• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.3k Posts 89 Posters 104.9k Views
TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E African Troll Banned
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #143

    @antipodean said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Bones said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Geez I'm with @Stargazer people really do underestimate Todd. He's a quality performer.

    Yes he is, but he doesn't dominate in the way Cane and Ardie do.

    Todd is a much better player over the ball than Cane

    Cane is a jack of all trades and alot more robust physically

    To give a Wallabies example:

    Todd is Pocock - Good tackler who is great over the ball Average in attack

    Cane is like Hooper - Not as good over the ball but is versatile to his team

    P YeetyaahY mariner4lifeM 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #144

    @No-Quarter said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Tim said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    At least Aaron Smith isn't starting. Absolute dogshit against SA last year.

    Smith hasn't been terrible this year but TJP has taken his game to another level, he's the superior player now IMO.

    TJP less likely to be thrown off game by Bok phsicality.

    Would be chance to trial TJP/RM combo.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #145

    @Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Big Karl and Big Patty T. look like significant losers with this selection.

    Ofa and Angus as the bench props would be concerning for both Karl and Nepo Laulala, since it points a bit to one of those two missing the RWC cut - and since Karl hasn't been given a run, maybe it's him in the gun.

    Not picking a specialist lock on the bench and instead two two loosies would be pretty concerning for Tuipolotou, who's definitely 4th lock at best once Barrett is fit. I'm pretty surprised that they didn't choose Hemopo instead of Fifita, but this might be a pointer towards the pecking order in that regard as well. I think the AB selectors have mainly picked Fifita ahead of Hemopo?

    I can also be colored pretty surprised that Todd is starting and neither Cane nor Ardie is in the 23.

    Richie at 10, Beaudy at 15 is a very big call - it's exciting - but, hope neither of them gets injured! Not sure what the "significant" injury rate is for the starting XV in test rugby, but it must be more than one player per game.

    Big game for SBW I think - needs to show he's worth persisting with.

    Karl T is very clearly no. 2 LH at scrum time, so it's one of him/Moli. Ofa seems to have shown he can cover both sides, so think the real call is Laulala/Ta'Avao.

    My take is that if Franks is fully fit them Angus has good shot as more mobile option/impact selection. Any doubt about Franks and Nepo a lock for scrummaging.

    With Barrett (S) a fully fledged locking option, I think question is the role TWM are looking for. Fully blown power lock role suits Patty T, but if looking for 5 1/2 AND starter in gimme games he's going to struggle.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by pakman
    #146

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @antipodean said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Bones said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Geez I'm with @Stargazer people really do underestimate Todd. He's a quality performer.

    Yes he is, but he doesn't dominate in the way Cane and Ardie do.

    Todd is a much better player over the ball than Cane

    Cane is a jack of all trades and alot more robust physically

    To give a Wallabies example:

    Todd is Pocock - Good tackler who is great over the ball Average in attack

    Cane is like Hooper - Not as good over the ball but is versatile to his team

    Pocock is McCaw like in being more than just a 7, great at being in right place at right time, even if not for strictly 7 'duties'. Hooper excellent 7, but not as many 'involvements' per game.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #147

    Team confirmed. http://www.allblacks.com/News/34439/all-blacks-team-named-for-test-against-south-africa

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by pakman
    #148

    If RM and SBW click, with BB at 15 it could be a very long night for the Bokke.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by Bones
    #149

    @pakman said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @antipodean said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Bones said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Geez I'm with @Stargazer people really do underestimate Todd. He's a quality performer.

    Yes he is, but he doesn't dominate in the way Cane and Ardie do.

    Todd is a much better player over the ball than Cane

    Cane is a jack of all trades and alot more robust physically

    To give a Wallabies example:

    Todd is Pocock - Good tackler who is great over the ball Average in attack

    Cane is like Hooper - Not as good over the ball but is versatile to his team

    Pocock is McCaw like in being more than just a 7, great at being in right place at right time, even if not for strictly 7 'duties'. Hooper excellent 7, but not as many 'involvements' per game.

    alt text

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #150

    @Bones More McCaw like?!

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by pakman
    #151

    For me the most interesting selection is Fifita to cover lock/loose. If a lock goes down for me he's after Patty T and Hemopo, but perhaps ahead of Frizell. What he does bring is speed, which might be a weakness of Bokke loosies.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #152

    @pakman said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Bones More McCaw like?!

    I'd struggle to think of a 7 on the international scene that is less McCaw like. And for that matter, less one dimensional.

    SmutsS taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by
    #153

    @Jaguares4real Good God please never mention Hooper and Cane in the same sentence ever again.

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #154

    @Bones Pocock is a one trick pony, but its a bloody good trick.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #155

    @Bones yep, Pocock is a one trick pony, granted exceptional at his one trick, while McCaw had all the strings to his bow.

    You only need look at how much more balanced back rows function without Pocock in them to see he doesn't do enough of the other work.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #156

    @taniwharugby balanced they may be, but are they more woke?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #157

    So what are we calling this team? B-, B or B+?

    canefanC mofitzy_M Victor MeldrewV 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #158

    @Hooroo bizarro?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #159

    @Hooroo
    I want to see if the 9/10/15 combo clicks before making that call. Starting tight 5 looks close to our best though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #160

    Maybe we don't have them covered after all. Can't believe Cane and/or Savea aren't on the bench

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #161

    @Hooroo

    It does seems weird.

    Perhaps having Sam & Ardie, Hansen feels comfortable with either starting at 7 and wants to give Todd a run.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #162

    @Hooroo said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    So what are we calling this team? B-, B or B+?

    Proof that SBW is Hansen's love-child?

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    3

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.