• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.3k Posts 89 Posters 104.9k Views
TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by
    #1127

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel

    I agree it's trivial Moving the ball 1m forward in the 22 is immaterial

    It's just pointless and yet so blatant/careless by BB

    In an age of dozens of camera angles and everyone having Smartphones......

    Just reinforce narrative of ABs "bending" the rules

    It's a bit weird. Made the kick harder for himself by closing the angle. Is this the one he missed?

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to mofitzy_ on last edited by
    #1128

    @mofitzy_ said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Saffas love to play the one-eyed victim even at the best of times. If had been Brodie coming in the side clearing out Snyman we would have heard 10x the noise about it.

    I noticed neutrals tweeted that the ruck was a mess and the rules need to change so we don't have injuries like that in the RWC.

    I guarantee if the roles were reversed, and one of our boys knocked out one of theirs, Erasmus would not have been as philosophical as Shag

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E African Troll Banned
    replied to mofitzy_ on last edited by E African Troll
    #1129

    @mofitzy_

    Brodie was caught interfering in the ruck trying to slow down the ball

    Synman came in and smoked Brodie

    Sadly he got badly injured but Brodie had no business being in that ruck

    mofitzy_M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E African Troll Banned
    replied to Rapido on last edited by E African Troll
    #1130

    @Rapido

    Yes he missed the kick

    Essentially the same spot where Pollard missed his penalty in 2nd half

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by
    #1131

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel

    I agree it's trivial Moving the ball 1m forward in the 22 is immaterial

    It's just pointless and yet so blatant/careless by BB

    In an age of dozens of camera angles and everyone having Smartphones......

    Just reinforce narrative of ABs "bending" the rules

    Seriously who gives a shit? The way these idiots are carrying on you'd think he'd gone and placed the ball in front of the posts. Or poisoned the entire team.

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by
    #1132

    @Jaguares4real
    Plus he was wearing a short dress.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E African Troll Banned
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1133

    @Rancid-Schnitzel

    It's cheating albeit low level

    But why does BB feel to move the ball at all 🤔

    Bearing in mind it's his home ground Does it indicate a lack of confidence?
    He did after all miss the penalty

    RapidoR DuluthD Rancid SchnitzelR taniwharugbyT 4 Replies Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by
    #1134

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel

    It's cheating albeit low level

    But why does BB feel to move the ball at all 🤔

    Bearing in mind it's his home ground Does it indicate a lack of confidence?
    He did after all miss the penalty

    He should lack confidence in his goal kicking, seeing as he's shit at it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by Duluth
    #1135

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    But why does BB feel to move the ball at all

    I’m sure you aren’t silly enough to claim this is unique to the All Blacks. I’ve seen players from every nation try this crap.

    Why do they feel the need? Well ‘need’ is the wrong word. They do it because there’s a small gain and no real penalty.

    If you get away with it, you gain a yard or two. If you get caught, the ref laughs and moves the ball back to the correct mark.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by gt12
    #1136

    The re-watch: Is it now time to leave Fifita behind?

    In a gripping game that SA will feel unlucky about only drawing, a number of ABs showed the selectors why they shouldn’t be at the world cup. Some players appear past it, and some are just not good enough.

    What is happening with our starting front row?

    First, the starting front row performance was pretty woeful – with the possible exception of Taylor. Although it is their first AB game of the year, the invisibility of Owen Franks – except for his defensive lapses (including some comical misses) is a key issue. One hopes that it is form and both he and Moody have enough to turn it on in Japan. The stats show that Taylor had 6 metres, 1 bad throw, 9 tackles, and no misses. Moody gained 3 metres from 2 runs, including 1 terrible cold drop turnover. He did earn 1 turnover, and made 4 of his 5 tackles. Owen Franks had no stats on offence (according to Sanzar) – no carries, metres, or passes. However, on my rewatch, which I'll discus below, I did notice one carry at 42:27, where he gained about one metre. He made 5 tackles and had his customary 2 misses. I’m wondering why Ofa, Nepo, or Ta’avao can’t get a chance here – each can carry, clean, and tackle plus I wonder if there is so much difference in their scrummaging. Is this Cron focusing too much on the scrum?

    SBW

    Second, it’s probably time to recognize that SBW is not the key to breaking down the rush – in fact he can be targeted due to the way he carries. He had one magical pass (that to be fair most 12s should give), but that was it. Apart from that, our (starting) midfield was pretty up and down. It seemed that ALB was a little more dynamic when he came on, although the stats don’t really bear that out too much – probably because they don’t capture the metres gained from a couple of his passes. Anyway, by the numbers, SBW was penalized once, and turned over the ball twice, while making 7 tackles with no misses) and running for 16 metres off 10 carries. ALB had two runs with one defender beaten, 1 tackle with no misses, and had 3 passes, one of which found space.

    The continuing problem at Six

    Finally, six remains a key problem. It’s puzzling that they only gave Paps 4 minutes, but I think it’s because they wanted to see Frizell's contribution, and there was a bit of talk in the game thread about him being a bit anonymous, so after @Duluth suggested that he be the focus on today’s post, I looked at him and Fifita – always good for plenty of discussion – in my re-watch. First, the stats according to Sanzar:

    Frizell won 3 lineouts, ran for 16 metres, made 5 tackles with 1 miss, and wasn’t penalized, conceding no turnovers. His fellow starters were busy, Todd had 14 tackles with no misses, and ran for 17 metres (more than any forward not named Dane Coles [31]). At eight, Read made 8 tackles with no misses. Looking at those stats, Frizell certainly looks like the weak link, but as my re-watch will show, he’s actually doing a fair bit of suitcase work. Furthermore, I really like the way he chases play, even to make a clean. That point separates him from Fifita, who after coming on to replace Retallick also won 3 lineouts, but made zero tackles in nearly 19 minutes with one offload while running for 4-6 metres off 5 carries. It’s not exactly what we’d like from a supposedly amazing athlete, but I think he just isn’t physical or active enough at this level – he’d end up on the wing or be the guy standing behind the ruck, rather that the guy who chases the play and make a strong contribution.

    As you’ll see below, altogether I get about 40 odd ruck attendances for Frizell, at many of which he makes effective cleans.

    On the other hand, I have Fifita with about 9 during his 19 minutes, so it seems similar right? It’s not.

    Fifita is a ruck leaner – very seldom a ruck cleaner.

    I’m no AB selector (clearly), but if one six is to be dropped from Frizell, Fifita, and Hemopo, it should be Fifita.

    Frizell

    00:07: joins ruck
    00:20: pillar
    00:25: joins ruck after charge down
    00:57: first man to the ruck, attacks ball ineffectively

    SA get penalty and kick

    02:19 good shot on Vermeulen after kick off
    02:51 joins ruck from wrong side on defense (lucky to not be penalized)
    03:36 good clean on Vermeulen who is attacking the ball

    Lots of kicking

    06:00 ruck lean
    06:03 ruck clean
    08:19 attacks ball on the ground

    SBW penalized, they kick for goal

    10:06 attempts charge down
    11:10 line out win
    11:23 clean out on the other side of the field - we win penalty
    13:37 line out win
    18;01 non dominant tackle
    18:59 tackle
    19:26 missed tackle on Kwagga
    20:18 wins line out

    We turn it over and they go on attack

    25:20 attacks ruck as first man there - is cleaned out, but I like the way he followed the play across to get involved

    We get penalized and they miss

    29:20 joins ruck and secures ball (Todd turned it over)
    30:22 carries for 2 meters
    30:30 gets up and helps clean
    32:18 non dominant tackle and allows player to offload
    32:27 excellent clean to secure the ball
    34:23 stopping tackle in midfield
    35:20 first man to the ruck after Ioane drop - cleans SA player ineffectively

    Plays goes on and we score

    40:05 joins ruck from wrong side but gets away with it, we clear and that’s the half
    40:31 ruck lean
    40:55 good clean
    41:15 another clean
    41:40 follows play and cleans again
    42:02 effective clean
    42:08 gets up and cleans again
    42:31 ruck lean/clean
    43:13 tackle
    43:55 arrives at ruck to pass

    Disappears to the wing for a minute or two

    46:53 joins ruck
    47:11 ruck lean
    47:21 ruck lean
    49:20 attacks ball at their ruck
    49:30 strongish tackle on Etzebeth as he passes
    49:47 second tackler and attacks ball
    51:58 good clean
    52:13 catch pass in the tackle
    55:28 strong carry for 2-3 meters, gets us going forward (we win a penalty)
    56:26 lifts Read
    56:48 sort of tackle (guy is going down anyway)
    57:22 gets inside ball and makes 6-7 easy meters

    BBBR goes down Fifita comes on

    61:14 tackle
    61:41 ruck clean
    62:10 carries for 1-2 meters
    62:32 tackle
    63:37 run in space (10-12 meters) then passes to Bridge
    64:13 ruck clean
    64:27 catch/pass then big clean
    64:44 ruck lean/protect HB for box kick, cleans arriving player
    68:36 arrives at ruck to pass
    69:02 arrives to clean but is ineffective and can’t prevent turnover penalty
    71:48 cleans just in time
    71:55 ruck lean/HB protection
    72:09 overruns but comes back to clean
    72:24 cleans the ball carrier passes
    72:31 ruck lean

    We get penalty

    75:24 joins ruck, gets ball and gives it to HB
    75:37 comes over to next ruck and makes a needed clean, is clearly fucked and out of gas - Fifita stations himself on the wing
    76:04 cleans
    76:28 ruck lean/clean
    76:45 Goes off

    Fifita

    61:32 ruck lean
    61:56 ruck lean
    62:05 carries well for 3-4 meters
    62:35 ineffective not quite tackle on Kwagga
    62:39 ruck lean
    63:46 catch, carry, 1 meter
    64:06 ruck lean
    64:25 ruck lean
    64:46 another ruck lean coming as we get the penalty
    67:39 line out take
    68:25 catch/pass in the tackle
    68:46 carries for 1-2 meters
    71:53 ineffective join/clean
    72:15 carries hard and makes 4-5 as we attack their line
    72:31 ruck lean
    74:26 catches kick off and gets taken out, we get a penalty
    75:16 excellent lift on Read
    76:10 ruck lean that turns to a real clean
    78:11 attacks line out (that was not straight), joins maul
    78:54 is offside and lucky not to get called
    as Bridge comes charging in leaving the left flank completely exposed (Bridge does the same thing in the next passage and they take advantage) as Fifita comes across but not in time

    ChrisC P BovidaeB 3 Replies Last reply
    16
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by Chris
    #1137

    @Rancid-Schnitzel fuk me I haven’t got 3 weeks to write all the BS cheating we had to put up with in SA over the years drop goals that didn’t actually go between the posts etc
    What a pack of whining piston wristed gibbons
    I can’t wait for the rematch come WC time.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to gt12 on last edited by Chris
    #1138

    @gt12 Awesome work that mate
    I always thought FIfitia was ineffective and goes missing and that backs it up

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #1139

    @Chris said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel fuk me I haven’t got 3 weeks to write all the BS cheating we had to put up with in SA over the years drop goals that didn’t actually go between the posts etc
    What a pack of whining piston wristed gibbons
    I can’t wait for the rematch come WC time.

    It's Twitter and Twitter is an absolute sewer. Most Saffas who have been here have been great. Met plenty too. The worst ones will be the so-called neutrals who will be desperate to see us beaten.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by
    #1140

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel

    It's cheating albeit low level

    But why does BB feel to move the ball at all 🤔

    Bearing in mind it's his home ground Does it indicate a lack of confidence?
    He did after all miss the penalty

    He was probably unsure if he would make the distance. Or maybe there were other things going through that devious and diabolical mind. Seriously, who gives a sheet. It's like a kicker stealing a yard or two when kicking for touch.

    canefanC Billy WebbB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1141

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel

    It's cheating albeit low level

    But why does BB feel to move the ball at all 🤔

    Bearing in mind it's his home ground Does it indicate a lack of confidence?
    He did after all miss the penalty

    He was probably unsure if he would make the distance. Or maybe there were other things going through that devious and diabolical mind. Seriously, who gives a sheet. It's like a kicker stealing a yard or two when kicking for touch.

    It's a kicker's responsibility to grab a little more distance whenever possible isn't it? Same in any kicking ball code

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #1142

    @canefan said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel

    It's cheating albeit low level

    But why does BB feel to move the ball at all 🤔

    Bearing in mind it's his home ground Does it indicate a lack of confidence?
    He did after all miss the penalty

    He was probably unsure if he would make the distance. Or maybe there were other things going through that devious and diabolical mind. Seriously, who gives a sheet. It's like a kicker stealing a yard or two when kicking for touch.

    It's a kicker's responsibility to grab a little more distance whenever possible isn't it? Same in any kicking ball code

    In afl that would be considered clever

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #1143

    @kiwiinmelb said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @canefan said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel

    It's cheating albeit low level

    But why does BB feel to move the ball at all 🤔

    Bearing in mind it's his home ground Does it indicate a lack of confidence?
    He did after all miss the penalty

    He was probably unsure if he would make the distance. Or maybe there were other things going through that devious and diabolical mind. Seriously, who gives a sheet. It's like a kicker stealing a yard or two when kicking for touch.

    It's a kicker's responsibility to grab a little more distance whenever possible isn't it? Same in any kicking ball code

    In afl that would be considered clever

    Watch it happen with ever free kick and throw-in in football, most free kick or penalty kicks for touch in union and league

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #1144

    @gt12 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    The re-watch: Is it now time to leave Fifita behind?

    In a gripping game that SA will feel unlucky about only drawing, a number of ABs showed the selectors why they shouldn’t be at the world cup. Some players appear past it, and some are just not good enough.

    What is happening with our starting front row?

    First, the starting front row performance was pretty woeful – with the possible exception of Taylor. Although it is their first AB game of the year, the invisibility of Owen Franks – except for his defensive lapses (including some comical misses) is a key issue. One hopes that it is form and both he and Moody have enough to turn it on in Japan. The stats show that Taylor had 6 metres, 1 bad throw, 9 tackles, and no misses. Moody gained 3 metres from 2 runs, including 1 terrible cold drop turnover. He did earn 1 turnover, and made 4 of his 5 tackles. Owen Franks had no stats on offence (according to Sanzar) – no carries, metres, or passes. However, on my rewatch, which I'll discus below, I did notice one carry at 42:27, where he gained about one metre. He made 5 tackles and had his customary 2 misses. I’m wondering why Ofa, Nepo, or Ta’avao can’t get a chance here – each can carry, clean, and tackle plus I wonder if there is so much difference in their scrummaging. Is this Cron focusing too much on the scrum?

    SBW

    Second, it’s probably time to recognize that SBW is not the key to breaking down the rush – in fact he can be targeted due to the way he carries. He had one magical pass (that to be fair most 12s should give), but that was it. Apart from that, our (starting) midfield was pretty up and down. It seemed that ALB was a little more dynamic when he came on, although the stats don’t really bear that out too much – probably because they don’t capture the metres gained from a couple of his passes. Anyway, by the numbers, SBW was penalized once, and turned over the ball twice, while making 7 tackles with no misses) and running for 16 metres off 10 carries. ALB had two runs with one defender beaten, 1 tackle with no misses, and had 3 passes, one of which found space.

    The continuing problem at Six

    Finally, six remains a key problem. It’s puzzling that they only gave Paps 4 minutes, but I think it’s because they wanted to see Frizell's contribution, and there was a bit of talk in the game thread about him being a bit anonymous, so after @Duluth suggested that he be the focus on today’s post, I looked at him and Fifita – always good for plenty of discussion – in my re-watch. First, the stats according to Sanzar:

    Frizell won 3 lineouts, ran for 16 metres, made 5 tackles with 1 miss, and wasn’t penalized, conceding no turnovers. His fellow starters were busy, Todd had 14 tackles with no misses, and ran for 17 metres (more than any forward not named Dane Coles [31]). At eight, Read made 8 tackles with no misses. Looking at those stats, Frizell certainly looks like the weak link, but as my re-watch will show, he’s actually doing a fair bit of suitcase work. Furthermore, I really like the way he chases play, even to make a clean. That point separates him from Fifita, who after coming on to replace Retallick also won 3 lineouts, but made zero tackles in nearly 19 minutes with one offload while running for 4-6 metres off 5 carries. It’s not exactly what we’d like from a supposedly amazing athlete, but I think he just isn’t physical or active enough at this level – he’d end up on the wing or be the guy standing behind the ruck, rather that the guy who chases the play and make a strong contribution.

    As you’ll see below, altogether I get about 40 odd ruck attendances for Frizell, at many of which he makes effective cleans.

    On the other hand, I have Fifita with about 9 during his 19 minutes, so it seems similar right? It’s not.

    Fifita is a ruck leaner – very seldom a ruck cleaner.

    I’m no AB selector (clearly), but if one six is to be dropped from Frizell, Fifita, and Hemopo, it should be Fifita.

    Frizell

    00:07: joins ruck
    00:20: pillar
    00:25: joins ruck after charge down
    00:57: first man to the ruck, attacks ball ineffectively

    SA get penalty and kick

    02:19 good shot on Vermeulen after kick off
    02:51 joins ruck from wrong side on defense (lucky to not be penalized)
    03:36 good clean on Vermeulen who is attacking the ball

    Lots of kicking

    06:00 ruck lean
    06:03 ruck clean
    08:19 attacks ball on the ground

    SBW penalized, they kick for goal

    10:06 attempts charge down
    11:10 line out win
    11:23 clean out on the other side of the field - we win penalty
    13:37 line out win
    18;01 non dominant tackle
    18:59 tackle
    19:26 missed tackle on Kwagga
    20:18 wins line out

    We turn it over and they go on attack

    25:20 attacks ruck as first man there - is cleaned out, but I like the way he followed the play across to get involved

    We get penalized and they miss

    29:20 joins ruck and secures ball (Todd turned it over)
    30:22 carries for 2 meters
    30:30 gets up and helps clean
    32:18 non dominant tackle and allows player to offload
    32:27 excellent clean to secure the ball
    34:23 stopping tackle in midfield
    35:20 first man to the ruck after Ioane drop - cleans SA player ineffectively

    Plays goes on and we score

    40:05 joins ruck from wrong side but gets away with it, we clear and that’s the half
    40:31 ruck lean
    40:55 good clean
    41:15 another clean
    41:40 follows play and cleans again
    42:02 effective clean
    42:08 gets up and cleans again
    42:31 ruck lean/clean
    43:13 tackle
    43:55 arrives at ruck to pass

    Disappears to the wing for a minute or two

    46:53 joins ruck
    47:11 ruck lean
    47:21 ruck lean
    49:20 attacks ball at their ruck
    49:30 strongish tackle on Etzebeth as he passes
    49:47 second tackler and attacks ball
    51:58 good clean
    52:13 catch pass in the tackle
    55:28 strong carry for 2-3 meters, gets us going forward (we win a penalty)
    56:26 lifts Read
    56:48 sort of tackle (guy is going down anyway)
    57:22 gets inside ball and makes 6-7 easy meters

    BBBR goes down Fifita comes on

    61:14 tackle
    61:41 ruck clean
    62:10 carries for 1-2 meters
    62:32 tackle
    63:37 run in space (10-12 meters) then passes to Bridge
    64:13 ruck clean
    64:27 catch/pass then big clean
    64:44 ruck lean/protect HB for box kick, cleans arriving player
    68:36 arrives at ruck to pass
    69:02 arrives to clean but is ineffective and can’t prevent turnover penalty
    71:48 cleans just in time
    71:55 ruck lean/HB protection
    72:09 overruns but comes back to clean
    72:24 cleans the ball carrier passes
    72:31 ruck lean

    We get penalty

    75:24 joins ruck, gets ball and gives it to HB
    75:37 comes over to next ruck and makes a needed clean, is clearly fucked and out of gas - Fifita stations himself on the wing
    76:04 cleans
    76:28 ruck lean/clean
    76:45 Goes off

    Fifita

    61:32 ruck lean
    61:56 ruck lean
    62:05 carries well for 3-4 meters
    62:35 ineffective not quite tackle on Kwagga
    62:39 ruck lean
    63:46 catch, carry, 1 meter
    64:06 ruck lean
    64:25 ruck lean
    64:46 another ruck lean coming as we get the penalty
    67:39 line out take
    68:25 catch/pass in the tackle
    68:46 carries for 1-2 meters
    71:53 ineffective join/clean
    72:15 carries hard and makes 4-5 as we attack their line
    72:31 ruck lean
    74:26 catches kick off and gets taken out, we get a penalty
    75:16 excellent lift on Read
    76:10 ruck lean that turns to a real clean
    78:11 attacks line out (that was not straight), joins maul
    78:54 is offside and lucky not to get called
    as Bridge comes charging in leaving the left flank completely exposed (Bridge does the same thing in the next passage and they take advantage) as Fifita comes across but not in time

    Which would explain why Shag seemed satisfied with Frizell.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1145

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Chris said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rancid-Schnitzel fuk me I haven’t got 3 weeks to write all the BS cheating we had to put up with in SA over the years drop goals that didn’t actually go between the posts etc
    What a pack of whining piston wristed gibbons
    I can’t wait for the rematch come WC time.

    It's Twitter and Twitter is an absolute sewer. Most Saffas who have been here have been great. Met plenty too. The worst ones will be the so-called neutrals who will be desperate to see us beaten.

    I saw a stat that relates to Twitter usage in the States but I’m sure it relates to all countries: 22% of adults are on Twitter. Further to that, 80% of tweets are from 10% of its users. So if you use Twitter as a source of information for anything, you are getting around 2.2% of the general populations opinions, most who are putting out clickbait for likes/retweets.

    The moral of the story being Twitter doesn’t mean a God damn thing in the real world. Fake outrage galore.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to E African Troll on last edited by
    #1146

    @Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @canefan

    What are they guilty of beyond having a reckless disregard for opponents at rucks?

    But Saffas do love a good moan at Refs.....

    Most sensible thing you've ever posted

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.