• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies vs Springboks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
911 Posts 66 Posters 53.6k Views
Wallabies vs Springboks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #158

    @nostrildamus said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @pakman said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @bovidae said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @nta But compared to Quade?

    Well, yeah... I'm really not sure what is going on with that.

    Decidedly awkward interview but I thought Quade spoke very well (as an aside, his voice-sounds like SBW).

    He seems to have grown up.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #159

    @pakman yes. And I think the NZ fanboi reactions and cheapshots (from me too) obscure from his decided entertainment value as a 10. Might still be a defensive liability but has some great skills. Hope he plays well, have not followed his recent games overseas...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #160

    P KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    Frankly I thought Quade wasn't as bad as we made him out to be.

    But that was mainly because he wasn't as awesome as the Aussie's made him out to be.

    I think most of the opprobrium (my current favourite word) directed at him was a direct result of the overrating of him by the Aussie media (particularly the Fox Sport cheerleaders).

    Frankly I rate him as one of the better Aussie 10s in recent times.

    And he can tackle.

    Not sure what his current form is like.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #162

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    What do ex-props know?!

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #163

    @pakman said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    What do ex-props know?!

    Pretty much everything 🤷‍♂️

    Darwin's company does game and player analysis. http://www.gainline.biz/

    Interesting points around cohesion and the effect on performance

    M P 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #164

    @booboo huh, I never really realised he was hugely rated by Aussies, I thought all the grief he got was just because he was a dick.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #165

    More excited about this game than us vs the Bargies honestly.

    Really want to see if the Boss are the real deal (or the Lions were shit) ... and the QC selection just adds further spice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #166

    @bones said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @booboo huh, I never really realised he was hugely rated by Aussies, I thought all the grief he got was just because he was a dick.

    Didnt help

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #167

    The Quade hate thing was somewhat amusing but probably deserved after the knee to Richie McCaw's head.

    Tho in your collective role as Stoic Custodians Of The Game, you carried on with the booing long after it was probably necessary 🙂

    After the whole "he doesn't defend in the front line!" got going, nobody appeared to have an issue with every other 10 doing the same once the value of counterattack opportunities was understood.

    So it is a mixed bag.

    M KirwanK boobooB nzzpN 4 Replies Last reply
    4
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to NTA on last edited by Machpants
    #168

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    The Quade hate thing was somewhat amusing but probably deserved after the knee to Richie McCaw's head.

    Tho in your collective role as Stoic Custodians Of The Game, you carried on with the booing long after it was probably necessary 🙂

    After the whole "he doesn't defend in the front line!" got going, nobody appeared to have an issue with every other 10 doing the same once the value of counterattack opportunities was understood.

    So it is a mixed bag.

    For me the booing sort of ended up like calling out beeeeeeeaaaast, just the thing you do (yes kiwis did that in NZ). For most it was not malicious, just banter. Call yourself NZ rugby public enemy no 1, then you can't whine when you get treated like it.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #169

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    The Quade hate thing was somewhat amusing but probably deserved after the knee to Richie McCaw's head.

    Tho in your collective role as Stoic Custodians Of The Game, you carried on with the booing long after it was probably necessary 🙂

    After the whole "he doesn't defend in the front line!" got going, nobody appeared to have an issue with every other 10 doing the same once the value of counterattack opportunities was understood.

    So it is a mixed bag.

    The knee was the spark, but it continued because it had an effect on him. Home crowd shenanigans aren’t unique to us.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by NTA
    #170

    @kirwan said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    The knee was the spark, but it continued because it had an effect on him

    I think players expect a bit of shit to come their way and any supposed effect the booing had on Quade was more in the minds of the people doing it, based on whether he ended up playing well. More about his lack of consistency than any external factors. And if the rest of the Wallabies were putting in a poor performance, these things get exacerbated.

    I seem to remember a game in Dunedin where he was playing and kicking pretty well despite the booing, and even some Kiwis were rolling their eyes at the crowd behaviour. We still lost, mind.

    Home crowd shenanigans aren’t unique to us.

    Prefer Ireland's method of dealing with the kicker - dead silence. Is it respectful? Is it off-putting? Could be both.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #171

    I should add that I've never been Quade's biggest fan - but have a grudging respect for him based on a couple of interactions during our ill-fated dive into a National Rugby Championship.

    I think this move by Rennie is more to protect Lolesio from the Boks than anything.

    Hodge might have been the simpler option at 10.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #172

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    Hodge might have been the simpler option at 10.

    This was what I expected, Vs big bad boks

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Machpants on last edited by NTA
    #173

    @machpants said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    Hodge might have been the simpler option at 10.

    This was what I expected, Vs big bad boks

    Would probably limit the Wallabies to a form of attack that the Boks would love tho, so perhaps it is a double-negative.

    What Argentina and the Lions lacked was movement around and off the ball to create uncertainty for the Bok defense. Wallabies need to have a bit of subtlety and a shitload of support, because they don't have the pace to outrun them after any line breaks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Machpants on last edited by booboo
    #174

    @machpants said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    The Quade hate thing was somewhat amusing but probably deserved after the knee to Richie McCaw's head.

    Tho in your collective role as Stoic Custodians Of The Game, you carried on with the booing long after it was probably necessary 🙂

    After the whole "he doesn't defend in the front line!" got going, nobody appeared to have an issue with every other 10 doing the same once the value of counterattack opportunities was understood.

    So it is a mixed bag.

    For me the booing sort of ended up like calling out beeeeeeeaaaast, just the thing you do (yes kiwis did that in NZ). For most it was not malicious, just banter. Call yourself NZ rugby public enemy no 1, then you can't whine when you get treated like it.

    If you recall he was actually named Public Enemy No. 2, behind ...

    ... (Not at that stage Sir) Graham Henry.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #175

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    The Quade hate thing was somewhat amusing but probably deserved after the knee to Richie McCaw's head.

    Tho in your collective role as Stoic Custodians Of The Game, you carried on with the booing long after it was probably necessary 🙂

    After the whole "he doesn't defend in the front line!" got going, nobody appeared to have an issue with every other 10 doing the same once the value of counterattack opportunities was understood.

    So it is a mixed bag.

    We know where the line is.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #176

    @nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    @kirwan said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:

    The knee was the spark, but it continued because it had an effect on him

    I think players expect a bit of shit to come their way and any supposed effect the booing had on Quade was more in the minds of the people doing it, based on whether he ended up playing well. More about his lack of consistency than any external factors. And if the rest of the Wallabies were putting in a poor performance, these things get exacerbated.

    I seem to remember a game in Dunedin where he was playing and kicking pretty well despite the booing, and even some Kiwis were rolling their eyes at the crowd behaviour. We still lost, mind.

    Home crowd shenanigans aren’t unique to us.

    Prefer Ireland's method of dealing with the kicker - dead silence. Is it respectful? Is it off-putting? Could be both.

    The times I was at the ground the booing always ended in laughter when directed at Quade, because we all knew it was part of the entertainment.

    I dislike Ireland’s method because they’re so fucking smug and moral about it - and it’s a tactic now because they know it unnerves some players. In the vids thread we’ve had the Good, The Bad, and the Rugby pop up and the abuse from Irish spectators in that is off the charts nasty.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #177

    Quade appeared to relish his bad boy persona, and that just added to the theatre for the crowd

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Wallabies vs Springboks I
Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.