• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
156 Posts 38 Posters 6.9k Views
CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #120

    I am sure the coaches won't learn, but after the match we should

    1. Give the next 2 starts to Nicholls, Munro is a failure
    2. If we play Henry he needs to be bowled through. The guy is not a death bowler
    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #121

    @canefan said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    I am sure the coaches won't learn, but after the match we should

    1. Give the next 2 starts to Nicholls, Munro is a failure
    2. If we play Henry he needs to be bowled through. The guy is not a death bowler

    Logic dictates Henry is due a few wickets but agree. We have other superior death options. No, Southee is not one of these anymore.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by rotated
    #122

    @MajorRage said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    Seem a bit annoyed about MOTM ... let’s mske it easy. Kane’s innings difference between winning and losing badly. Braithwait between almost winning and losing badly.

    Despite his great knock Kane handed in a team sheet with Munro and Milne on it.

    Give it to Brathwaite.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #123

    That Ferguson chap is really ruining your "stoic, proud, yet humble Kiwi" vibe with some of his wicket celebrations.

    And that dirty mo.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    I just don't know why the selectors went back to Munro when Nicholls seemingly won the spot at the end of our summer.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #125

    @MN5 said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    @canefan said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    I am sure the coaches won't learn, but after the match we should

    1. Give the next 2 starts to Nicholls, Munro is a failure
    2. If we play Henry he needs to be bowled through. The guy is not a death bowler

    Logic dictates Henry is due a few wickets but agree. We have other superior death options. No, Southee is not one of these anymore.

    He can still take wickets at the start. Neesh did a good job, I reckon CDG could do a job too. Henry? No

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #126

    @hydro11 Hesson said Nicholls hide injury niggles at the first game, so not fully fit, side I think. Then Guppy and Munro performed. Crickets not good at changing winning combinations

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to NTA on last edited by Siam
    #127

    @NTA said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    That Ferguson chap is really ruining your "stoic, proud, yet humble Kiwi" vibe with some of his wicket celebrations.

    And that dirty mo.

    Hypocrites proudly stand over here behind me!

    I'm making inquiries for wee locky to be my godson - love that lad 😁

    (warner mumble mumble, self awareness mumble mumble does he have to mumble...)

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #128

    Just got home from the game after not being online. Interesting to read the thread start to finish and just so many premature calls made ....

    Looks like NZ are half an excellent side and half a poor one. It's basically Tauranga keeping things together. What a maestro Kane is as usual walking to the wicket after just one ball.

    Great atmosphere at the game. English fans supporting the Windies and NZ fans mostly in their early 20s and mostly pissed.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #129

    @rotated said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    @MajorRage said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    Seem a bit annoyed about MOTM ... let’s mske it easy. Kane’s innings difference between winning and losing badly. Braithwait between almost winning and losing badly.

    Despite his great knock Kane handed in a team sheet with Munro and Milne on it.

    Give it to Brathwaite.

    Que?

    Re MOTM Brathwaite made it entertaining but he fucked up at the end.

    6 needed of 7 balls. Take the single. 5 off the over ... or take on the best outfield catcher in the opposition...

    Loses MOTM for losing the unlosable

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #130

    Just watched the little highlights package, and that over from Henry was truly shit bowling. It wasn't just that Brathwaite was totally in the zone. He was being served up dire, DIRE deliveries. Wide full tosses. He is not a death bowler. Bowl him out.

    Also, we need to fix our opening partnership woes. Yes, Kane is one of the best ever, but he shouldn't have to do everything runs-wise every bloody game because those around him do stupid shit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #131

    Ok.

    Have run the numbers.

    We're not guaranteed a semi yet.

    Some very plausible outcomes can see us missing out.

    Not going to run through them all but ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    wrote on last edited by Baron Silas Greenback
    #132

    Henrys pie chucking doesnt prove my point. It just illustrates it. Southee has bowled overs like that before, Boult has as well. A bad performance doesnt mean you are bad.
    However......if you are batting 9/10/11 and being picked as a bowler.. your captain needs to be able to throw you the ball at ANY stage of an innings and know you have a good chance of advancing the teams cause. Not 100%, but maybe 40% of really improving it, 55% chance of just maintaining the status quo and 5% of hurting your team.
    Henry fails at that miserably, after the first 15 overs he has a much higher chance of hurting your team than helping them.
    If you were captain of the Black Caps and it was a close game... how confident do you feel calling up Henry to bowl after the 15 over mark? He has no variations and is mentally fragile. He is a fair weather bowler and when the going gets tough, he seems to lose it more often than not.

    I know some facile supporters just screech STATS!!!.. but that analysis is cringey.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Bronze
    wrote on last edited by
    #133

    If anyone needs to be dropped it's Latham. Averaging 8 with the bat and we saw some suspect keeping against South Africa. Surely Blundell can't do worse?

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Bronze on last edited by
    #134

    @Bronze with us all but assured a SF place I would like to see Nicholls, Blundell and Sodhi given a run. We might need them if we are going to have a winning chance

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by MN5
    #135

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    Henrys pie chucking doesnt prove my point. It just illustrates it. Southee has bowled overs like that before, Boult has as well. A bad performance doesnt mean you are bad.
    However......if you are batting 9/10/11 and being picked as a bowler.. your captain needs to be able to throw you the ball at ANY stage of an innings and know you have a good chance of advancing the teams cause. Not 100%, but maybe 40% of really improving it, 55% chance of just maintaining the status quo and 5% of hurting your team.
    Henry fails at that miserably, after the first 15 overs he has a much higher chance of hurting your team than helping them.
    If you were captain of the Black Caps and it was a close game... how confident do you feel calling up Henry to bowl after the 15 over mark? He has no variations and is mentally fragile. He is a fair weather bowler and when the going gets tough, he seems to lose it more often than not.

    I know some facile supporters just screech STATS!!!.. but that analysis is cringey.

    Despite our differences on the subject I don’t actually disagree with any of this as such it’s just I think we need to realise we’re a team with weaknesses like any other and an ageing out of form Southee isn’t the answer to back up Boult. His stats ( sorry but I have to mention it ) have been awful since the 2015 WC.

    Henry’s death bowling was terrible. I’m certainly not gonna deny that in the slightest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #136

    Henry gets dropped for that farking catching chance off Gayle!!

    Easy peezy

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #137

    Wow what an insane game, WI have so many dangerous players so really good to get the win against them.

    Hard not to feel for Braithwaite. Just needed another yard on that final shot and he's a hero. Awesome innings and deserved to get his side over the line.

    Big positive for us is the way Kane and Rosco took control after the early wickets. We have our two all time best both in good form heading into the back end of the tournament.

    Boult in the wickets was also exactly what we needed. Henry getting smacked at the death once again not so much.

    Pakistan, Australia and then England to go. Bring it on!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #138

    @Cyclops said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    @hydro11 said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    @akan004 said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    Will these bowlers ever learn the value of yorkers?

    That was Henry's problem. He doesn't have the variations to be effective at the death. Neesham is a better bowler at this stage as we are seeing. Henry was trying to execute but they just turned out as full tosses.

    Yeah Neesham and Ferguson both bowled a lot of cutters and slower bouncers at the death. Henry's approach to bowling at the death seems completely different and hasn't really changed. What are the coaches doing?

    Kane bowled out Boult and Ferguson early in the search for wickets.

    CyclopsC canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #139

    @shark said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    @Cyclops said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    @hydro11 said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    @akan004 said in CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies:

    Will these bowlers ever learn the value of yorkers?

    That was Henry's problem. He doesn't have the variations to be effective at the death. Neesham is a better bowler at this stage as we are seeing. Henry was trying to execute but they just turned out as full tosses.

    Yeah Neesham and Ferguson both bowled a lot of cutters and slower bouncers at the death. Henry's approach to bowling at the death seems completely different and hasn't really changed. What are the coaches doing?

    Kane bowled out Boult and Ferguson early in the search for wickets.

    Boult and Ferguson bowled 44 through 47. Henry had 48 and Neesham 49. The difference in planning between Henry is 48 and Ferguson in 47 and Neesham in 49 stood out to me. Henry was consistently going far wide yorkers and missing, Neesham and Ferguson weren't.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

CWC Game #6 Black Caps v West Indies
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.