2018 Rugby Championship
-
So I’ve seen him listed as 5’11, 5’11 1/2 and 6’0
Whichever is right is neither here nor there, but it would be a bit of a shock if the Boks picked a flanker that size. Don’t really have a view of it either way but it’s not unusual when it comes to the Boks that there are debates about size of loose forwards.
-
@majorrage said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@act-crusader said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
There is a view that Kwagga is too small for a test flanker.
Off the top of my head, I'd think he's bigger than Michael Hooper.
The game plan, style and dare I say culture would dictate a lot around the selection of players in certain positions.
-
@chester-draws said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@act-crusader said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
There is a view that Kwagga is too small for a test flanker.
But it's a stupid view.
The Saffers laughed at Cruden when he first turned up too, because he was "too small".
They'd get a lot better if they stopped worrying about size and worried more about skill.
There's a bit of a difference between a small 10 and a small flanker. Kwagga is listed at around 90kg. He certainly didnt press his claims on Saturday.
-
@kiwimurph said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@chester-draws said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@act-crusader said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
There is a view that Kwagga is too small for a test flanker.
But it's a stupid view.
The Saffers laughed at Cruden when he first turned up too, because he was "too small".
They'd get a lot better if they stopped worrying about size and worried more about skill.
There's a bit of a difference between a small 10 and a small flanker. Kwagga is listed at around 90kg. He certainly didnt press his claims on Saturday.
Was certainly nullified and had very little impact over the ball which is seen as his strength.
-
@kiwimurph said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@chester-draws said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@act-crusader said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
There is a view that Kwagga is too small for a test flanker.
But it's a stupid view.
The Saffers laughed at Cruden when he first turned up too, because he was "too small".
They'd get a lot better if they stopped worrying about size and worried more about skill.
There's a bit of a difference between a small 10 and a small flanker. Kwagga is listed at around 90kg.
Did someone tell him he's playing Super Rugby, not weight for age?
-
@majorrage said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@nepia said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@majorrage said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@act-crusader said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
There is a view that Kwagga is too small for a test flanker.
Off the top of my head, I'd think he's bigger than Michael Hooper.
Taller but lighter I think.
One of those is fixable!
Both in the case of Savea (A)!
-
@act-crusader said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
So I’ve seen him listed as 5’11, 5’11 1/2 and 6’0
Whichever is right is neither here nor there, but it would be a bit of a shock if the Boks picked a flanker that size. Don’t really have a view of it either way but it’s not unusual when it comes to the Boks that there are debates about size of loose forwards.
I think back to Heinrich Brussow, 5' 11" and never lost to ABs in his prime, having the wood on Ritchie. When selected in 2015 it was claimed that for a few years he had lost effectiveness because of too much muscle! Interesting article: https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/70470684/Springbok-flanker-Heinrich-Brussow-has-perfect-record-against-the-All-Blacks
I always did a little cheer after 2011 when the Yaapies overlooked HB for a 6' 5" 17 stoner.
-
@tim said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
Looked a worthwhile exercise with a number stating their case.
Australia's ability to craft & create tries has never been in doubt.
Stopping them is going to be the challenge for this squad.
-
@kiwimurph said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@chester-draws said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@act-crusader said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
There is a view that Kwagga is too small for a test flanker.
But it's a stupid view.
The Saffers laughed at Cruden when he first turned up too, because he was "too small".
They'd get a lot better if they stopped worrying about size and worried more about skill.
There's a bit of a difference between a small 10 and a small flanker. Kwagga is listed at around 90kg. He certainly didnt press his claims on Saturday.
There is no such thing as "too small" in any position.
A player might be ineffective in certain areas due to lacking size, but if he makes up for it in other areas then he should be selected. If he can't compensate with speed, linking, etc then he isn't selected.
NZ selectors get that, but it appears SA really don't. And then they wonder why they can't keep up with our pace!
Saturday isn't much guide. Fly across the world to play with a well beaten side? Marx is the best hooker in the competition, but would you have spotted that on Saturday?
-
@chester-draws said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@kiwimurph said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@chester-draws said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
@act-crusader said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
There is a view that Kwagga is too small for a test flanker.
But it's a stupid view.
The Saffers laughed at Cruden when he first turned up too, because he was "too small".
They'd get a lot better if they stopped worrying about size and worried more about skill.
There's a bit of a difference between a small 10 and a small flanker. Kwagga is listed at around 90kg. He certainly didnt press his claims on Saturday.
There is no such thing as "too small" in any position.
A player might be ineffective in certain areas due to lacking size, but if he makes up for it in other areas then he should be selected. If he can't compensate with speed, linking, etc then he isn't selected.
NZ selectors get that, but it appears SA really don't. And then they wonder why they can't keep up with our pace!
Saturday isn't much guide. Fly across the world to play with a well beaten side? Marx is the best hooker in the competition, but would you have spotted that on Saturday?
Is that you Mr Monkley?
-
@chester-draws Marx won turnover ball and scored a decent try. Threw well also. So yes you could see the quality is there. Kwagga on the other hand looked out of his depth and easily handled.
-
-
@stargazer said in 2018 Rugby Championship:
Arrggghhh, I just opened a click-bait article from Rattue about which current ABs won't make the RWC in his opinion. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
You have to respect the guy. He was right on the money about Carter and McCaw being past it. Wasn’t he?
-
@billy-tell his memory possibly didnt extend back that far...he had been calling thier careers over well before the 2015 RWC.
Am sure he will get it right one day if he keeps regurgitating the same shit.
-
Although it makes me a bit shy it's worth sharing a video panel I jumped on for 3 Blokes A Ball and Bod which was previewing the Rugby Championship.
The style is pretty relaxed but it was good fun to do and hopefully a decent watch.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1825561960891383&id=725046810942909
-
@davesofthunder I was surprised Reenan (sp?) stand up for Jantjies - I thought every African rugby lover wanted him nowhere near a Springbok jersey.
-
Rugby Championship set for shake-up and Bledisloe Cup boost
Fairfax Media understands SANZAAR will look to move away from the fixed schedule that has been in place since 2012 and consider options that will give the four-nations competition a different feel each year. The shake-up, considered as part of the 2021 broadcast deal talks, could break up the first two Bledisloe Cup fixtures which, in an era of All Blacks dominance, have led to a sharp drop-off in interest from Australian fans early in the competition. But it could also placate an increasingly discontented South Africa who, under the current format, shoulder the bulk of the travel demands. The Springboks play three consecutive Tests on the road each year, the most of any of the four nations. Australia, Argentina and New Zealand each play two Tests away, but the All Blacks are the only nation to host three home games in a row.This doesn't sound appealing:
The "SANZAAR 2030 strategy" paper addressed the issue, raising the prospect of rotating home double-header matches against a single nation. That format might see the Wallabies host two Tests against South Africa, then play two Tests away against Argentina one year, before swapping the next year. It would not break up the Bledisloe Cup fixtures but it might delay them until later in the tournament. -
@stargazer dumb...reduce it to one game, home and away on alternating years.
-
@taniwharugby I wonder why it's always Bledisloe I in Oz, and II in NZ? Surely, they could turn that around? And why always the ABs having their home games first? They could mix it up by finishing their two last games in NZ every second year. Won't change the travel, but it's still a change. And why do SA have three consecutive games on the road? Obviously, they have to combine the away games against NZ and Oz, but is Argentina necessary (travelwise)?
