Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?
-
@gt12 said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
@Rapido said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
NZRU 'buy' 1 quarter of a single year's worth of their own revenue, upfront. For the price of giving away 5.7% of their own revenue forever and ever.
I think that article states that it increased to 7.5% after the second round?
Yes. They increase it from 1.9% to 7.5% (which is an extra 5.7%) in return for $62.5m from Silverlake. And NZRU's revenue last year was about $240m.
Hence: "1 quarter of a single year's worth of their own revenue, upfront. For the price of giving away 5.7% of their own revenue forever and ever."
And if revenue even stays the same - They'll (we'll) have to fork out an extra $13.6m next year for the pleasure of that 60m this year. And then the following year do similar, and the next, and the next ...
-
@Rapido said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
@gt12 said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
@Rapido said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
NZRU 'buy' 1 quarter of a single year's worth of their own revenue, upfront. For the price of giving away 5.7% of their own revenue forever and ever.
I think that article states that it increased to 7.5% after the second round?
Yes. They increase it from 1.9% to 7.5% (which is an extra 5.7%) in return for $62.5m from Silverlake. And NZRU's revenue last year was about $240m.
Hence: "1 quarter of a single year's worth of their own revenue, upfront. For the price of giving away 5.7% of their own revenue forever and ever."
And if revenue even stays the same - They'll (we'll) have to fork out an extra $13.6m next year for the pleasure of that 60m this year. And then the following year do similar, and the next, and the next ...
OK, but I think it increased from 5.7% to 7.5%.
We were already in the hole for 5.7% before round two.
-
@gt12 said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
@Rapido said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
@gt12 said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
@Rapido said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
NZRU 'buy' 1 quarter of a single year's worth of their own revenue, upfront. For the price of giving away 5.7% of their own revenue forever and ever.
I think that article states that it increased to 7.5% after the second round?
Yes. They increase it from 1.9% to 7.5% (which is an extra 5.7%) in return for $62.5m from Silverlake. And NZRU's revenue last year was about $240m.
Hence: "1 quarter of a single year's worth of their own revenue, upfront. For the price of giving away 5.7% of their own revenue forever and ever."
And if revenue even stays the same - They'll (we'll) have to fork out an extra $13.6m next year for the pleasure of that 60m this year. And then the following year do similar, and the next, and the next ...
OK, but I think it increased from 5.7% to 7.5%.
We were already in the hole for 5.7% before round two.
Ah, .... crap (for me).
Slightly better, for NZRU.
So that means the more correct maths would be a 1/4 of a years revenue for 1.79%.
Using last years revenue number (and keeping it static) that would be buying that $62.5m for the price of $4.2m a year.
-
@Dan54
No the coach selection process was non existent, the successful SR coach side-lined for ages then NZR getting panicky that he might be going overseas and doing a deal. Then some last minute level headed assistant replacements giving us a good WC. Now we have a forever and ever equity loss that we are stuck with. -
@BerniesCorner said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
@Dan54
No the coach selection process was non existent, the successful SR coach side-lined for ages then NZR getting panicky that he might be going overseas and doing a deal. Then some last minute level headed assistant replacements giving us a good WC. Now we have a forever and ever equity loss that we are stuck with.Which selection process was non existent? Because we didn't agree with who they selected doesn't make it non existent. I may of missed one appointment where there wasn't a selection process, but it wasn't in my memory, perhaps you can enlighten me when one was just appointed without unless you talking about Hansen?
-
Inside NZR’s record TV deal and problems it will face securing a better one
NZ Rugby's next broadcast contract is critical to the game’s financial future.
Launched last year on the eve of the World Cup, NZR+ was hoping to win one million registrations by the end of the tournament.
By the week of the quarter-finals, it had just 60,000 and that was after spending an estimated $2m plus on content that featured Hollywood director Taika Waititi and various former All Blacks such as Dan Carter, Richie McCaw, Andy Ellis and George Bower.
This is the time for the US fund manager to shine – to deliver on the presentations it made in 2021 and play an influential role in helping NZR secure a much-improved broadcast contract.
Since Silver Lake came on board, it has produced no new or innovative ways to grow revenue and increasingly, those who supported bringing the US fund manager in as an equity partner, have told the Herald that they are beginning to think that significantly upping the value of the broadcast deal is the only trick in the investment house’s playbook.
But several sources have said that the difficulty of improving the current deal, can’t be underestimated.
To start, Silver Lake’s 7.5 per cent equity stake means that NZR needs to up the next deal to $108.1m just to have the equivalent amount of money.
NZR chief executive Mark Robinson has, however, said that audience numbers for the early rounds of Super Rugby Pacific are up about 25 per cent on last year and Sky has never hidden the fact that rugby continues to help it win and retain subscribers.
But without the fear of losing the rights, few analysts expect Sky will be willing to offer anywhere near the $100m it currently pays.
There is an assumption that Sky will be looking to reduce the price to around $80m-a-year, leaving Fenton having to find close to another $30m-a-year just to hold the current financial position.
As the Herald understands it, Fenton will target winning a major uplift in the price of the international rights to off-set any reduction in the home market.
It is thought that the current value of the international rights is only about US$10m – through deals with the UK and France which Sanzaar negotiated.
Nations Cup will be needed to increase revenue.
-
BTW:
In selling the Silver Lake transaction to its member unions, NZR said it would set up seven new business initiatives, one of which would be NZR+ and that it forecast it would make accumulated profits of $20.4m from this platform across its first four years.
Now this is the scenario:
The decision to effectively decommission NZR+ as the weight-bearing pillar of the content strategy is an indication that neither the audiences nor the associated data have yet been generated – which is just one of many issues that Fenton will be wrestling with when he begins renegotiating NZR’s broadcast contract in the next few months.
-
@Tim so it seem like they just though there was loads of people with money burning a hole in their pocket just looking for a way to spend it on AB content.....and didn;t think they needed to do much at all to actually raise interest in the AB's or NZ rugby at all
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
so it seem like they just though there was loads of people with money burning a hole in their pocket just looking for a way to spend it on AB content.....
NZR+ is a free platform
-
@Kiwiwomble I'm very sceptical of any talk of "international fans", as rugby is a hard game to understand, and very few people watch or play it overseas. Much different to different flavours of motor-sport or fighting sports.
-
@Tim especially if we're not doing anything different to "sell" the ABs...there are definitely out there that will just jump on a bandwagon (T swift and the chiefs)....but you have to do...something...to sell it to them...have we tried introducing Taylor to scooter?
-
Yet the NZRPA supported this deal didn't they. That's looking more and more like a total disaster
Maybe the NZR Board members responsible for it should all resign. As should anyone else who supported it. Although if it's as bad as it seems to be it's too late now. As its unlikely there is any way to get out of it
-
@Winger that would be dependant on what they were sold, if silver lake isn't doing what they said they would to grow things then THEY should be held to account
-
@Winger said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
Yet the NZRPA supported this deal didn't they.
They were very sceptical of it, and forced a review of the deal. That lead to a reduction of the revenue share sold to Silver Lake, which was sold at a much higher price.
I wouldn't blame the NZRPA for this deal. They wanted NZR to explore raising money locally instead.
-
@Kiwiwomble Holding a well-funded US private equity firm to "account". Not easy!
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
@Winger that would be dependant on what they were sold, if silver lake isn't doing what they said they would to grow things then THEY should be held to account
But so what? I doubt if there is a clause to cancel the agreement if SL doesn't perform. I kind of think NZR might have been taken for fools. Just on the little I have read on it. So, it could in fact be a wonderful deal.
-
@Tim very true....but at very least the poor semi amature PU board members shouldnt be punished if it was to be found silverlake had dropped the ball
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:
found silverlake had dropped the ball
Thye haven't though. From their viewpoint. It's a small up-front investment for guaranteed ongoing good returns it seems.
I just hope its not as terrible as it seems from NZR viewpoint. 7.5% is a lot of money to loss year after year
poor semi amature PU board members shouldn't be punished
Aren't 6 out of 9 appointed. So, they shouldn't be incompetent. But if proven to be just that they should go. Along with the 3 too. We don't want fools on the board of NZ rugby
