• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks v All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
235 Posts 46 Posters 21.2k Views
Springboks v All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by Chris B.
    #213

    On the goalpost pads - I'm surprised coaches aren't specifically targeting scoring against them. Work a few rucks towards them and then it's very hard to defend against from close range.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #214

    I'm thinking Operation RWC 2019 might just see "Project Youth" in the back 3: Ioane, Barrett Jnr, DMac, Havili + old man Smith for a wise head and calmness under pressure.

    Should be worried:
    *Dagg - cannot match the others for pace
    *Sopoaga - it's not hard to see DMac becoming the 10/15 supersub bench option (can't see DMac holding out Smith and Barrett Jnr for the starting FB role for the moment, but we see)

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #215

    I don't mind the idea of using an American-style goal set back from the line, but the physics of bringing the crossbar to the tryline are nigh-impossible unless your ingoal is very skinny

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #216

    @billy-tell On "current form," I think you'd lock Ben Smith and Ioane into the squad.

    But if they stick with the same structure as last time, then I think Sopoaga is sitting pretty as the second option at 1st five. DMac (if he can genuinely play first-five) has the possibility to nail the (third) first five utility role that Barrett and Slade filled.

    In which case, last time they only took four outside backs - so just two slots to be fought out between Dagg, NMS, Naholo, Jordie, Jules, Havili, Tamanivalu and anyone else I'm overlooking or thinks they're a shot.

    There will be some good players today, who are going to miss out.

    http://www.allblacks.com/News/27934/all-blacks-squad-for-rwc-2015-announced

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #217

    @98blueandgold @Nepia you guys say Dubs turnovers are others fault...I see them as poor options/carries by Dub.

    mimicM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #218

    Few random thoughts: Great test! Wonderful to see Bokke give us heaps! But:

    Forwards lacked close in go forward until Ofa and Crockett came one. Hames had a good game, but he and Laulala didn't add any carrying. Coles seems a little of the pace. Perhaps accentuated by last two opponents being Marx and Creevy (both excellent). Think we missed having a power lock. Whitelock not really a TH scrummager. Barrett and him seemed to lose out in loose to De Jaeger and Bruno, who was excellent, almost BBBR-like. Cane not so effective in loose, but he made numerous tackles tidying up in the 10-12 channel after Boks (esp. Serfontein) strolled through. Our midfield again didn't gel. SBW was tidy, but seems to have lost his mojo for the magic which used to be a game-opener. And Crotty also tidy but between them didn't seem to be asking many questions. Our back three (all that played there) excellent. And a word for Lima, who's goalkicking was a key reason we won.

    On Bok side, thought their tight five shaded ours other than in scrums, where Dreyer ran into a ref who kept him honest. Kitshoff was immense in tight and loose. Pollard needs to be on the field for longer as his ability in tight spaces is streets ahead of Jantjies. Boks back three very mediocre. Biggest point of difference yesterday.

    Strikes me the travel may have knocked the Blacks back a notch or two. Thought the impetus provided by our bench was a big part in getting the job done.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #219

    SBW has been solid at best all season. I wish they would give Laumape another shot, maybe the dead Bledisloe rubber?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #220

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks v All Blacks:

    In spite of the lineout debacle last time, I thought Karl Marx was pretty damn impressive. Showed it tonight. Boks pack in general was very good. Incredible defence and commitment.

    He was especially strong down the left wing..

    canefanC boobooB T D 4 Replies Last reply
    9
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to TeWaio on last edited by
    #221

    @tewaio said in Springboks v All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks v All Blacks:

    In spite of the lineout debacle last time, I thought Karl Marx was pretty damn impressive. Showed it tonight. Boks pack in general was very good. Incredible defence and commitment.

    He was especially strong down the left wing..

    Some would say he defined that position

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to TeWaio on last edited by
    #222
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #223

    The Boks were great yesterday and I was impressed by their big ball carriers : Marx, Kitshoff and Etzebeth. But how many try opportunities did they have apart from the ones they converted ? None actually. The ABs did not have to make try saving tackles. Most of the SA carries were in the middle of the field, very rarely near the ABs try-line.
    I also liked their commitment in the rucks. But was it legal ? I tend to thing that with another referee, it could have been a different story.
    I think Sam Cane let them get too much momentum by missing a few tackles. He had his worst game in black for a while.
    Liam Squire was the only NZ forward to drive efficiently, consistantly winning the collision area. With the type of game the Spingboks play, the ABs should have fielded a Nr.6 on the bench instead of a Nr.7. The play stayed in midfield for most of the game and seldom reached the wings, at least on the Boks side. This may sound weird but this is an option the ABs should look at the next time they play the Boks.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    replied to Bones on last edited by mimic
    #224

    @bones said in Springboks v All Blacks:

    @98blueandgold @Nepia you guys say Dubs turnovers are others fault...I see them as poor options/carries by Dub.

    Anyone got the stats on turnovers? From watching it live, it seemed to me that SBW turned the ball over about as much as DMac (who most think had a motm performance).

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #225

    @cgrant said in Springboks v All Blacks:

    But how many try opportunities did they have apart from the ones they converted ? None actually.

    I agree completely with the theme, but to be fair DMac's tackle on Cronje towards end of first half was try saving.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to mimic on last edited by
    #226

    @mimic I guess the flip side to that is DMac had a rather better highlights reel. I only recall one glaring turnover from him.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #227

    Warning for Bok centre De Allende

    The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee issued a warning to Springbok centre Damian de Allende after he was red carded against New Zealand.
    
    De Allende was issued a red card for a breach of Law10.4(o) "Late charging the kicker" in their Rugby Championship match at Newlands.
    
    However the Foul Play Review Committee found that the offence did not warrant a red card in all the circumstances and has issued a warning.
    
    SANZAAR Judicial Rule 7.4 states:
    "The Foul Play Review Committee may issue a Warning to a Player who has been cited or sent off if in the opinion of the Foul Play Review Committee the act of Foul Play came close to but did not warrant the Player receiving a red card in circumstances where the Player did not receive a yellow card for the act of Foul Play during the Match.”
    
    The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee of Nigel Hampton QC (Chairman), Stefan Terblanche and John Langford assessed the case.
    
    In his finding, Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Nigel Hampton QC ruled the following:
    
    "Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles, as well as submissions from his legal representative, Attie Heyns, the Foul Play Review Committee found that, on an objective study, and with more time and video angles than the Referee had available to him, the act of foul play committed only came close to warranting a Red Card, and therefore a Warning (equivalent to a Yellow Card) was issued instead."
    
    "The charge was late and the player had time to pull out before colliding with his opponent. However, the collision was not effected with a great deal of force, with the initial contact being made with the player's forearm on the opponent's chest, from whence the arm rose up to make contact, again not forceful, onto the opponent's neck. The opponent was not injured."
    
    "The player is therefore free to play and will serve no suspension”
    
    All SANZAAR disciplinary matters are in the first instance referred to the Foul Play Review Committee to provide the option of expediting the judicial process.
    
    For a matter to be dispensed with at this hearing, the person appearing must plead guilty and accept the penalty offered by the Foul Play Review Committee.
    
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #228

    There we go. It was worth a YC as most us thought. RC was a bit harsh. Main thing though is it might have cost the Boks the match.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by akan004
    #229

    @billy-tell Was harsh but it had no material impact as there was only four minutes left so it was no different to a yellow. I personally thought that it shouldn't even have been a penalty but the game has gone ultra soft these days and every little thing is deemed to be foul play.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bones on last edited by Crucial
    #230

    @bones said in Springboks v All Blacks:

    @mimic I guess the flip side to that is DMac had a rather better highlights reel. I only recall one glaring turnover from him.

    Hell yeah. I was resigned to the Bokke scoring in that situation thinking DMac was going to be pushed off easily. When he not only affected the tackle but somehow stole the ball away as well I was very impressed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Tregaskis
    replied to TeWaio on last edited by
    #231

    @tewaio said in Springboks v All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks v All Blacks:

    In spite of the lineout debacle last time, I thought Karl Marx was pretty damn impressive. Showed it tonight. Boks pack in general was very good. Incredible defence and commitment.

    He was especially strong down the left wing..

    Marx was especially effective at redistribution whenever he went over the ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #232

    Changing sheds video captures the esteem the two teams hold each other in:

    Is that Hames and Dreyer discussing in the background whether or not Garces's parents are married?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

Springboks v All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.