie MOTM for me; but

    • Chch pack (maul especially) is their matchwinner.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Hurricanes
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.