• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
593 Posts 66 Posters 34.2k Views
Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #529

    @Duluth I think they wanted to convert to a premium subscription platform, but it ain't happening.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #530

    @Tim especially if we're not doing anything different to "sell" the ABs...there are definitely out there that will just jump on a bandwagon (T swift and the chiefs)....but you have to do...something...to sell it to them...have we tried introducing Taylor to scooter?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #531

    @Tim

    Yet the NZRPA supported this deal didn't they. That's looking more and more like a total disaster

    Maybe the NZR Board members responsible for it should all resign. As should anyone else who supported it. Although if it's as bad as it seems to be it's too late now. As its unlikely there is any way to get out of it

    KiwiwombleK TimT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #532

    @Winger that would be dependant on what they were sold, if silver lake isn't doing what they said they would to grow things then THEY should be held to account

    TimT WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Winger on last edited by Tim
    #533

    @Winger said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

    Yet the NZRPA supported this deal didn't they.

    They were very sceptical of it, and forced a review of the deal. That lead to a reduction of the revenue share sold to Silver Lake, which was sold at a much higher price.

    I wouldn't blame the NZRPA for this deal. They wanted NZR to explore raising money locally instead.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by Tim
    #534

    @Kiwiwomble Holding a well-funded US private equity firm to "account". Not easy!

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #535

    @Kiwiwomble said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

    @Winger that would be dependant on what they were sold, if silver lake isn't doing what they said they would to grow things then THEY should be held to account

    But so what? I doubt if there is a clause to cancel the agreement if SL doesn't perform. I kind of think NZR might have been taken for fools. Just on the little I have read on it. So, it could in fact be a wonderful deal.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #536

    @Tim very true....but at very least the poor semi amature PU board members shouldnt be punished if it was to be found silverlake had dropped the ball

    WingerW 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by Winger
    #537

    @Kiwiwomble said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

    found silverlake had dropped the ball

    Thye haven't though. From their viewpoint. It's a small up-front investment for guaranteed ongoing good returns it seems.

    I just hope its not as terrible as it seems from NZR viewpoint. 7.5% is a lot of money to loss year after year

    poor semi amature PU board members shouldn't be punished

    Aren't 6 out of 9 appointed. So, they shouldn't be incompetent. But if proven to be just that they should go. Along with the 3 too. We don't want fools on the board of NZ rugby

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #538

    @Winger my understanding of the deal was they had actions in growing the revenue too, it wasn't a straight equity injection (we give you some money and you give us some profit later), silverlake sold the idea of tapping into new revenue streams they had access too...and we havent seen any of that

    WingerW Dan54D K 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #539

    @Kiwiwomble said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

    silverlake sold the idea of tapping into new revenue streams they had access too...and we havent seen any of that

    Fine. And NZ rugby might not ever see it. But what then? Is there a remedy for NZR?

    I don't know so I suppose I shouldn't criticise, I guess. But I'm starting to feel uneasy about this SL buy-in. Esp as the Board has bene publicly criticized as not fit for purpose. And the recent Board makeup proposal by NZR was truly awful.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #540

    @Winger said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

    .... But I'm starting to feel uneasy about this SL buy-in....

    i think we all are, i just dont think we can jump on the PU board members for fing up until we know for sure whats gone on, could also be big bad american private equity firm takes advantage of well meaning amateurs

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #541

    @Kiwiwomble said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

    @Winger my understanding of the deal was they had actions in growing the revenue too, it wasn't a straight equity injection (we give you some money and you give us some profit later), silverlake sold the idea of tapping into new revenue streams they had access too...and we havent seen any of that

    Aren't we hoping for a lot if we think these new revenure streams would be instant? I genuinely doubt whether SL wanted to just have a stake in NZR with no thoughts etc and ideas that it was going to get bigger. I think you can see it with leaning toward more games towards USA etc, and especially Asia. I actually think we will see even more games from MAB etc happening to spread the name and get even more markets opened I will still be surprised if we don't see some kind of online game in next 5 years or so.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #542

    @Dan54 obviously not all of them...but their first one (NZR+) hasn't been revolutionary/innovative or a success...so not a great start

    notice im not saying ditch them...but would be good to see what else it planned

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #543

    NZR+ (to the best of my knowledge) doesn’t play games - everything still goes through TV deals. If they set it up to be an online rugby site with all games then it will quickly get members. The question is of course whether it’s worth running it in all markets, but in my case I I pay about $30 a month to a service I only use for rugby. I’d happily pay that directly to NZR+ but I doubt there are enough customers like me.

    As a pay per game idea, it could have merit for people like my family who don’t have it but might pay $10-20 for a one match payment (eg, super final, AB games).

    All of that is to say that any rugby space without actual live (or even delayed games) is always likely to be a failure.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #544

    @gt12 I'd love to give NZR whatever I give to Stan if that meant I could chose whether or not to listen to the commentary.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #545

    @antipodean

    Unless they did something ‘hip’ like getting the NZR commentary by those fuckheads from the Alt cricket commentary.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #546

    Sky have removed the option of not having the commentary on their satellite broadcast.

    The ACC dickheads are available on a separate channel.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #547

    @Kiwiwomble said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

    @Winger my understanding of the deal was they had actions in growing the revenue too, it wasn't a straight equity injection (we give you some money and you give us some profit later), silverlake sold the idea of tapping into new revenue streams they had access too...and we havent seen any of that

    Always a big issue. The Neoclassical economics model is all about selling ownership for investment. It’s whether the investment is nothing more than finance you could have got from a bank. NZ’s state owned asset sales perfect example.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #548

    I'd drop Sky for NZR+ if they streamed games. I don't watch anything else on Sky.

    Canes4lifeC M 2 Replies Last reply
    5

Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.