• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
575 Posts 61 Posters 33.8k Views
SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by Donsteppa
    #58

    @bovidae said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    I don't think Trask did himself any favours against the Blues. He spilled a few under the high ball and threw some poor passes, albeit playing at fullback.

    Yep. That he was at fullback probably impressed Clayton even less, given that's where he played him all NPC.

    @bovidae said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    and Stevenson ahead of Tiatia in the reserves. Tiatia is the coaches pet though.

    Either that, or that Stevenson runs even more hot and cold than Tiatia πŸ™‚

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #59

    Would've thought that Chiefs would have gone for it and put DMac at 10. Gatland is a big step down.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Yeahtheboys on last edited by
    #60

    @yeahtheboys said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Also interesting they keep Jacobson at 8 (usually a 6) and PGS at 6 (usually an 8). Is this calls from higher up to give LJ more time at 8 for later in the year?

    LJ has played at 8 the last part of the comp hasn't he? Made a bloody good fist of it too, so I reckon it is a good move to leave him there even with PGS.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    https://www.tab.co.nz/sports/event/900818/rugby-union/super-rugby-aotearoa/super-rugby-aotearoa/crusaders-v-chiefs

    Crusaders $1.24
    Chiefs $3.70

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #62

    @crazy-horse said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @yeahtheboys said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Also interesting they keep Jacobson at 8 (usually a 6) and PGS at 6 (usually an 8). Is this calls from higher up to give LJ more time at 8 for later in the year?

    LJ has played at 8 the last part of the comp hasn't he? Made a bloody good fist of it too, so I reckon it is a good move to leave him there even with PGS.

    I was going to ask if LJ played 8, it would be a good idea regards AB positions...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #63

    @chris-b said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    I thought they might go with Ennor's greater experience over Leicester's match play, but not a big surprise that they didn't.

    The legend of Ennor really has grown hugely while he's been injured eh. He's not exactly some old vet! Only really one season over Faingaanuku.

    Out of interest it's a 2 hour drive from Braydon to Leicester.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #64

    @donsteppa said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @bovidae said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    and Stevenson ahead of Tiatia in the reserves. Tiatia is the coaches pet though.

    Either that, or that Stevenson runs even more hot and cold than Tiatia πŸ™‚

    Yeah. Stevenson hasn't moved to BOP yet. πŸ˜‰

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Yeahtheboys on last edited by Bovidae
    #65

    @yeahtheboys said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Also interesting they keep Jacobson at 8 (usually a 6) and PGS at 6 (usually an 8). Is this calls from higher up to give LJ more time at 8 for later in the year?

    McMillan did say at the start of SRA that they prefer Jacobson at no.8 so he can get his hands on the ball more. PGS can also have some handling errors off the back of the scrum. Or near the goal line. 😠

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #66

    @bovidae has he got English heritage? Could be the next Eddie selection.

    YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #67

    @bovidae said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @donsteppa said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @bovidae said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    and Stevenson ahead of Tiatia in the reserves. Tiatia is the coaches pet though.

    Either that, or that Stevenson runs even more hot and cold than Tiatia πŸ™‚

    Yeah. Stevenson hasn't moved to BOP yet. πŸ˜‰

    Exactly. Failed to follow coach's instructions πŸ™‚

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Online
    YeetyaahY Online
    Yeetyaah
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #68

    @bones I mean he is from Cambridge.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #69

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #70

    I suspect both Crusaders and Chiefs fans are very relaxed about today’s final. Chiefs fans should have zero expectations and Crusaders fans would think they will be quite comfortable for them?

    I hope it’s a tight game and we put up a decent challenge.

    nzzpN SiamS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #71

    @hooroo said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    I hope it’s a tight game and we put up a decent challenge.

    The lack of posts here this week suggest it's a done deal to be fair. Never lsot a home playoff game ... not starting now against this Chiefs team.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #72

    @nzzp said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @hooroo said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    I hope it’s a tight game and we put up a decent challenge.

    The lack of posts here this week suggest it's a done deal to be fair. Never lsot a home playoff game ... not starting now against this Chiefs team.

    Sadly, that’s how I see it. We have exceeded expectations getting to the final.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #73

    Nah. I reckon we are right in this. If we win it won’t be pretty it will be a scrappy disruptive affair with scrambling defence and broken play tries.
    I just feel that the Chiefs will have a stronger fight in them. They are a really tight unit now that will fight hard for each other.
    I have faith.

    StargazerS Dan54D 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #74

    @crucial That's what I expect, too. A close, maybe scrappy, game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Crucial on last edited by Dan54
    #75

    @crucial said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Nah. I reckon we are right in this. If we win it won’t be pretty it will be a scrappy disruptive affair with scrambling defence and broken play tries.
    I just feel that the Chiefs will have a stronger fight in them. They are a really tight unit now that will fight hard for each other.
    I have faith.

    πŸ˜– Geez crucial, I owe you a huge apology, I just quickly saw the red and black logo you had , never really did anymore than glance at it, and thought you a Crusaders manπŸ™„ . I should look properly, and my father would be disgusted with me (if he was still alive), he a Counties man and his dad had a bit to do with setting up Counties or South Auckland as it was originally known.πŸ™„

    Should of known , your posts to reasonable to be a Crusaders man.πŸ˜›

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #76

    Anyway ,I think Crsaders would be firm favourites, but there one thing anyone who follows NZ rugby should always remember, players don't gaive a stuff who is favourite, and I really expect the Chiefs to tear into this big time!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #77

    @dan54 said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @crucial said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Nah. I reckon we are right in this. If we win it won’t be pretty it will be a scrappy disruptive affair with scrambling defence and broken play tries.
    I just feel that the Chiefs will have a stronger fight in them. They are a really tight unit now that will fight hard for each other.
    I have faith.

    πŸ˜– Geez crucial, I owe you a huge apology, I just quickly saw the red and black logo you had , never really did anymore than glance at it, and thought you a Crusaders manπŸ™„ . I should look properly, and my father would be disgusted with me (if he was still alive), he a Counties man and his dad had a bit to do with setting up Counties or South Auckland as it was originally known.πŸ™„

    Should of known , your posts to reasonable to be a Crusaders man.πŸ˜›

    I'm not reasonable at all when it comes to Cantabs. 1982 still hurts. I blame Deans.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.