All Blacks v France Test #2
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
-
@tordah said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Does a HIA fail automatically mean he's concussed?
Yes. He has to pass one this week, before he can play again.
-
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
-
@antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
DMac at five-eighth, so technically it's still an even game.
And it will be claimed by media that he is capable of playing 10 for the ABs because they’ve had a comfortable win.
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
No idea. That's the point.
-
@baron-silas-greenback I think there are tests tomorrow and again on Monday and Tuesday whether he passes tomorrow's or not
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
In basketball we call it tunnelling. It is a cardinal sin to attack the guy when he is jumping in the air
-
@tordah said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
they tried the same move as in the WC final 2011 but O Franks is just a terrible ball runner
Also the front pod didn't take out the french defenders like in that final. Close the gap!!
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
Irrelevant. Ben Smith pulled out of a contest last weekend because he did what Fall should have done. Checked his path while looking to contest the ball. Had he done it for a split second, he could have checked his run and smashed Beaudy when he landed.
-
-
@kev said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@gunner DMAC has chosen to run lines for himself the first two touches, rather than distribute.
He's not a five-eighth's arse.
-
Why call him Jordan Barrett Mr Marshall, or if we are using birth names, Justina
-
Haha go quick tap, pass to the slow whitelock, barrett falls over, turnover.
Both teams know this game is a foregone conclusion
-
-
