• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.3k Posts 89 Posters 104.9k Views
TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #974

    @booboo why?

    taniwharugbyT boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #975

    @Machpants pretty wide gate...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by Machpants
    #976

    Yeah but nothing out of the ordinary. According to the laws

    An arriving player must be on their feet and join from behind their offside line.

    A player may join alongside but not in front of the hindmost player.

    A player must bind onto a team-mate or an opposition player. The bind must precede or be simultaneous with contact with any other part of the body.

    That's it, the grinning giant was fine for me. Dozens of joins like that every game

    taniwharugbyT E boobooB 4 Replies Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Machpants on last edited by taniwharugby
    #977

    @Machpants agree to disagree (about him being ok, but agree it happens all the tIme and is pinged as much as not)

    Any how, irrelevant in the discussion of why we struggled in this game, is cos he was injured it is getting more attention.

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E African Troll Banned
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #978
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E African Troll Banned
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #979

    @Machpants

    Well summarised

    You saved me from having to explain this to Booboo

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by Machpants
    #980

    @taniwharugby yeah it's more that it happens all the time, so that must be the official interpretation. Or refs are just shyte and can't police it, just like the off side line, esp a few out from the ruck

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #981

    @Machpants said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    yeah Franks is only there for the scrum, nothing else. But he was wank there today, so he should be gone. with fijita on, our replacement props sturggled, but they were better than the starters until then

    Oddly Angus and Ofa looked good against starting Bok front row. But when shorter replacement Bok TH came on he managed to shear Ofa a couple of times, each time gaining penalties. IMO Ofa is NOT answer against best THs.

    MachpantsM K 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #982

    @pakman how much was losing BBBR in that? I can't remember exactly

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by No Quarter
    #983

    Right now Beauden is clearly our best 10 and 15.

    If we play him at 15, we have to start a rookie at 10.

    If we play him at 10, we start one of our most experienced players at 15.

    In a WC year you really have to go with the latter. I'm really disappointed in the way RM played, not for the first time he has been found wanting when his team is on the back foot. I'd hoped he would step up after another fine SR campaign but he was very poor. I think he's too much of a risk - we are going to be under the pump like that three games in a row at the RWC and we just can't afford our 10 to shit the bed.

    nzzpN E 2 Replies Last reply
    8
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #984

    @No-Quarter said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Right now Beauden is clearly our best 10 and 15.

    If we play him at 15, we have to start a rookie at 10.

    If we play him at 10, we start one of our most experienced players at 15.

    ... and our experienced 15 isc oming back from a leg injury. Fitness and pace will come back as he gets mroe training time.

    Also a comment for the Read/Cane/Savea combo. Great aroudn the park, but leaves us only three lineout options. Three is probably not enough against a top side, they'll read it too easily. Our defensive lineout steals have become a weapon over the last fwe years, and that by itself will take a step down if BBBR isn't there.

    No QuarterN Chester DrawsC boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E African Troll Banned
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #985

    @No-Quarter

    Tend to agree

    I'd start Mo'unga vs AUS in both games but no way he starts a RWC Knockout game at #10

    Mo'unga has a long way to go at #10 in Test Matches
    Saw him play last year vs Pumas in Nelson and Sanchez outplayed him comprehensively

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #986

    @nzzp said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @No-Quarter said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Right now Beauden is clearly our best 10 and 15.

    If we play him at 15, we have to start a rookie at 10.

    If we play him at 10, we start one of our most experienced players at 15.

    ... and our experienced 15 isc oming back from a leg injury. Fitness and pace will come back as he gets mroe training time.

    BFA started very slowly last year, I thought he was past it but he came good in a big way. At 15 his pace isn't so important, it's fielding kicks and making good decisions on attack and defense where he excels.

    We need Rieko to find his mojo again (I think he will) and a right winger. Who are the front runners there?
    Bridge (rookie at test level)
    Reece (rookie)
    Jordie (not great pace, erratic performer)

    Who am I missing? Shit we are thin there...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by
    #987

    @Jaguares4real what a silly comparison, Sanchez us vastly more experienced.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #988

    Big worry for me is Foster has no idea as an attack coach
    We are floundering getting much gain at the advantage line and I dont see what we are trying to achieve with the ball in hand at times.

    jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #989

    @Chris said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Big worry for me is Foster has no idea as a coach

    just a slight edit

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #990

    @jegga one step further would be to remove 'as a coach 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #991

    @taniwharugby said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Jaguares4real what a silly comparison, Sanchez us vastly more experienced.

    It's a valid comparison in the context of RM starting at 10 at the RWC. He will be up against vastly more experienced 10s, if he's not ready due to experience then he shouldn't start.

    taniwharugbyT E 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by taniwharugby
    #992

    @No-Quarter that was in his 2nd or 3rd AB game 10 months ago...

    I'm not quite ready to write anyone off after last night, too many big players were off, our game plan isn't working

    No QuarterN SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • 9 Offline
    9 Offline
    98blueandgold
    wrote on last edited by
    #993

    Interested in attack of our forwards. Compare stats from our forwards last night (ESPN) from 1-8 number of carries 2,5,1,4,7,6,7,10 = 42. The Irish whose forwards I think are the best at work rate against us last year were 7, 6,12, 3, 17, 22, 9, 9 = 85. Metres are pointless it’s involvements. Our starting FR had on 8 carries? So what threat are they? Defences can almost ignore them and focus elsewhere in effect narrowing or attack. Right across the pack an issue for us. Anyways 🤷‍♂️

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.