Stormers v Crusaders
-
@Chris-B said in Stormers v Crusaders:
Here's the interview from one of the South African complainants.
Much ado about nothing. By your own admission you were dressed funny, someone noticed (which is what you're after), laughed and rightly told you to fuck off when you kept insisting that he delete the photo/ video. The law allows for a photographer to take pictures of anyone in any public space. Whiny flufflybunny.
-
It's bad enough the team are named after the Mediaeval equivalent of the SS. Now it's revealed their players are shocking homophobes and treat women like Harvey Weinstein.
I wonder how many murders, rapes and other serious crimes occurred in SA the same night that a few people allegedly said some nasty words to each other.
-
@Chris-B said in Stormers v Crusaders:
Here's the interview from one of the South African complainants.
Uhm, that's what I already discussed & included in my previous post.
-
@Stargazer So it is - the perils of large blocks of text.
Even worse, I listened to your Mansbridge interview and heard about the other interview - and was going to ask you if you knew where to find it. But, I decided I could find it myself...
-
@taniwharugby yeah, seems like he's opened the door once he admitted/lied about not remembering anything.
-
-
@MN5 said in Stormers v Crusaders:
He's experienced this "day after day after day"
All the complaining he must do as a result leaves him very little opportunity to dress up and be fabulous. He must have great time management skills.
It's pure narcissism. He gets a dopamine hit from all of the likes, retweets and comments of support every time he pretends to be a victim.
-
@No-Quarter said in Stormers v Crusaders:
@MN5 said in Stormers v Crusaders:
He's experienced this "day after day after day"
All the complaining he must do as a result leaves him very little opportunity to dress up and be fabulous. He must have great time management skills.
It's pure narcissism. He gets a dopamine hit from all of the likes, retweets and comments of support every time he pretends to be a victim.
Eaxactly. As @Rancid-Schnitzel alluded to in his post SA is a country absolutely rife with genuinely horrific crime and hardship. I'm fucked off this wankstain is been given a platform to air his pathetic grievances but we do live in the age we do for better or worse.
-
@No-Quarter that has supposedly been proven that many use social media and seek the likes to give them a hit of natural highs
Am sure you all have friends and/or family members that posts a pic of themselves saying they look blah, waiting for everyoen to go you are stunning hun, you are so beautiful
-
@taniwharugby said in Stormers v Crusaders:
@No-Quarter that has supposedly been proven that many use social media and seek the likes to give them a hit of natural highs
Am sure you all have friends and/or family members that posts a pic of themselves saying they look blah, waiting for everyoen to go you are stunning hun, you are so beautiful
-
Great Bonkers is a cheat we knew that doesn't help the points table does it Sanzar
[link text](link url)https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/112941294/super-rugby-sanzaar-confirm-tmo-marius-jonker-was-wrong-to-deny-crusaders-try-in-cape-town
-
-
@Snowy said in Stormers v Crusaders:
I always used to call him Bonkers Jonkers because some of the rulings he made on the field were so weird. Then they give him a position that makes bad decision making even more obvious.
Or maybe he really is a cheat / corrupt? Not for me to SAy.
There is not enough bandwidth to list the history of SA referee injustices against the Crusaders.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Stormers v Crusaders:
@Snowy said in Stormers v Crusaders:
I always used to call him Bonkers Jonkers because some of the rulings he made on the field were so weird. Then they give him a position that makes bad decision making even more obvious.
Or maybe he really is a cheat / corrupt? Not for me to SAy.
There is not enough bandwidth to list the history of SA referee injustices against the Crusaders.
-
@Snowy said in Stormers v Crusaders:
I always used to call him Bonkers Jonkers because some of the rulings he made on the field were so weird. Then they give him a position that makes bad decision making even more obvious.
Or maybe he really is a cheat / corrupt? Not for me to SAy.
Ouch. That's harsh Snowy
Given where the pass took place, the ball clearly traveled forward a good few yards so one can understand the inclination to want to call it as forward.
But one would expect a TMO to know the laws of the game well enough to know that it is actually about whether the ball leaves the passing player "backwards out of the hand". So yes, disappointing and frustrating that Jonkers got it wrong.
I am pleased that SANZAAR seems to be adopting the habit of calling out incorrect TMO rulings. A ref has to make up his mind in an instant. A TMO though has the benefit of replays, multiple angels etc and it irks me when they get it wrong - in law. -
So does NZR influence over refs extend to SA police, maccas and bar owners to deny CCTV footage?
I saw a post on Tweeter claiming it is taking so long because they do not want to prejudice the criminal charges that are coming (assume that must apply to both separate allegations)
