Judiciary Happenings
-
that doesn't look like an official image, I'll wait for confirmation
-
@mariner4life said in Judiciary Happenings:
that doesn't look like an official image, I'll wait for confirmation
Fucking hell Skeen haven't you caused enough trouble?
-
@Machpants Yep, stupid. He could have asked for a different date & time for the disciplinary hearing, if the initial appointment didn't suit him because of his travel. The cited Uruguayan did that, too. His French club won't be happy.
-
@NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:
@mariner4life said in Judiciary Happenings:
that doesn't look like an official image, I'll wait for confirmation
Fucking hell Skeen haven't you caused enough trouble?
I'm just going to show you another angle
-
-
-
@NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:
@Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:
Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.
When we're bored, this happens...
Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...
There’s a politics thread?
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Judiciary Happenings:
@NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:
@Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:
Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.
When we're bored, this happens...
Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...
There’s a politics thread?
Subforum, maybe. You might have set it to "Ignore" as it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.
-
-
@Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:
@NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:
it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.
And some Polish chicks apparently.
Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?
Wait what? Do tell.
-
@Nepia Was in another thread about the demographics of this place. There were a surprising number of posts by women (or posters who identify as such) and Poland was also quite high in the ratings of places that people post from. So in good Fern fashion I put 2 and 2 together and got 81 - most people that post here are Polish chicks.
I'm actually Lena from Krakow which might explain it.
-
@Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:
@NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:
it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.
And some Polish chicks apparently.
Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?
Rugby isn't bullshit
-
-
@TeWaio Me as well, thought Barnes was a bit cheeky there. It deserved a TMO look, but I think he knew it could well be a red if it went to the TMO lottery. So went immediate yellow to avoid controversy.
To be fair there were a few aerial challenges in that game that would have been straight yellow in super rugby as well.
-
@mooshld that was as close to a red as a yellow can get imo. I think that's why Barnes jumped on the shoulder first contact and went yellow asap. I thought he handled other contact situations pretty well, compared to other refs that'd get card happy.
But soooo close to red, and who knows what might have happened!
-
@TeWaio said in Judiciary Happenings:
Can't wait for the Beast update on this thread....
Here's your update: no citing. The window (36 hours after conclusion of the match) has closed.
-
@Billy-Webb
But, but, but what are half the people on this site going to do if they can't argue with a citing despite virtually none of them ever actually having reffed and or read a law book??????????
