Crusaders v Chiefs
-
-
-
@canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.
Don't forget the 'culture change'
Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.
-
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.
Don't forget the 'culture change'
Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.
They still have BBBR, DMac, ALB and Cane in the team, moving them to other franchises is a job for Hammett.
-
@Nepia said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.
Don't forget the 'culture change'
Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.
They still have BBBR, DMac, ALB and Cane in the team, moving them to other franchises is a job for Hammett.
Think we need to start a Hammett for Chiefs campaign.
BBBR and Cane can bolster the Canes pack (it's a natural fit for Cane in particular).
DMac can head north to try and fill the hole Spencer left at 10.
ALB could make a go of things at the Highlanders, try and get a few more "names" instead of "no-names" on their roster.
-
@No-Quarter it will be an awesome contest between the two giants Blackwell and BBBR for starting spot at the Canes. The Wellingtonian will probably have the edge.
-
@Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@No-Quarter it will be an awesome contest between the two giants Blackwell and BBBR for starting spot at the Canes. The Wellingtonian will probably have the edge.
TBF, a Magpies lock is going to struggle to even get a contract at the Canes, BBBR to the Highlanders I guess.
-
-
-
@Nepia said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Chris-B said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
If you Chiefs boys want Hammer you'd better get a move on - before the ABs get their hands on him!
Your jokes aren’t funny!
Agree he took it too far with that one.
-
@No-Quarter said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
- ALB
- Goodhue
The thought gives me warm feels
Fucking this. With the bulldozer from Wellington on the bench. Loving our midfield options right now.
ALB 12 / Goodhue 13 has been my favoured combination since the test last year that ALB played or came on at 12 in and looked a million bucks. Their combination of skills gives me a chubby.
-
@cgrant said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Havili could be useful on the bench since he covers several positions. The Crusaders are blessed with good players, this is a kind of problem the other franchises would probably like to be embarrassed with.
Wasn’t the case a couple of years ago when Nadolo and McNicholl left and we signed Ioane, but since then the academy and has done its job via a combination of retention and recruitment with the emergence of Bridge, Ennor and Jordan plus they’ve persevered with Mataele and now we’re flush when you add in Havili’i and Dagg. We haven’t even seen Leicester F yet, plus there’s also Ngani Punivai in the wings (ahem).
-
@shark said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@No-Quarter said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
- ALB
- Goodhue
The thought gives me warm feels
Fucking this. With the bulldozer from Wellington on the bench. Loving our midfield options right now.
ALB 12 / Goodhue 13 has been my favoured combination since the test last year that ALB played or came on at 12 in and looked a million bucks. Their combination of skills gives me a chubby.
I think yuo win. I was super keen for SBW/Goodhue, but SBW
-
Also, how about this for an internally focussed headline. @Derm-McCrum you'd be delighted:
O'Gara's Crusaders attack runs riot in nine-try Chiefs hammering
O'Gara's Crusaders attack runs riot in nine-try Chiefs hammering
There is no stopping the Super Rugby champions as they extended their winning run to 19 matches.
-
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Cyclops said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Is Will Jordan now the number one fullback for the Crusaders?
Let’s not get carried away now. Havili still first choice. Reads the game very well.
The added bonus we have is that with Havili and Ennor in the XV we can select a specialist outside back on the bench (ie Jordan).
I think we'll see Havili used a fair bit in the midfield to cover for the need to rest Crotty and Goodhue (and prep for next year). So might be a fair bit of rotation among Havili, Crotty, Goodhue and Jordan (and Ennor) - including time on the bench for each.
Barring injury, I don't think we'll see much of Tim Bateman.
-
@Machpants said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
What, like every weekend when every Euro or Jap team is referred to as [overseas kiwi name]'s team on the round up on stuff?
Exactly. Wouldn’t have won the game without them. Same in the Six Nations.
It’s a tired cliche in media at this stage.
-
@Machpants said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
What, like every weekend when every Euro or Jap team is referred to as [overseas kiwi name]'s team on the round up on stuff?
yep, pretty much. Although arguably playing for, adn being assistant coach of, is somewhat different
