• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks V All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
842 Posts 75 Posters 56.4k Views
Springboks V All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #725

    Funny how it has taken this long for everyone to realise that BB is not the type of 10 we require for a tight game that needs control and measured tactics.
    It has been being pointed out for years that he is not a game managing 10.

    mariner4lifeM No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #726

    @crucial said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Funny how it has taken this long for everyone to realise that BB is not the type of 10 we require for a tight game that needs control and measured tactics.
    It has been being pointed out for years that he is not a game managing 10.

    Yea wow crucial, literally no one else has been saying exactly that in the past...

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #727

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @crucial said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Funny how it has taken this long for everyone to realise that BB is not the type of 10 we require for a tight game that needs control and measured tactics.
    It has been being pointed out for years that he is not a game managing 10.

    Yea wow crucial, literally no one else has been saying exactly that in the past...

    I didn’t say no one.
    Whenever the subject cane up though, there were always plenty of BB10 defenders.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #728

    Man, I have missed this place, good to see it hasn't changed too much.

    Clearly this post doesn't add anything of value to the discussion, I'm just easing my way back in...πŸ˜‰

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #729

    For what it’s worth, Sam Whitelock is first picked in my team. Along with Moody, Taylor, Franks, Read, Scott Barrett....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #730

    @voodoo welcome back bro.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #731

    @act-crusader Good to be back!

    I'm clearly late to this discussion, but some quick and random thoughts:

    • A Smith seems well off the boil of late (the difference to Faf was stark), any thoughts as to whether this is a 9-10 combination thing or something more sinister? Would be interesting to see him inside Richie for 70mins
    • Midfield - I don't have the answer to the SBW/Goodhue/ALB/Crotty/Laumape conundrum, but I do know that we are 12 months out from a RWC and I seem to recall tournaments past where we entered RWC's with an unsettled midfield. I'm of a mind that we need pin our colours to a mast soon and run with it for the next 12 months for better or worse. Combinations are king.
    • Jeez we miss BBBR
    • I'd give my left nut to be a fly on the wall and hear Shag and the team discuss pre/post-mortem tactics for the game just gone. Do they genuinely believe that kicking that much ball away is the way to play/ That the cross-kick to the touchline is a good option when you finally get possession after defending for 5 minutes? I don't buy the arrogant "putting ourselves under pressure" line, but how can these possibly be sensible tactics?
    • I'm a big fan of finishing a game with Richie at 10, BB at 15 and Bender on the wing - but I'm totally torn as to whether we should we start with that
    • Sam Cane - fark, what a beast. Nothing flashy about that man, just body on the line all night long. Hope he's OK
    • Ardie - way to step up the last 2 games, O for Awesome that man
    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #732

    @rocky-rockbottom said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @voodoo said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @act-crusader Good to be back!
    Would be interesting to see him inside Richie for 70mins

    Doesn't need that long afterdavid

    ahhhhhhh

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    wrote on last edited by
    #733

    Finally found a minute to comment on this game. And what i really want to say is:

    Fuck you All Blacks.
    Seriously, when are you guys going to learn to lose?!
    You spoiled a good game of rugby because after 10 years, you still haven't properly leant the skill of losing a rugby game.

    πŸ™‚
    note: the smiley face is just insurance before one of you takes the above comments all wrong...

    Bloody dramatic game. Gutted to be on the wrong side of the result. But probably balances the books a bit if one recalls Wellington. Still work to do for the Boks. But pleasingly they at least keep learning. And the big lesson of the day... you need a bench that delivers. BIG difference on the day.

    @ Sam Kane: hope you make a swift and full recovery. You're a pain-in-the-ass to play against. Respect.

    1 Reply Last reply
    13
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #734

    Geez! @voodoo welcome back! Talk about rising from the ashes! πŸ™‚ Next thing we will see is @Fullermorg , @Gospel and @eagle will return!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Crucial on last edited by No Quarter
    #735

    @crucial said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Funny how it has taken this long for everyone to realise that BB is not the type of 10 we require for a tight game that needs control and measured tactics.
    It has been being pointed out for years that he is not a game managing 10.

    I think the "defenders" mainly pointed out that he was still the best 10 in the country. Sops form fell off a cliff and he buggered off, DMac has no game management, and Mo'unga has only come of age as a consistent player at the top level this year. Otherwise the cupboard has been bare, and it's not like Beauden has struggled - when on form he's turned tight tests into blowouts.

    Now we have a more traditional 10 in Mo'unga it will be interesting to see where Beauden fits in. Most (all?) on here agree he's not a perfect fit for 10 but he must be on the field as he's an absolute freak of a rugby player. I said earlier in the thread my preference is for Mo'unga to start at 10, Beauden 15 and DMac off the bench - I think that maximises all three players talents.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #736

    Other option is DMac on the wing instead of Naholo

    HoorooH DuluthD broughieB 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #737

    @kirwan That get's us back to the successful 'play two fullbacks' routine that worked for quite some time

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #738

    @kirwan said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Other option is DMac on the wing instead of Naholo

    Yes I would go for that. I prefer having a second fullback in the back three and Jordie's form has dipped.

    He would still be involved in back field runs, picking out slower defenders, and he can drift into first receiver often. You would get most of the benefits of McKenzie without him having a huge amount of responsibility.

    I wouldn't have him covering 10 from the wing, I would still have Mo'unga on the bench

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #739

    @chester-draws I'm not talking about individuals. I'm talking about a starting backline unit that includes all four "rookies".

    Ioane will obviously start. I suspect Goodhue might get paired with one of SBW or Crotty. ALB will probably be on the bench.

    Switching out the two time World Player of the Year for a guy with currently one test start (which was far from flawless)?

    I don't see it. That would be a bigger call than ditching McCaw for Sam Cane! πŸ™‚

    Remember Shag fielded Carter, Nonu, Conrad Smith - guys all at the end of their test careers and with 300+ caps between them - and he was happy to run NMS alongside them.

    And aside from these guys he had McCaw. He wanted to have Woodcock. He wheeled Kevvy Mealamu out of a rest home.... πŸ™‚

    And at the end of the day, Danny Boy especially, showed why those years of experience were so valuable.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #740

    @duluth Not out of the question. I do recall a test that Hansen went with Carter, Cruden and B. Barrett all in the team.

    Chris B.C voodooV 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #741

    @act-crusader If they're going down that path perhaps they should get Toddy Blackadder on the coaching staff?

    No-one knows more about playing three first fives in a XV than Toddy - he might even have occasionally used four! πŸ™‚

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #742

    Is BB starts at 10 then clearly Mo'unga is on the bench and I can't find room for D-Mac in my 22. And I think that's my preferred lineup TBH. I just don't trust D-Mac with any responsibility in a tight game, on either end of the park, whether at 10, 14 or 15.

    BonesB Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #743

    My only concern with dmac on the wing before seeing how it would go ,

    Is if his lack of height could be exposed with the opposition putting in cross field kicks in one on one aerial battles .

    BonesB antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #744

    @voodoo said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Is BB starts at 10 then clearly Mo'unga is on the bench and I can't find room for D-Mac in my 22. And I think that's my preferred lineup TBH. I just don't trust D-Mac with any responsibility in a tight game, on either end of the park, whether at 10, 14 or 15.

    Ah ha....could be because there's now 23? Shit you have been away a while!

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    5

Springboks V All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.