• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
263 Posts 44 Posters 11.5k Views
Crusaders v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ToddyT Online
    ToddyT Online
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #229

    Sounds like Hammett may need to come in and clear out some of the senior players.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    14
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #230

    @Hooroo No! Really? Shocking.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #231

    @Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Sounds like Hammett may need to come in and clear out some of the senior players.

    Absolutely primed for a Hammett intervention.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #232

    @ACT-Crusader said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Sounds like Hammett may need to come in and clear out some of the senior players.

    Absolutely primed for a Hammett intervention.

    Even better, we might lure Scott Robertson home with the promise of Chiefs games at Blake Park and a post match surf at Clyde Street.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #233

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #234

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    Don't forget the 'culture change'

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #235

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    Don't forget the 'culture change'

    Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #236

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    Don't forget the 'culture change'

    Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.

    They still have BBBR, DMac, ALB and Cane in the team, moving them to other franchises is a job for Hammett.

    BonesB No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #237

    @Nepia touché.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #238

    @Nepia said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    Don't forget the 'culture change'

    Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.

    They still have BBBR, DMac, ALB and Cane in the team, moving them to other franchises is a job for Hammett.

    Think we need to start a Hammett for Chiefs campaign.

    BBBR and Cane can bolster the Canes pack (it's a natural fit for Cane in particular).

    DMac can head north to try and fill the hole Spencer left at 10.

    ALB could make a go of things at the Highlanders, try and get a few more "names" instead of "no-names" on their roster.

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ToddyT Online
    ToddyT Online
    Toddy
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #239

    @No-Quarter it will be an awesome contest between the two giants Blackwell and BBBR for starting spot at the Canes. The Wellingtonian will probably have the edge.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #240

    @Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter it will be an awesome contest between the two giants Blackwell and BBBR for starting spot at the Canes. The Wellingtonian will probably have the edge.

    TBF, a Magpies lock is going to struggle to even get a contract at the Canes, BBBR to the Highlanders I guess.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #241

    If you Chiefs boys want Hammer you'd better get a move on - before the ABs get their hands on him! 🙂

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #242

    @Chris-B said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    If you Chiefs boys want Hammer you'd better get a move on - before the ABs get their hands on him! 🙂

    Your jokes aren’t funny! 😡

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #243

    @Nepia said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Chris-B said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    If you Chiefs boys want Hammer you'd better get a move on - before the ABs get their hands on him! 🙂

    Your jokes aren’t funny! 😡

    Agree he took it too far with that one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #244

    @No-Quarter said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    1. ALB
    2. Goodhue

    The thought gives me warm feels

    Fucking this. With the bulldozer from Wellington on the bench. Loving our midfield options right now.

    ALB 12 / Goodhue 13 has been my favoured combination since the test last year that ALB played or came on at 12 in and looked a million bucks. Their combination of skills gives me a chubby.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #245

    @cgrant said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Havili could be useful on the bench since he covers several positions. The Crusaders are blessed with good players, this is a kind of problem the other franchises would probably like to be embarrassed with.

    Wasn’t the case a couple of years ago when Nadolo and McNicholl left and we signed Ioane, but since then the academy and has done its job via a combination of retention and recruitment with the emergence of Bridge, Ennor and Jordan plus they’ve persevered with Mataele and now we’re flush when you add in Havili’i and Dagg. We haven’t even seen Leicester F yet, plus there’s also Ngani Punivai in the wings (ahem).

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #246

    And a good recruit in Reece.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #247

    @shark said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    1. ALB
    2. Goodhue

    The thought gives me warm feels

    Fucking this. With the bulldozer from Wellington on the bench. Loving our midfield options right now.

    ALB 12 / Goodhue 13 has been my favoured combination since the test last year that ALB played or came on at 12 in and looked a million bucks. Their combination of skills gives me a chubby.

    I think yuo win. I was super keen for SBW/Goodhue, but SBWalt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #248

    Also, how about this for an internally focussed headline. @Derm-McCrum you'd be delighted:
    O'Gara's Crusaders attack runs riot in nine-try Chiefs hammering

    AFP  /  Mar 9, 2019

    O'Gara's Crusaders attack runs riot in nine-try Chiefs hammering

    O'Gara's Crusaders attack runs riot in nine-try Chiefs hammering

    There is no stopping the Super Rugby champions as they extended their winning run to 19 matches.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.