• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
278 Posts 46 Posters 15.2k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    Well I'd just like to thank the Crusaders for using a bit of lube and starting slow before getting down to business. Even giving us a little something at the end.

    May I suggest discarding the lube for next week, and giving whoever turns up at AMI Stadium a raping they will never forget.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #173

    Decent effort from Brad Shields with the kick.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    replied to canefan on last edited by dingo
    #174

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @dingo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    So why is DMac in the AB matchday 23 and Mounga not?

    You'd think the BB/Mounga combination (with BB dropping back to 15) would be better than the BB/DMac combination too.

    This is a great point. I think that combo gives us more options and provides potentially better security if BB is crocked

    I agree but maybe only because of seeing Mounga in this Super season. He seems to be both the better injury replacement for BB if that happens, but also a pretty good impact replacement if BB drops back to 15 (with a reshuffle in back three depending on who is playing well). Just seems to give more positive options than DMac.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #175

    Why didn't they defend like that for the other 80?

    Then record breaking try, fucking annoying.

    Go Brad, nice kick, better than ninety percent of the rest of the canes kicks

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #176

    @donsteppa said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    A very soft attempted tackle gets the Canes a consolation try.

    Great pass by West!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by Toddy
    #177

    I've never appreciated Todd Blackadder as much as I do right now.

    He effectively gave other teams a chance for 8 years.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #178

    DMac is there over Mo’unga because several NZ rugby journalists and the AB’s brains trust seem to be blindly in love with the razzle dazzle and “exciting risk taking” of DMac. Which is so amazing that we have to convert him to first five so he can cause even more damag... err... sorry... exciting plays.

    Yeah, I’m still sulking about last week.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #179

    @kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @mikethesnow said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Can someone explain why BB's too short attempt resulted in a Canes scrum please?

    For me it's lost control of the ball in the field of play, knock on Canes.

    Should have allowed advantage to Crusaders or scrum feed Crusaders?

    Ref said he blew the whistle to stop play so scrum attacking team (Canes).

    Ta

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #180

    Good to see Dane Coles stringing a few words together as waterboy in the post game huddle

    WingerW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #181

    @kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    So why is DMac in the AB matchday 23 and Mounga not?

    He is Lima, clearly they don't see him as an impact player. He could shut a game down though

    Thats what i dont get. Mounga has a ton of attacking ability and a heap of pace. I dont see why he couldnt be a bench impact player.

    The whole perception is reality thing I guess. A bit like how BB was shoehorned as the best impact player in the world a few years back - it seems the selectors see DMac as that man now. They clearly have a plan and they’ll stick with it, as they like to do.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by dingo
    #182

    @donsteppa said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    DMac is there over Mo’unga because several NZ rugby journalists and the AB’s brains trust seem to be blindly in love with the razzle dazzle and “exciting risk taking” of DMac. Which is so amazing that we have to convert him to first five so he can cause even more damag... err... sorry... exciting plays.

    Yeah, I’m still sulking about last week.

    DMac is the RWC2019 Marc Ellis. There to beat up some minnow on a flat track. Please please please lets have BB and Mounga in the first choice 23 for the important games.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by Gunner
    #183

    Why is an Englishman doing the post match interview for the Canes?

    NZ Super Rugby captaincy roles should be strictly limited to players with allegiance to the All Blacks.

    🎣

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #184

    Two things.

    1. How the fuck is Fifita an AB? No work rate, no impact and he was walking around like he had been going for 80 mins instead of 5. If i had to pick a Canes loose forward for the ABs it eoukd be Evans.

    2. Has a deliberate knock down really jumped from a penalty to an automatic yellow card as the commentators seem to keep suggesting? Or are they talking shit again. Either way im sick of these things. Turning me off the game big time.

    FrankF H StargazerS boobooB 4 Replies Last reply
    2
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to dingo on last edited by
    #185

    @dingo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @donsteppa said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    DMac is there over Mo’unga because several NZ rugby journalists and the AB’s brains trust seem to be blindly in love with the razzle dazzle and “exciting risk taking” of DMac. Which is so amazing that we have to convert him to first five so he can cause even more damag... err... sorry... exciting plays.

    Yeah, I’m still sulking about last week.

    DMac is the RWC2019 Marc Ellis. There to beat up some minnow on a flat track. Please please please lets have BB and Mounga in the first choice 23 for the important games.

    Some people are being a little unfair to DMac. He is #2 because he 'won' the position by playing well against the French. Hansen likes players who has done the job for him in the past and he has done that. I don't recall a lot about Marc Ellis but D Mac is no flat track bully. He is one of the best attacking players in the game. He is probably the best player in the world at creating something from nothing. His problem is that he makes glaring errors (interceptions and charge downs). Even when Beauden isn't on form, it's rare he is a liability.

    Maybe you lose a game 12-6 with D Mac playing but more often the score isn't going to be close like that when he is out there.

    D antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #186

    @pukunui said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    1. How the fuck is Fifita an AB?

    He's a 'special athlete'.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #187

    @pukunui said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Two things.

    1. How the fuck is Fifita an AB? No work rate, no impact and he was walking around like he had been going for 80 mins instead of 5. If i had to pick a Canes loose forward for the ABs it eoukd be Evans.

    2. Has a deliberate knock down really jumped from a penalty to an automatic yellow card as the commentators seem to keep suggesting? Or are they talking shit again. Either way im sick of these things. Turning me off the game big time.

    If a deliberate knock down is ever going to be a yellow, Tamanivalu basically had to go. You can dive and catch a rugby ball but he only dived with one out stretched hand. I think a deliberate knock should only be a yellow if it is also a professional foul but that isn't how it has been ruled.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #188

    @frank said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @pukunui said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    1. How the fuck is Fifita an AB?

    He's a 'special athlete'.

    He's not on the plane to Yokohama yet

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by dingo
    #189

    @hydro11 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    I don't recall a lot about Marc Ellis

    "I don't recall a lot about Marc Ellis"

    All you need to know about Marc Ellis is why is famous from a RWC perspective. He is famous for it due to a similar characteristic he shares with DMac. Not just being an outside back moved inside but he also looks for what is on for himself first because he backs himself (in my opinion). Its both what makes him good and bad (in a team game) at the same time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    Canes need a new attack coach. Carlos is coming in next year so hope he can full this role because the current one is completely and utterly hopeless. For example why not try Aso starting at 2nd with Laumape coming on with 20 left to try and smash through as an alternative. Team needs to try variety not a limited boring game plan

    What I hope is the coaches change has disrupted things and they can right the ship next year. As the team has been disappointing to watch this year. They look like they are just going through the motions with no real fire or enthusiasm.

    But the Crusaders at full strength (two years running now) are difficult to beat at home. Especially against an injury depleted (two years running now - Canes need to look at conditioning staff etc as its getting to the point where questions need to be asked) poorly coached Canes side.

    I hope the Canes can sort this slump out as I find watching them a bit boring now. Losing and exciting I don't mind too much. Losing and boring I do

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #191

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Good to see Dane Coles stringing a few words together as waterboy in the post game huddle

    He's one player we need fully fit and back as captain.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.