Chiefs v Hurricanes
-
@gt12 said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
, so the laws haven’t changed or anything
who knows...
Think the Chiefs attack looking sharper with Te Toiroa there
-
gotta say there is no way in hell Ardie was supporting his own weight there, by the same token, due to the pile up, he couldnt have gotten the ball without leaning all ove reveryone
-
-
-
@gt12 said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
Isn’t the law that players have to be clearly onside?
That was last week.
-
@No-Quarter said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@Nepia said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
Ridiculous that you can get a card (in this case red for a second yellow), when an attacking player takes the penalty so quickly that you don't have time to get back 10 metres.
That's the same as every quick tap though, it was just a combined unfortunate set of circumstances in this case.
It’s an interesting one. Refs rarely give penalty tries when offside players make tackles in that situation (I’ve always thought they should). Pretty big call from the ref, but I’d say technically correct.
Tough one for sure. Would McKenzie have definitely scored? I'm not sure. Certainly a yellow card though, and then the "unluckiness" of it being the same player comes in to make it a red rather than a yellow.
-
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
They've just taken the same space. Ridiculous asking for that to be a card.
Except the ref said it was a late tackle. So we can tackle with no arms now?
-
@voodoo he only needs to 'probably' score not definitely.
-
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@voodoo he only needs to 'probably' score not definitely.
Do you think he would have? He's pretty shit... 😉
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Hurricanes:
They've just taken the same space. Ridiculous asking for that to be a card.
Except the ref said it was a late tackle. So we can tackle with no arms now?
You're asking about O'Keefe's interpretation...
-
