• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
278 Posts 46 Posters 15.2k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #226

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @pukunui said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Two things.

    1. Has a deliberate knock down really jumped from a penalty to an automatic yellow card as the commentators seem to keep suggesting? Or are they talking shit again. Either way im sick of these things. Turning me off the game big time.

    This is what the lawyer, who defends cited players before the WR and SANZAAR judiciary has to say about that:

    Fantastic. That is exactly what i wanted to see. It has been creeping into the commentary more and more. IMO that law's worth is debatable in the first place when it is a penalty only. To have constant calls for automatic yellow on top gives me the shits.

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #227

    @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Laumape defended poorly and his ordinarily eye-catching wrecking-ball runs were nowhere to be seen. Was there also an appalling kick? Truly showed his lack of dimensions last night.

    Yes also plenty of missed tackles and poor distribution. Not a memorable night.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #228

    Feeling sorry for the lad. Taufua deservedly called into the ABs in May, but couldn't play because of injury. If he had any chance of being called up for the RC, that chance is gone now, too. I know there's disagreement about whether he should be an AB or not, but this is just really tough luck.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #229

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Feeling sorry for the lad. Taufua deservedly called into the ABs in May, but couldn't play because of injury. If he had any chance of being called up for the RC, that chance is gone now, too. I know there's disagreement about whether he should be an AB or not, but this is just really tough luck.

    Deservedly in you opinion. He’s fine in patches at Super Rugby level, but the Crusaders are stronger with Samu at 6, much better work rate.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #230

    @kirwan Yes, in my opinon and that of the All Blacks selectors. Taufua played at 8 before the June break and was massive until then. It was only after not playing for weeks due to injury and being moved to 6 that he wasn't as strong as before, although not half as bad as some people want to believe. For example, did anyone notice how he ran through Shields last night?

    KiwiMurphK KirwanK antipodeanA 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #231

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @kirwan For example, did anyone notice how he ran through Shields last night?

    Before he got the ball ripped off him by Jordie.

    StargazerS taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by Stargazer
    #232

    @kiwimurph Yep indeed, but it is funny that some people on here only look at that last part, and not at the first, when talking about some players.

    alt text

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #233

    @kiwimurph bro, you can discount anything like that when done by a Barrett, those fellas are gods and do anything better than anyone else!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #234

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @kirwan Yes, in my opinon and that of the All Blacks selectors. Taufua played at 8 before the June break and was massive until then. It was only after not playing for weeks due to injury and being moved to 6 that he wasn't as strong as before, although not half as bad as some people want to believe. For example, did anyone notice how he ran through Shields last night?

    I’d guess they have a line through his name for covering six, which will reduce his squad value dramatically.

    Watching players scoot past him from scrums, he might as well not be there.

    And it’s not like the AB selectors aren’t wrong sometimes or take a punt sometimes. Look at Fifita.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #235

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    For example, did anyone notice how he ran through Shields last night?

    We're setting the bar that low?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #236

    @antipodean Just one example.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #237

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @kiwimurph Yep indeed, but it is funny that some people on here only look at that last part, and not at the first, when talking about some players.

    alt text

    Those glasses are twice as large as they need to be.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #238

    @nzzp 😄 I could make the picture smaller ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #239

    @cyclops said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @chris-b yeah the canes game plan was puzzling, kicking for one, but even with the saders mid-field is usually pretty tough to crack, Laumape barely ran at it with any venom to test it last night

    It looked even more puzzling because when they final had someone (Savea I think) hit it up in midfield he broke the line and made a good 20-30 metres. But then they never tried it again. It felt a bit like the 'canes had out-thought themselves, trying to double bluff the crusaders and hoping that Laumape would draw defenders in by reputation creating opportunities elsewhere, and then for whatever reason didn't switch up when that wasn't working.

    I'm still confused about the application of the rules for Barrett's almost-try. I get that because the ref stopped play the restart is a scrum, but surely the ball was still live after it was placed, so the 'turnover' (i..e Bridge picking up the ball after Barrett placed it) was good so it should have been a Crusader's feed?

    Probably a Canes penalty as the player picking it up didn't come through the gate

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #240

    @pukunui said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @pukunui said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Two things.

    1. Has a deliberate knock down really jumped from a penalty to an automatic yellow card as the commentators seem to keep suggesting? Or are they talking shit again. Either way im sick of these things. Turning me off the game big time.

    This is what the lawyer, who defends cited players before the WR and SANZAAR judiciary has to say about that:

    Fantastic. That is exactly what i wanted to see. It has been creeping into the commentary more and more. IMO that law's worth is debatable in the first place when it is a penalty only. To have constant calls for automatic yellow on top gives me the shits.

    I think the fern's favourite Justin can be blamed for the way this is being dealt with now. He went on and on about it a couple of seasons ago.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #241

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    At least last night's game eases the AB midfield 'logjam' with Laumape having by far his worst game of the season. No pressure to select him now.

    Agreed. His defense was woeful at times - it’s a real shame because, on attack, I think he has the tools to be awesome at the next level. On defense though, he looks a liability right now.

    I would prefer to see Aso (best position looks to be 12 and he's too good not to start) starting at 12 next year with Laumape as an impact player. At this stage he's too one dimensional. If a team defends well Laumape is ordinary

    DiceD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #242

    Laumape reminds me of Sam Tuitupou in many ways. Similarly limited but good enough at what he does well to please people when he’s on.

    ACT CrusaderA P 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #243

    I must admit, after watching this game, I believe Richie is the answer to the rush defence.

    His option taking and passing in tight spaces were brilliant.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #244

    @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Laumape reminds me of Sam Tuitupou in many ways. Similarly limited but good enough at what he does well to please people when he’s on.

    Sammy T moved well laterally on defence. Laumape can hit hard in the tackle like Tuitupou but struggles with an all round defensive game.

    DiceD 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #245

    I know some arent fans of Phil Gifford, but good interview with Darcy on RS where they talk Razor and Crusaders

    Definitely some interesting bits in there about Razor!

    starts about 8 mins
    http://120.138.20.16/WeekOnDemand/radiosport/2018.07.30-17.00.00-S.mp3

    http://120.138.20.16/WeekOnDemand/radiosport/2018.07.30-17.15.00-S.mp3

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.