Crusaders v Chiefs
-
-
-
@Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Sounds like Hammett may need to come in and clear out some of the senior players.
Absolutely primed for a Hammett intervention.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Sounds like Hammett may need to come in and clear out some of the senior players.
Absolutely primed for a Hammett intervention.
Even better, we might lure Scott Robertson home with the promise of Chiefs games at Blake Park and a post match surf at Clyde Street.
-
-
-
@canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.
Don't forget the 'culture change'
Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.
-
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.
Don't forget the 'culture change'
Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.
They still have BBBR, DMac, ALB and Cane in the team, moving them to other franchises is a job for Hammett.
-
@Nepia said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.
Don't forget the 'culture change'
Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.
They still have BBBR, DMac, ALB and Cane in the team, moving them to other franchises is a job for Hammett.
Think we need to start a Hammett for Chiefs campaign.
BBBR and Cane can bolster the Canes pack (it's a natural fit for Cane in particular).
DMac can head north to try and fill the hole Spencer left at 10.
ALB could make a go of things at the Highlanders, try and get a few more "names" instead of "no-names" on their roster.
-
@No-Quarter it will be an awesome contest between the two giants Blackwell and BBBR for starting spot at the Canes. The Wellingtonian will probably have the edge.
-
@Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@No-Quarter it will be an awesome contest between the two giants Blackwell and BBBR for starting spot at the Canes. The Wellingtonian will probably have the edge.
TBF, a Magpies lock is going to struggle to even get a contract at the Canes, BBBR to the Highlanders I guess.
-
-
-
@Nepia said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Chris-B said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
If you Chiefs boys want Hammer you'd better get a move on - before the ABs get their hands on him!
Your jokes aren’t funny!
Agree he took it too far with that one.
-
@No-Quarter said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
- ALB
- Goodhue
The thought gives me warm feels
Fucking this. With the bulldozer from Wellington on the bench. Loving our midfield options right now.
ALB 12 / Goodhue 13 has been my favoured combination since the test last year that ALB played or came on at 12 in and looked a million bucks. Their combination of skills gives me a chubby.
-
@cgrant said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Havili could be useful on the bench since he covers several positions. The Crusaders are blessed with good players, this is a kind of problem the other franchises would probably like to be embarrassed with.
Wasn’t the case a couple of years ago when Nadolo and McNicholl left and we signed Ioane, but since then the academy and has done its job via a combination of retention and recruitment with the emergence of Bridge, Ennor and Jordan plus they’ve persevered with Mataele and now we’re flush when you add in Havili’i and Dagg. We haven’t even seen Leicester F yet, plus there’s also Ngani Punivai in the wings (ahem).
