• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Springboks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.9k Posts 92 Posters 222.2k Views
All Blacks vs Springboks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by taniwharugby
    #344

    @nostrildamus well @mn5 doesn't like the fact I dislike his dad and the utter tripe he writes, so posts links hoping I'll throw him a click.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by Stargazer
    #345

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    3 Barretts starting. Only second group of 3 brothers to be ABs?

    12 things about the Barrett boys

    Dammit, five years since that article and Rattue still hasn't added the third Brownlie brother!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #346

    Pretty happy with this team, considering the injuries.
    So Big Karl has now leapfrogged Bower at LHP. This was a tight contest between the two, I guess.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #347

    @cgrant said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Pretty happy with this team, considering the injuries.
    So Big Karl has now leapfrogged Bower at LHP. This was a tight contest between the two, I guess.

    Loose actually 😬

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #348

    @kiwimurph said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Interesting comments by Foz about the bench and picking those who had played the Boks before.

    Despite his half lidded eyes makin ghim look pissed, that was the most concise and articulate interview I've heard from him

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Machpants on last edited by MN5
    #349

    @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @kiwimurph said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Interesting comments by Foz about the bench and picking those who had played the Boks before.

    Despite his half lidded eyes makin ghim look pissed, that was the most concise and articulate interview I've heard from him

    Probably still in a food coma from the KFC at lunchtime

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #350

    @taniwharugby said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @nostrildamus well @mn5 doesn't like the fact I dislike his dad and the utter tripe he writes, so posts links hoping I'll throw him a click.

    Pffft as if my Dad could write as brilliantly as Rattue

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #351

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Jesus there some clueless comments here, not all of them, but these leapt out. More stuff to be up on the changing room walls 😜

    This is not the same team that won the World Cup. Let's be very clear on that. They've lost a number of their players who have headed off overseas

    SA freely pick from anywhere

    And two years ago, they were playing a lot more open and expansive rugby than this team is showing us this year."

    Obviously didn't watch the semi versus Wales

    The fullback is fine; Willie le Roux is a very good player

    Was

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/rugby-championship-former-all-blacks-coach-laurie-mains-reveals-reasons-behind-springboks-decline

    Is.

    'Rock bottom': Former All Blacks coach reveals reason behind Springboks' decline
    "Willie le Roux is a very good player"

    ā€œWillie le Roux was a very good playerā€ he has been average for quite sometime

    oh not arguing with that, I just couldn't find Mains saying that, he blamed the centre, props..

    I'm missing your point, he said the Le Roux is not a problem as he is a very good player. Which is utter rubbish, he was def a problem versus the Wallabies - he was responsible for a lot of the stiffled attack

    0ad2bb1a-0d76-472e-84b6-47fe3cfe8fd4-image.png

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #352

    Just watching the last game again and it occurred to me that this squad really doesn’t have much in the way of filler. Just about everyone is either performing or has done so.
    There are some obvious rankings among players but even those at third rank are performing well.
    Credit is due to the coaching staff and team leaders for what they have created as far as a squad and contest for spots.
    We have a hooker that wasn’t even in the proper squad but is now pushing the top spot IMO.
    Lomax is looking like he has found his feet. Sotutu has gone from being very average in NPC to playing well.
    Even with a lack of play guys are coming in from the training paddock in form.
    Whether the tactics etc end up being right is still to be seen but maybe Foster and co. Are doing some stuff right?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to JC on last edited by
    #353

    @jc said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    I'm amazed to find that Scott Barrett has nearly 50 tests under his belt. And we still think of him as the journeyman.

    Yeah that's fair. He's moved past rookie, or apprentice if we're to continue the metaphor, and not progressing to master yet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Bones on last edited by booboo
    #354

    @bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @canes4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Can't wait to see how that loose forward trio works together against a bigger Springbok pack.

    What?

    We're NZ. Bokke, Poms, Lions have bigger forward packs by definition.

    Ad an aside, has anyone got size, height, weight stats for us so I don't have to look up myself?

    CrucialC BonesB kiwiinmelbK 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #355

    @booboo Ardie is 7’6ā€

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #356

    @crucial cue abysmal performance from everyone this weekend.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #357

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @mn5 said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    3 Barretts starting. Only second group of 3 brothers to be ABs?

    12 things about the Barrett boys

    @taniwharugby Good article this one, great writer.

    I'm sorry, didn't check writer's name.
    My beef with him isn't that he's not a good writer, he just chose to be a troll (and not sure he actually likes rugby union anyway).

    Started as the loigue writer iirc

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #358

    @arhs said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    I'm a bit concerned with ALB and Papalii missing and the back 3 selection. Would have preferred Reece to Jordan. And didn't think Pat T had earned a place. Hopefully it motivates him because we have a high energy bench that could run boks off their feet.

    I’m interested to know what the concern is with Papali’i not being available. Is there that much of a difference between Paps and Jacobsen? Ardie was always going to be selected given he is captain.

    Is it because Jacobsen isn’t on the bench and Blackadder is? I think that’s relative given if things go to plan we will probably only see Blackadder for 10 or 15 max.

    boobooB A 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #359

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @act-crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @hooroo said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    i dont mind it

    I'm underwhelmed a bit but I don't know what I would change with no ALB. Can't argue with forwards though.

    Whilst still a work in progress, Ioane is the second best centre in the squad, so he has to play there.

    I would’ve gone for Reece on the wing, but can’t complain about the other two selected.

    Will be interesting if one of our wingers has to go off, will they put Tups on and move Ioane or do they put DMac on and move Jordie. If it’s early in the game I reckon the latter because of experience.

    Flakes did well against Boks when Hodge came on by having big boot to drive them back when kicking for territory.

    So Jordie for me to stay at 15. I’d bring on Quinn.

    I understand none of this post.

    BonesB P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by Bones
    #360

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @canes4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Can't wait to see how that loose forward trio works together against a bigger Springbok pack.

    What?

    We're NZ. Bokke, Poms, Lions have bigger forward packs by definition.

    Ad an aside, has anyone got size, height, weight stats for us so I don't have to look up myself?

    After my double take at after seeing that lazy repeat of an ancient stereotype I had a quick squizz. I mean come on, they have two opensides and one that's known for being small!

    Wikipedia has Duane at 118, Kolisi at 105 I think, Smith at 95 I think. Ioane at 116 and I stopped after that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #361

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @act-crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @hooroo said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    i dont mind it

    I'm underwhelmed a bit but I don't know what I would change with no ALB. Can't argue with forwards though.

    Whilst still a work in progress, Ioane is the second best centre in the squad, so he has to play there.

    I would’ve gone for Reece on the wing, but can’t complain about the other two selected.

    Will be interesting if one of our wingers has to go off, will they put Tups on and move Ioane or do they put DMac on and move Jordie. If it’s early in the game I reckon the latter because of experience.

    Flakes did well against Boks when Hodge came on by having big boot to drive them back when kicking for territory.

    So Jordie for me to stay at 15. I’d bring on Quinn.

    I understand none of this post.

    Flakes = Hodge

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #362

    @act-crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @arhs said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    I'm a bit concerned with ALB and Papalii missing and the back 3 selection. Would have preferred Reece to Jordan. And didn't think Pat T had earned a place. Hopefully it motivates him because we have a high energy bench that could run boks off their feet.

    I’m interested to know what the concern is with Papali’i not being available. Is there that much of a difference between Paps and Jacobsen? Ardie was always going to be selected given he is captain.

    Is it because Jacobsen isn’t on the bench and Blackadder is? I think that’s relative given if things go to plan we will probably only see Blackadder for 10 or 15 max.

    To my mind Papalii is a bit better than Blackadder so we're just a little tiny bit down on the sum of the parts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #363

    @bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @act-crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @hooroo said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    i dont mind it

    I'm underwhelmed a bit but I don't know what I would change with no ALB. Can't argue with forwards though.

    Whilst still a work in progress, Ioane is the second best centre in the squad, so he has to play there.

    I would’ve gone for Reece on the wing, but can’t complain about the other two selected.

    Will be interesting if one of our wingers has to go off, will they put Tups on and move Ioane or do they put DMac on and move Jordie. If it’s early in the game I reckon the latter because of experience.

    Flakes did well against Boks when Hodge came on by having big boot to drive them back when kicking for territory.

    So Jordie for me to stay at 15. I’d bring on Quinn.

    I understand none of this post.

    Flakes = Hodge

    Cadbury flakes = wallabies

    BonesB P 2 Replies Last reply
    3

All Blacks vs Springboks I
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.