• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1105
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Snowy on last edited by Derpus
    #1106

    @Snowy clearly not. We could get there with proper management and investment though. Do NZ even have that at the moment?

    The O'neill wasn't me. Some cheeky mod i assume.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #1107

    This possible 12 team comp should be ultra competitive by the time the PI side has cannibalised the NZ SR sides and the Japanese side has picked up all the guys in the "unlucky not to get a SR contract in 2022 XV" thread.

    WONDERFUL.

    pukunuiP 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #1108

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    This possible 12 team comp should be ultra competitive by the time the PI side has cannibalised the NZ SR sides and the Japanese side has picked up all the guys in the "unlucky not to get a SR contract in 2022 XV" thread.

    WONDERFUL.

    Yep, just like the new force are the old force minus any players good enough to get contracts elsewhere. The Sunwolves MkII will be the old Sunwolves minus all the players who were good enough to get signed by someone else.

    Why the fuck do they think this is a good idea?

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1109

    @KiwiMurph said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    An argument could be made that the depth of the Aussie sides is a problem but the same argument could be made for the NZ teams to some degree

    Hardly comparing apples with apples are we?

    The hilarious aspect is @Derpus suggesting this competition structure should take a decades long view.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #1110

    @pukunui said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    This possible 12 team comp should be ultra competitive by the time the PI side has cannibalised the NZ SR sides and the Japanese side has picked up all the guys in the "unlucky not to get a SR contract in 2022 XV" thread.

    WONDERFUL.

    Why the fuck do they think this is a good idea?

    Money. It's pretty bloody obvious. The Force are a money pot, and so are the Sunwolves. What you lose on the field you make up in the coffers.

    In greener times we could afford to be purists about on-field quality but now we all broke as hell.

    pukunuiP 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by
    #1111

    I like this idea, But I would like to see more teams involved as a knockout type competition and then a finals series

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/122649110/club-world-cup-advances-as-european-rugby-bosses-find-accord

    Club World Cup 'advances' as European rugby bosses find accord

    Kiwi rugby fans have long wondered how the dominant Crusaders would go against the best clubs in Europe.
    Hannah Peters/Getty Images
    Kiwi rugby fans have long wondered how the dominant Crusaders would go against the best clubs in Europe.

    The chances of the champion Crusaders and other New Zealand teams taking on the north’s top clubs have increased with European rugby bosses “advancing” plans for a Club World Cup.

    European Professional Club Rugby chief executive Vincent Gaillard gave a positive outlook for the proposed tournament that would likely feature the eight quarterfinalists from Europe’s Champions Cup taking on the eight best teams from Super Rugby every four years.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #1112

    https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/cvc-silver-lake-australia-new-zealand-rugby-tournament-investment

    Report: CVC and Silver Lake circle touted trans- Ta$man rugby tournament

    Private equity firms CVC Capital and Silver Lake are set to lock horns for a share of a new trans- Ta$man rugby union competition, according to the Australian.
    Having initially been reluctant to include five Australian Super Rugby clubs in a new tournament model, New Zealand Rugby (NZR) is reportedly now ready to sign on for a 12-team competition, with Japanese and Pasifika sides also participating, which will kick off in 2022.

    Until then, Australia and New Zealand will reportedly continue with their domestic formats that have been used this year to minimise travel as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

    With plans for the trans- Ta$man competition now becoming clearer, both CVC and Silver Lake are reportedly eager to acquire a stake in the tournament as they continue their rugby expansion plans.

    CVC has already invested heavily in England’s top-flight Premiership Rugby and the Pro14 provincial competition, while it is also in talks to acquire a stake in the Six Nations national team tournament.ver Lake, meanwhile, was reported to have held talks with NZR earlier this year over a stake in the sport in the country. That deal would provide greater financial security for NZR, although it would not equate to the selling of the All Blacks national team, or the NZR Incorporated company itself.

    At the time, the New Zealand Herald reported that talks would resume with Silver Lake, and other interested parties, once NZR had a firm blueprint for a reimagined Super Rugby – which has now manifested as the trans- Ta$man competition.

    The report in the Australian added that Silver Lake has ‘made it clear it wants to thwart CVC’s grand plan’ to dominate the global rugby picture, which could prompt a bidding war.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #1113

    With that 12 team proposal.

    I'd have concerns that up to 4/12ths of the teams could be a fit fake.

    Melbourne, Perth, Sunwolves maybe depending on Japanese makeup, and a Singapore based Asia Pacific Dragons if that ends up the Pasifika franchise. From an authenticity POV.

    Plus, it's just a bit shit if the Australian talent pool is too diluted. From a quality POV.

    Who would be backing the Sunwolves, anyway? Why would they, if lucrative new Top League re-jig is happening anyway.

    KiapK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1114

    this is so bad

    a 12 team competition most people don't want, with overseas equity firms owning part of it?

    i cannot express how much i hate everything there

    Also i couldn't give even a single fuck about a world club comp. This is what test rugby is for.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1115

    I don't get the angst over the Pasifika team. Isn't that what NZ really wanted?

    Fuck the Sunwolves, though.

    mariner4lifeM RapidoR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1116

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I don't get the angst over the Pasifika team. Isn't that what NZ really wanted?

    Fuck the Sunwolves, though.

    No, not really. Because the players will mainly just come from existing Super teams. Everyone gets weaker. yay!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #1117

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    The O'neill wasn't me. Some cheeky mod i assume.

    Yes. He owns this circus (sorry @RL I don't like Carnies either). I think he was getting at you being a RA rep, albeit in the past.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Derpus on last edited by Rapido
    #1118

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I don't get the angst over the Pasifika team. Isn't that what NZ really wanted?

    I don't think it's something NZ have ever really wanted. it's something outsiders have wanted NZ (or SANZAR) to do.

    My angst.

    • if it is Singapore based it will be fake
    • if it is Auckland based it will split support on ethnic lines. Plus it would just dilute existing money and resources which would be better directed at a North Auckland team IMO. So a lot of disruption for no gain.

    If it is PI (Suva) based I'm fine with it. Even if it is the poorest team, and finishes near bottom each year. If it brings authenticity, passion, and ability to pull off upsets at home. It is worthy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiapK Offline
    KiapK Offline
    Kiap
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #1119

    @Rapido said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    a Singapore based Asia Pacific Dragons if that ends up the Pasifika franchise.

    Unlikely IMO. Singapore would be too much of a stretch for Carinet alone. APDs only appeared in the picture after NZR's desperation of recent months.

    Having said that , Kanaloa Hawaii are another level down again from there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #1120

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @pukunui said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    This possible 12 team comp should be ultra competitive by the time the PI side has cannibalised the NZ SR sides and the Japanese side has picked up all the guys in the "unlucky not to get a SR contract in 2022 XV" thread.

    WONDERFUL.

    Why the fuck do they think this is a good idea?

    Money. It's pretty bloody obvious. The Force are a money pot, and so are the Sunwolves. What you lose on the field you make up in the coffers.

    In greener times we could afford to be purists about on-field quality but now we all broke as hell.

    I was talking about the japanese/pacific teams rather than the force.
    I’m ok with a 10 team trans Ta$man comp, even if it’s not my first choice because I don’t think having weakened teams is going to be good for Aust rugby or the comp long term.

    The pacific team won’t be a money pot. It will drain resources and players and add fuck all other than a box tick.

    The Japan team will just hoover up fringe player from other countries too. Why would it be different from the first sunwolves? I was also under the impression that it was costing money because the Japanese union refused to back it properly. Might be wrong on that but regardless. Chasing expansion money and reducing quality is what caused the pre covid mess so it anyone thinking it is a solution now is nuts.

    KiapK barbarianB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1121

    human beings do not learn lessons

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiapK Offline
    KiapK Offline
    Kiap
    replied to pukunui on last edited by Kiap
    #1122

    @pukunui said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I was also under the impression that it was costing money because the Japanese union refused to back it properly.

    A long story where Sanzaar (how long has it left now?) screwed the pooch.

    Well, one of them did while the rest watched...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #1123

    @pukunui said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    The Japan team will just hoover up fringe player from other countries too. Why would it be different from the first sunwolves? I was also under the impression that it was costing money because the Japanese union refused to back it properly. Might be wrong on that but regardless. Chasing expansion money and reducing quality is what caused the pre covid mess so it anyone thinking it is a solution now is nuts.

    My understanding is the inclusion of a Japanese team provides more TV revenue in Asian markets.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1124

    If the Sunwolves are to be included, there should be a minimum number of Japan eligible players required to be in their squad.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.