Springboks v All Blacks
-
@tewaio said in Springboks v All Blacks:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks v All Blacks:
In spite of the lineout debacle last time, I thought Karl Marx was pretty damn impressive. Showed it tonight. Boks pack in general was very good. Incredible defence and commitment.
He was especially strong down the left wing..
Some would say he defined that position
-
The Boks were great yesterday and I was impressed by their big ball carriers : Marx, Kitshoff and Etzebeth. But how many try opportunities did they have apart from the ones they converted ? None actually. The ABs did not have to make try saving tackles. Most of the SA carries were in the middle of the field, very rarely near the ABs try-line.
I also liked their commitment in the rucks. But was it legal ? I tend to thing that with another referee, it could have been a different story.
I think Sam Cane let them get too much momentum by missing a few tackles. He had his worst game in black for a while.
Liam Squire was the only NZ forward to drive efficiently, consistantly winning the collision area. With the type of game the Spingboks play, the ABs should have fielded a Nr.6 on the bench instead of a Nr.7. The play stayed in midfield for most of the game and seldom reached the wings, at least on the Boks side. This may sound weird but this is an option the ABs should look at the next time they play the Boks. -
@bones said in Springboks v All Blacks:
@98blueandgold @Nepia you guys say Dubs turnovers are others fault...I see them as poor options/carries by Dub.
Anyone got the stats on turnovers? From watching it live, it seemed to me that SBW turned the ball over about as much as DMac (who most think had a motm performance).
-
@cgrant said in Springboks v All Blacks:
But how many try opportunities did they have apart from the ones they converted ? None actually.
I agree completely with the theme, but to be fair DMac's tackle on Cronje towards end of first half was try saving.
-
-
Warning for Bok centre De Allende
The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee issued a warning to Springbok centre Damian de Allende after he was red carded against New Zealand. De Allende was issued a red card for a breach of Law10.4(o) "Late charging the kicker" in their Rugby Championship match at Newlands. However the Foul Play Review Committee found that the offence did not warrant a red card in all the circumstances and has issued a warning. SANZAAR Judicial Rule 7.4 states: "The Foul Play Review Committee may issue a Warning to a Player who has been cited or sent off if in the opinion of the Foul Play Review Committee the act of Foul Play came close to but did not warrant the Player receiving a red card in circumstances where the Player did not receive a yellow card for the act of Foul Play during the Match.” The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee of Nigel Hampton QC (Chairman), Stefan Terblanche and John Langford assessed the case. In his finding, Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Nigel Hampton QC ruled the following: "Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles, as well as submissions from his legal representative, Attie Heyns, the Foul Play Review Committee found that, on an objective study, and with more time and video angles than the Referee had available to him, the act of foul play committed only came close to warranting a Red Card, and therefore a Warning (equivalent to a Yellow Card) was issued instead." "The charge was late and the player had time to pull out before colliding with his opponent. However, the collision was not effected with a great deal of force, with the initial contact being made with the player's forearm on the opponent's chest, from whence the arm rose up to make contact, again not forceful, onto the opponent's neck. The opponent was not injured." "The player is therefore free to play and will serve no suspension” All SANZAAR disciplinary matters are in the first instance referred to the Foul Play Review Committee to provide the option of expediting the judicial process. For a matter to be dispensed with at this hearing, the person appearing must plead guilty and accept the penalty offered by the Foul Play Review Committee. -
There we go. It was worth a YC as most us thought. RC was a bit harsh. Main thing though is it might have cost the Boks the match.
-
@billy-tell Was harsh but it had no material impact as there was only four minutes left so it was no different to a yellow. I personally thought that it shouldn't even have been a penalty but the game has gone ultra soft these days and every little thing is deemed to be foul play.
-
@bones said in Springboks v All Blacks:
@mimic I guess the flip side to that is DMac had a rather better highlights reel. I only recall one glaring turnover from him.
Hell yeah. I was resigned to the Bokke scoring in that situation thinking DMac was going to be pushed off easily. When he not only affected the tackle but somehow stole the ball away as well I was very impressed.
-
@tewaio said in Springboks v All Blacks:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks v All Blacks:
In spite of the lineout debacle last time, I thought Karl Marx was pretty damn impressive. Showed it tonight. Boks pack in general was very good. Incredible defence and commitment.
He was especially strong down the left wing..
Marx was especially effective at redistribution whenever he went over the ball.
-
Interesting analysis: http://www.planetrugby.com/news/372787/
-
@pakman said in Springboks v All Blacks:
Interesting analysis: http://www.planetrugby.com/news/372787/
Funny how in all of those clips they didn't pick p the obvious which was that SA targeted running at A Smith. Nugget may eventually make the tackle but invariably he is hanging on the ankles and the ground has been gained.
ABs will need to adjust their system as it isn't even necessary for the halfback to be defending fringes in general play. No reason he can't adapt to defending further out.
