• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiapK Offline
    KiapK Offline
    Kiap
    replied to pukunui on last edited by Kiap
    #1122

    @pukunui said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I was also under the impression that it was costing money because the Japanese union refused to back it properly.

    A long story where Sanzaar (how long has it left now?) screwed the pooch.

    Well, one of them did while the rest watched...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Online
    barbarianB Online
    barbarian
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #1123

    @pukunui said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    The Japan team will just hoover up fringe player from other countries too. Why would it be different from the first sunwolves? I was also under the impression that it was costing money because the Japanese union refused to back it properly. Might be wrong on that but regardless. Chasing expansion money and reducing quality is what caused the pre covid mess so it anyone thinking it is a solution now is nuts.

    My understanding is the inclusion of a Japanese team provides more TV revenue in Asian markets.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1124

    If the Sunwolves are to be included, there should be a minimum number of Japan eligible players required to be in their squad.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1125

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    If the Sunwolves are to be included, there should be a minimum number of Japan eligible players required to be in their squad.

    that's still a lot of Tongans

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1126

    @mariner4life

    I'd challenge them to have a few more, but without getting a company to put up the money, they'll struggle.

    Most of their wider training squad are JP born, so there are also some 'JP' looking faces who are there not not good enough yet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #1127

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=12363282

    Australian rugby's stark reality check - and what it means for New Zealand Rugby

    Liam Napier

    COMMENT:

    Rugby Australia faces a stark reality check.

    The dawn of a potentially negligible broadcast deal, which is expected to strip millions from RA's annual budget next year, has brought to an end the bold public statements of recent weeks.

    Claims of issuing New Zealand ultimatums and steadfastly maintaining faith in the sustainability of five Super Rugby franchises is set to be challenged as the realities of attempting to survive next year loom in the form of the fraught financial bottom line.

    Privately, Australian rugby knows drastic cutbacks across all levels of their game may be imminent.

    The tender process for RA's broadcast pitch, which centres on bidders cherry picking different competitions and test matches, closed last Friday and there has been little in the way of positive statements since.

    What we know for sure is offers will reach nowhere near the same $57m-a-year investment RA had been receiving.

    Former RA chief executive Raelene Castle last November knocked back a five-year offer from Fox Sports worth $35m annually in favour of pursuing deals with Optus and free-to-air providers.

    Since Castle's departure in late April, though, some projections now suggest Australia's domestic competition will earn $10m per-season.

    Noises outside the tent do not paint a rosy picture, either.

    Compared to rival codes, Foxtel boss Patrick Delany last week placed Australian rugby well down the pecking order, suggesting a low ball offer from his company at best. He mentioned AFL, NRL, cricket and motorsport as "tier-one sports" and said others were "going to have to adjust".

    "We are now quite fearless of losing a sport," Delany claimed.

    Broadcast revenue funds the game in every rugby nation. This is, therefore, where the rubber meets the road for Australia.

    Interim RA chief executive Rob Clarke had been bullish in public about the future of the domestic game but, behind closed doors, the realities of potentially cutting millions from the budget will be causing serious angst.

    Significantly less broadcast revenue will again test the notion of maintaining five teams and Clarke, a former chief executive of the Melbourne Rebels and Brumbies, may need to be removed from that touch point to avoid a potential conflict.

    The Western Force are clearly anxious about their future. Despite being welcomed back into Australia's domestic competition this season, the Perth-based team on Tuesday confirmed they are in talks with New Zealand Rugby about possible relocation next season.

    Australian rugby will almost certainly be in survival mode next year.

    Should RA opt to maintain its five teams, cuts elsewhere are inevitable. Leading players may be asked to further slash wages which could spark a mass exodus of top-tier talent, while the community game that builds the base is also likely to suffer.

    Castle pulled off a major coup in signing Dave Rennie as Wallabies coach and he will be desperate to retain as many of the next generation as possible. Rennie could soon, however, instead find many of his best assets basing themselves offshore.

    Surviving through to 2022, when a potential trans- Ta$man competition is considered more viable in an improved Covid-19 landscape, will be a big ask for Australia.

    New Zealand Rugby is sure to be watching Australia's broadcast developments with interest.

    NZR chief executive Mark Robinson has his own challenges to work through, having stated the preference for an eight-to-10 competition next year that will not eventuate.

    But with broadcast partner Sky secure for the next five years, and Super Rugby Aotearoa proving hugely successful, Robinson is in a much more stable position to plot longer term plans.

    NZR's polarising expression of interest process is understood to have received seven to nine formal applications – outside the five existing franchises. That includes the Bay of Plenty rugby union, Moana Pacific, Kanaloa Hawaii, the Asia Pacific Dragons among others.

    If collaboration can be achieved between some parties it is believed two bids could form credible entities beyond next year.

    By 2022, following another expected season of Super Rugby Aotearoa, New Zealand could have seven teams keen to join an expanded competition.

    How many Australian sides line up in a potential trans- Ta$man venture in 2022 is likely to be heavily influenced by their next broadcast deal.

    As much as New Zealand rugby needs Australia, it also needs them to hold their own on and off the pitch.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #1128

    @Tim interesting comment on the Force relocating. Where to?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #1129

    SA? i assume its been ignored for a reason though

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1130

    @booboo said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Tim interesting comment on the Force relocating. Where to?

    NZ. Relocating to NZ SR.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1131

    @Machpants I think @booboo means where in NZ. The Force would need a stadium to play in, and a city to be based in.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #1132

    are kiwis fans actually going to get behind and go and watch an "Australian" team if located to there area? can we expect a team to be successful without local support

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #1133

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    are kiwis fans actually going to get behind and go and watch an "Australian" team if located to there area? can we expect a team to be successful without local support

    no

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1134

    I've watched about 5 mins of SR AU on TV so that's where I'm at.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #1135

    @Bovidae said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I've watched about 5 mins of SR AU on TV so that's where I'm at.

    that's 5 mins more than me and i live here

    apparently they have finals this weekend?

    The Fox Sports news segment on sunday morning was pretty funny when they exclaimed the Rebels has made the Super Rugby finals for the first time in their history...

    KiwiwombleK D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1136

    Suncorp is allowing 50% capacity for the Reds-Rebels 2 vs 3 finals game this weekend, 26,500.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1137

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Bovidae said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I've watched about 5 mins of SR AU on TV so that's where I'm at.

    that's 5 mins more than me and i live here

    apparently they have finals this weekend?

    The Fox Sports news segment on sunday morning was pretty funny when they exclaimed the Rebels has made the Super Rugby finals for the first time in their history...

    same, no one in Melbourne knows who the rebels are so its hard to get excited...so just for get its on, compared to the hype they manage to create about a mid season mid table (nothing game) of AFL...its a bit embarrassing

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by antipodean
    #1138

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Bovidae said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I've watched about 5 mins of SR AU on TV so that's where I'm at.

    that's 5 mins more than me and i live here

    apparently they have finals this weekend?

    The Fox Sports news segment on sunday morning was pretty funny when they exclaimed the Rebels has made the Super Rugby finals for the first time in their history...

    same, no one in Melbourne knows who the rebels are so its hard to get excited...so just for get its on, compared to the hype they manage to create about a mid season mid table (nothing game) of AFL...its a bit embarrassing

    The establishment of rival code domestic teams in Melbourne is largely an ego issue. It matters not how successful they are, they simply can't gain any traction in the market.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #1139

    thats what i mean, the AFL manages to get people invested in games without the teams being successful, a lot of it is just tradition...but a lot is hype, they do alot of work off outside the game to keep people interested...rugby just seems to think existing is enough

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #1140

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    thats what i mean, the AFL manages to get people invested in games without success, a lot of it is just tradition...but a lot is hype, they do alot of work off outside the game to keep people interested...rugby just seems to think existing is enough

    And to make matters worse, the two major unions don't care about Melbourne. At all. They're uninterested in making a success of the game outside of their area.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1141

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    this is so bad

    a 12 team competition most people don't want, with overseas equity firms owning part of it?

    i cannot express how much i hate everything there

    Also i couldn't give even a single fuck about a world club comp. This is what test rugby is for.

    And a 16-team comp at that! You can just imagine the 8th Super team (likely an Australian team) getting absolutely pantsed by the 8th European team, which would really call into question the overall strength of Super Rugby in that format.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.