• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
256 Posts 51 Posters 9.4k Views
SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by pakman
    #243

    Thought Aidan Ross was good. Chiefs had wood on Chch in scrums, but ref pretty disinterested. Big step down at LH from Moody to Bower.

    Chiefs had watched Southern derby tape, with one off runners angling back towards ruck, or DMac reversing the play and receiver doing that on other side.

    Result was that Chiefs got a lot of quick ball. Saders couldn' close things down in their usual fashion.

    Hope you were taking notes, Panadol!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #244

    Chiefs were on to something with the way McKenzie kept swiftly changing the direction of the attack with sharp flat passes to stretch the defence. It made the defenders work harder than usual.
    Yes Ah Kuoi had a huge game and Jacobson Ross Taukeiaho and Boshier huge shifts as well.
    Chiefs just need to address their achilles heel of giving away soft penalties to gift opponents a driving maul 5 to 10 metres out.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #245

    Thought DMac was ๐Ÿ‘Œat 10. I know heโ€™s had some mares in that position but Iโ€™ve always felt he has what it takes to be a very good flyhalf. Hopefully that trend continues.

    Oh yeah and congrats Chiefs. Gatland is still a cnut though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #246

    @act-crusader Tupaea isn't an All Black yet but yes it puts perspective with him Sam Cane Retallick and ONeill and Moli missing and lots of second stringers in there

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #247

    @act-crusader said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders

    We were underdogs in this match. Did you hear we had an AB prop, lock and centre missing. Did you see our tight 5.

    Oops. Just realised you were talking about Crusaders.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • S Do not disturb
    S Do not disturb
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by Steven Harris
    #248

    One of the better games this season in terms of skill and the way the game was officiated ..
    I thought the Chiefs were good value for their win and whilst people will point to personal not being available, the Chiefs know all about injuries so we can safely park that one up .

    This game reminded me of the Blues encounter at the same venue , with the visitors trying to bully the hosts , but I thought it was the hosts that played all the code , just their own momentum stopping them from either scoring or applying even more pressure..

    From 1-8 the chiefs pack were superb , where as the Crusaders pack went in fits and starts , only Tom Sanders really shinning to me and in the backs Jordon and Mounga the only real genuine threats .
    Even though the chiefs left it late, I thought the final score actually flattered the visitors ..although I do reckon the Mounga missed conversion from a handy position proved very costly at match ends ..

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #249

    @arhs said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Chiefs just need to address their achilles heel of giving away soft penalties to gift opponents a driving maul 5 to 10 metres out.

    In other words, talk to Mitch Brown. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #250

    Thought McKenzie looked good at 10.
    His transference was very quick and he changed the angle of attack several times.
    There was no Beauden Barrett labored shoveling it on that I saw.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #251

    @frank said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Thought McKenzie looked good at 10.
    His transference was very quick and he changed the angle of attack several times.
    There was no Beauden Barrett labored shoveling it on that I saw.

    The biggest thing to note was the decision making. Not perfect but thatโ€™s a hard ask for any 10. Mostly right decisions and no brain fart ones.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • O Online
    O Online
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #252

    The way both teams dealt with the breakdown seemed completely different. The Crusaders were happy to concede a lot and fan across in defense. The Chiefs put numbers in there and there were numerous hands competing for the ball. I wonder if the Chiefs would have been penalized more with a different ref.
    Great game, with some of the ABs coming into some form.

    CrucialC NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Old Samurai Jack on last edited by
    #253

    @old-samurai-jack said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    The way both teams dealt with the breakdown seemed completely different. The Crusaders were happy to concede a lot and fan across in defense. The Chiefs put numbers in there and there were numerous hands competing for the ball. I wonder if the Chiefs would have been penalized more with a different ref.
    Great game, with some of the ABs coming into some form.

    Goes both ways. Another ref may also have penalised the Crusaders for flopping.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #254

    @crucial most refs are ignoring that this season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #255

    Scott Barrett is dumb as a bag of hammers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Old Samurai Jack on last edited by
    #256

    @old-samurai-jack said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    The way both teams dealt with the breakdown seemed completely different. The Crusaders were happy to concede a lot and fan across in defense. The Chiefs put numbers in there and there were numerous hands competing for the ball. I wonder if the Chiefs would have been penalized more with a different ref.

    Maybe initially - but you always push the boundaries and see where the line is.

    Problem is when the line changes mid-game ๐Ÿ˜

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.