• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks V All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
842 Posts 75 Posters 56.4k Views
Springboks V All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #736

    Other option is DMac on the wing instead of Naholo

    HoorooH DuluthD broughieB 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #737

    @kirwan That get's us back to the successful 'play two fullbacks' routine that worked for quite some time

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #738

    @kirwan said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Other option is DMac on the wing instead of Naholo

    Yes I would go for that. I prefer having a second fullback in the back three and Jordie's form has dipped.

    He would still be involved in back field runs, picking out slower defenders, and he can drift into first receiver often. You would get most of the benefits of McKenzie without him having a huge amount of responsibility.

    I wouldn't have him covering 10 from the wing, I would still have Mo'unga on the bench

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #739

    @chester-draws I'm not talking about individuals. I'm talking about a starting backline unit that includes all four "rookies".

    Ioane will obviously start. I suspect Goodhue might get paired with one of SBW or Crotty. ALB will probably be on the bench.

    Switching out the two time World Player of the Year for a guy with currently one test start (which was far from flawless)?

    I don't see it. That would be a bigger call than ditching McCaw for Sam Cane! 🙂

    Remember Shag fielded Carter, Nonu, Conrad Smith - guys all at the end of their test careers and with 300+ caps between them - and he was happy to run NMS alongside them.

    And aside from these guys he had McCaw. He wanted to have Woodcock. He wheeled Kevvy Mealamu out of a rest home.... 🙂

    And at the end of the day, Danny Boy especially, showed why those years of experience were so valuable.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #740

    @duluth Not out of the question. I do recall a test that Hansen went with Carter, Cruden and B. Barrett all in the team.

    Chris B.C voodooV 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #741

    @act-crusader If they're going down that path perhaps they should get Toddy Blackadder on the coaching staff?

    No-one knows more about playing three first fives in a XV than Toddy - he might even have occasionally used four! 🙂

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #742

    Is BB starts at 10 then clearly Mo'unga is on the bench and I can't find room for D-Mac in my 22. And I think that's my preferred lineup TBH. I just don't trust D-Mac with any responsibility in a tight game, on either end of the park, whether at 10, 14 or 15.

    BonesB Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #743

    My only concern with dmac on the wing before seeing how it would go ,

    Is if his lack of height could be exposed with the opposition putting in cross field kicks in one on one aerial battles .

    BonesB antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #744

    @voodoo said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Is BB starts at 10 then clearly Mo'unga is on the bench and I can't find room for D-Mac in my 22. And I think that's my preferred lineup TBH. I just don't trust D-Mac with any responsibility in a tight game, on either end of the park, whether at 10, 14 or 15.

    Ah ha....could be because there's now 23? Shit you have been away a while!

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #745

    @bones said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @voodoo said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Is BB starts at 10 then clearly Mo'unga is on the bench and I can't find room for D-Mac in my 22. And I think that's my preferred lineup TBH. I just don't trust D-Mac with any responsibility in a tight game, on either end of the park, whether at 10, 14 or 15.

    Ah ha....could be because there's now 23? Shit you have been away a while!

    Bwaha, old habits! I'm also still using S-14 and the Tri Nations BTW!

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #746

    @kiwiinmelb said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    My only concern with dmac on the wing before seeing how it would go ,

    Is if his lack of height could be exposed with the opposition putting in cross field kicks in one on one aerial battles .

    I think people make too much of the height thing - the guy can definitely get off the ground and is pretty accurate. It's not often you see a blazing break just because one guy was taller than the other, from a cross field kick. Maybe relevant if he's marking Folau, but even then, what happens? Cross field kicks are useful when the man on the outside is unmarked, not when they're having to compete for the ball.

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #747

    @voodoo said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @bones said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @voodoo said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Is BB starts at 10 then clearly Mo'unga is on the bench and I can't find room for D-Mac in my 22. And I think that's my preferred lineup TBH. I just don't trust D-Mac with any responsibility in a tight game, on either end of the park, whether at 10, 14 or 15.

    Ah ha....could be because there's now 23? Shit you have been away a while!

    Bwaha, old habits! I'm also still using S-14 and the Tri Nations BTW!

    That's ok, we could discuss the NPC together.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #748

    Been following the discussion on BB.

    1. Dmac won't start on the wing, hes behind Ioana (clearly), BFA & Naholo, not to mention Jordie Barrett seems to be favoured as a 15 before Dmac this year.

    2. I'd like to see more discussion about whether the issues lay more with Aaron Smith than Beaudy.
      I feel that when DC played, it was clear who was the on-field general tactics wise. Richie's team management is next level compared to Kieran Read.
      I think when we talk about AB leadership and driving the team, maybe we have too many chiefs at the moment. Aaron Smith did some dumb shit in that last test - I reckon if he got back to giving Beaudy the ball quicker and letting the 10 drive things we'd be better off.

    3. If Mo'unga starts 10, BB at 15, BFA at 14, and Ioane 11. Who shifts at the 60min mark to accomodate Dmac coming on? because I don't see where one of those starters makes way...

    For me (if the RWC final was tomorrow and no-one was injured, its
    10. BB
    11. Ioane
    14. Naholo
    15. BFA
    with Mo'unga on the bench.

    as for preferential halfback and midfield, leave it for another day....

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #749

    @bones said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @kiwiinmelb said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    My only concern with dmac on the wing before seeing how it would go ,

    Is if his lack of height could be exposed with the opposition putting in cross field kicks in one on one aerial battles .

    I think people make too much of the height thing - the guy can definitely get off the ground and is pretty accurate. It's not often you see a blazing break just because one guy was taller than the other, from a cross field kick. Maybe relevant if he's marking Folau, but even then, what happens? Cross field kicks are useful when the man on the outside is unmarked, not when they're having to compete for the ball.

    You are probably right , and they have no hesitation in playing nms there when his attacking game is on ,

    dmac is certainly better in the air than him

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #750

    @voodoo As above, I reckon Beauden is locked in as the starting 10.

    DMac vs Richie on the bench is more likely the call Hansen is considering.

    I don't think that one is clear-cut - before last weekend, I think most people would have said the job was DMac's. Remember, he had a pretty good test starting at 10 vs. France and there were comments on here along the lines that he could clearly do things at 10 that Mo'unga couldn't.

    And then a few weeks later, Beaudy scored four (actually five) tries vs Australia and the Beaudy vs Richie conversation was smothered by an industrial size feather pillow! 🙂

    BovidaeB No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #751

    @kiwiinmelb said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    My only concern with dmac on the wing before seeing how it would go ,

    Is if his lack of height could be exposed with the opposition putting in cross field kicks in one on one aerial battles .

    Have him mark Folau..?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #752

    @chris-b said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I don't think that one is clear-cut - before last weekend, I think most people would have said the job was DMac's. Remember, he had a pretty good test starting at 10 vs. France and there were comments on here along the lines that he could clearly do things at 10 that Mo'unga couldn't.

    Some common sense. I reckon before DMac went home he would have been on the bench in Arg, as he has been most of the year, and probably in Pretoria too. It's good to have options but we might have to wait until the Eng and Irish tests to see how the coaches intend to maximise the talent available.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #753

    @chris-b said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @chester-draws I'm not talking about individuals. I'm talking about a starting backline unit that includes all four "rookies".

    Ioane will obviously start. I suspect Goodhue might get paired with one of SBW or Crotty. ALB will probably be on the bench.

    Switching out the two time World Player of the Year for a guy with currently one test start (which was far from flawless)?

    I don't see it. That would be a bigger call than ditching McCaw for Sam Cane! 🙂

    Remember Shag fielded Carter, Nonu, Conrad Smith - guys all at the end of their test careers and with 300+ caps between them - and he was happy to run NMS alongside them.

    And aside from these guys he had McCaw. He wanted to have Woodcock. He wheeled Kevvy Mealamu out of a rest home.... 🙂

    And at the end of the day, Danny Boy especially, showed why those years of experience were so valuable.

    yea fuck that must have been a really tough selection meeting you're right

    Well guys, who do we go? I guess at 10 we may as well slot in the greatest 10 of all time. at 12? Well, there is a guy in the squad who is arguably the greatest of the pro-era, certainly for the last 4 years. At 13? Well there's that skinny white guy who is as good as anyone we have ever had. And oh look! they are all bang in form and injury free. Okay, then i guess we slot them in aye?

    What about up front? Well, at 7, i guess we pick the skipper. He's only the greatest rugby player of all time. Could do a job. Loosehead? 100 tests and a try in the World Cup final? oh, he's injured. shit. Anyone better at the bench hooker spot than Kev yet? no? okay well i guess a fuck-ton of tests helps push him over the line. And oh look, he's playing that role beautifully as well.

    Seriously, that 23 in 2015 was fucking ridiculous. Picked itself, and probably coached itself. And our GOAT veterans all turned up form-wise.

    This i see as a different situation. The guys in the pole position aren't doing a job, but more importantly when compared to 2015, don't have the body of work behind them to show that all will be well when the moment comes. Obviously the coaches know waaay more than me, and to be honest have earned the benefit of the doubt, but this looks a bit like experience for experience sake being the wrong choice in this instance.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #754

    @westcoastie said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I'd like to see more discussion about whether the issues lay more with Aaron Smith than Beaudy.
    I feel that when DC played, it was clear who was the on-field general tactics wise. Richie's team management is next level compared to Kieran Read.
    I think when we talk about AB leadership and driving the team, maybe we have too many chiefs at the moment. Aaron Smith did some dumb shit in that last test - I reckon if he got back to giving Beaudy the ball quicker and letting the 10 drive things we'd be better off.

    There is a certain amount of truth to this, A Smith was poor in the first 50 minutes of Saturday. He wasn't helped by some of the worst ball presentation i have seen from an AB side in recent years. But that doesn't excuse some of the decision making, and the inaccuracy of the kicking.

    But writing BB's issues off to the halfback is some serious whitewashing. A Smith wasn't at fault for the awful, awful kicking game; the stand and shovel passing game; or the distinct lack of run.

    For a number of years, the forwards have been run by the 9, who then guns it to the 10 when he wants it.

    westcoastieW 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #755

    @mariner4life Tony Woodcock didn't. He looked like he was on his last legs at that tournament, but they'd stuck with him through thick and thin rather than bringing in a rookie Joe Moody.

    They'd previously persisted on and on and on with Mealamu and Hore, pretty much beyond the bounds of common sense IMO. Eventually Coles came along, but Codie Taylor went to the RWC with 60 minutes of test rugby under his belt - basically because there was no alternative to Mealamu been developed.

    Unfortunately Cruden got injured, so we never got to see the call that would have been made, but Danny Boy showed he was the man for the job.

    There was a guy from the Waikato who was adamant all year that Cane should replace McCaw. 🙂

    But, I'm not arguing so much about individuals as about Hansen's track record. Sure, he'll pick new people, but when in doubt, he goes with experience.

    I think he learned a lesson in 2007, when he ended up with Leonard, McAlister and Toeava calling the shots!

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Springboks V All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.