• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
381 Posts 33 Posters 8.1k Views
Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #347

    @taniwharugby said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    going by previous match ups, Japan shouldnt really be a contest...therefore, if it is, it means we are playing shite, and I've bailed on enough AB games this year...plus I got sponsor tickets to the BF game in the flash seats

    Definitely if the choice is the live RWC experience then that’s an easy choice.
    AB Japan game will be more about analysing how the seconds go.
    BFs game may also be a done deal result wise but this will go down as an iconic RWC like 87 for the men’s game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #348

    @Crucial said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @MN5 said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @MiketheSnow said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @Crucial said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    NZ v Wales quarter clashes with the ABs v Japan.

    I guess that the RWC draw was done way before the ABs confirmed their game. BFs were always sceduled as host to have their quarter in that slot, at that ground wherever they finished after pools.

    I think I will have to decide which one to watch live as flicking between Sky and Spark is bound to be a pain.

    ABs every time

    Absolutely.

    Call me a chauvinist but it’s not even close.

    Chauvinist

    To be fair the list of things I’d rather do than watch the Black Ferns is extremely long

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #349

    @MN5 said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @Crucial said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @MN5 said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @MiketheSnow said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @Crucial said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    NZ v Wales quarter clashes with the ABs v Japan.

    I guess that the RWC draw was done way before the ABs confirmed their game. BFs were always sceduled as host to have their quarter in that slot, at that ground wherever they finished after pools.

    I think I will have to decide which one to watch live as flicking between Sky and Spark is bound to be a pain.

    ABs every time

    Absolutely.

    Call me a chauvinist but it’s not even close.

    Chauvinist

    To be fair the list of things I’d rather do than watch the Black Ferns is extremely long

    Really? I am seriously enjoying watching this RWC. It’s like hopping into a Delorean and going back to the early days of pro rugby in the men’s game. Not as programmed and defence oriented. Lots of opportunities for skill to show out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #350
    This post is deleted!
    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #351
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #352

    @KiwiMurph said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @Davesofthunder said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    This clash does seem a needless own goal when we are hosting the RWC.

    More brilliant work by Mark Robinson and his gang....

    Both games will be on Stan in Aus so will fire up the laptop and tv at the same time.

    Pretty fucking incompetent, they should fucking resign. Again

    NZR admitted not understanding the World Cup rules. “When Japan Rugby set the kick-off time for the All Blacks Test, NZR did not take into account ... that the host nation would play in the quarter-final two timeslot,” it read.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #353

    France with the lead v Italy as expected but they aren’t looking that good. They try to go wide but Italy catching them behind the advantage line or forcing an error every time.
    I’m sure that if they just hit it up they would make easy ground but so far I am not seeing much that the BFs couldn’t handle.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #354

    Very strange game. Italy look to have no chance of even scoring but are handling France fairly easily on defence.
    I suspect the France coaches will remind them where their strengths are at half time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #355

    @Crucial after the start I thought France would run riot

    Good refereeing of that head contact

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #356

    Oz just scored a very good try through a midfield break against England. Good signs for us.

    19-5 at HT

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #357

    I am seriously wondering if it is a thing with the refs as a group that they are allowing players latitude to get away from the back of the ruck.
    So many examples that would be pinged in the mens game that are let go. Just watch England do it 3 times in one play.
    Cocksedge was going nuts at the ref yesterday about it (and the hands all over the ball). Ref just shrugs it off. Although someone may have had a word in her ear at halftime as she did tidy things up a bit second half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #358

    England bt Oz 39-5

    Predictable win and predictable play.
    If England have any other tricks they are keeping them well hidden.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #359

    Replying to this here:

    @taniwharugby said in Japan v All Blacks:

    @Crucial I do wonder if they need a size 4.5 ball for womens rugby, slightly lighter and smaller than the mens size 5, but not as small as the ones they use for some kids grades

    There have been discussions about this among women's rugby experts (coaches, current and former players) - I think one or two years ago - and the main view seemed to be that they should focus on coaching and improving skills and keep playing with the size 5 ball. They considered there is still plenty of room for improvement through coaching.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #360

    @Stargazer I reckon it's not too dissimilar to when we went away from that heavy leather adidas ball.

    At least they looked at it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #361

    Answered this in the other thread then realized it should be here.

    Ball size isn’t much of a problem. Core and arm/shoulder strength can be when combined with lower level coaches from the men’s game that set fields that way they would for men. Eg spread back lines
    Just like coaching youth players, if you can get them to stand closer you get better play.
    At the pro women’s level the problem reduces and most players will now go through academy programs with S&C development.
    With kicking it is simply a time thing and stupidly a bit of an afterthought relying on players doing extras and putting their hands up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #362

    Another game where an Aussie cops contact to the head at a ruck.

    Another yellow card given in place of a red.

    Yes, we might complain overly about refs giving them opposition a leg up, but you can occasionally see what we mean.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #363

    @NTA said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    Another game where an Aussie cops contact to the head at a ruck.

    Another yellow card given in place of a red.

    Yes, we might complain overly about refs giving them opposition a leg up, but you can occasionally see what we mean.

    Excuse my ignorance, I watch next to no women's rugby, but is the women's game having the same issues around head contact as the men's game? I'm not talking about people suffering brain injuries, more in relation to head contact happening multiple times a game and people being penalised seemingly based on fairly random factors such as whether or not someone gets hurt.

    I ask because I'm really seeking to understand if head contact is just an unfortunate and inevitable consequence of the game per se, or simply an issue with the men's professional game.

    CrucialC NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #364

    @junior said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    @NTA said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    Another game where an Aussie cops contact to the head at a ruck.

    Another yellow card given in place of a red.

    Yes, we might complain overly about refs giving them opposition a leg up, but you can occasionally see what we mean.

    Excuse my ignorance, I watch next to no women's rugby, but is the women's game having the same issues around head contact as the men's game? I'm not talking about people suffering brain injuries, more in relation to head contact happening multiple times a game and people being penalised seemingly based on fairly random factors such as whether or not someone gets hurt.

    I ask because I'm really seeking to understand if head contact is just an unfortunate and inevitable consequence of the game per se, or simply an issue with the men's professional game.

    This RWC is being very very reluctant to dish out reds.
    I wouldn’t go so far as to say the refs have been told directly to avoid it but they do seem to be looking more for reasons not to.
    I get that WR doesn’t want this showcase to grow the game to be marred by reds but some of it is baffling.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #365

    @junior said in Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host:

    Excuse my ignorance, I watch next to no women's rugby, but is the women's game having the same issues around head contact as the men's game?

    That's the thing right? We see next to zero women's rugby so it's hard to judge.

    However, as @Crucial says: the refs are tying themselves in knots to avoid it. Have seen multiple head contacts across a few games that aren't even reviewed. When they are, they seem to lean heavily toward yellow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #366

    Watching Canada v USA now.

    Around 45:30 on the clock but nearly a minute until the TMO gets it on the radar.

    Blue 12 charging into contact to tackle red 6. Head on head. Not passive. No attempt to lower height into contact. No significant drop from ball carrier.

    No mitigation that I can see but ref argues there is not a high level of danger.

    Yellow given. Fucking what??

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Womens RWC 2021 -NZ to host
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.