Aussie Cricket
-
303/4 - Safe to say advantage India for the first day's play.
-
-
@SynicBast said in Aussie Cricket:
Pleased to see Pujara make more runs - understated batsman - all Test Class, all test temperament, just a machine.
He's a more important wicket than Kohli
-
-
-
@Siam said in Aussie Cricket:
@Hooroo least performing cricketer in his marriage...
ok.. I dont get it.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Aussie Cricket:
@Siam said in Aussie Cricket:
@Hooroo least performing cricketer in his marriage...
ok.. I dont get it.
Married to Alyssa Healy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyssa_Healy
-
@Donsteppa said in Aussie Cricket:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Aussie Cricket:
@Siam said in Aussie Cricket:
@Hooroo least performing cricketer in his marriage...
ok.. I dont get it.
Married to Alyssa Healy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyssa_Healy
Oh right chick 'cricket', no wonder I didnt know.
-
-
@Hooroo said in Aussie Cricket:
That is a really bad decision isn't it? There was a gap between ball and bat when snicko was registering???
I think it's correct. The end on camera shot is missing the frame where it tickles the bat. We have the frame just before and after. The other camera angles and snicko is enough
-
512/6
Pant with a century and no signs India are interested in fielding.
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Cricket:
512/6
Pant with a century and no signs India are interested in fielding.
So much for the Australian bowlers being their strength ( to make up for the poor batting lineup)
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Cricket:
512/6
Pant with a century and no signs India are interested in fielding.
Reminds me of the Steve Waugh/Mark Taylor days when you'd just assume they'd declare in the wvening session but they'd bat on the next morning and rack up 600-650 and still win easy.
Just demoralise them.
-
622/7d
Australia to face 10 overs before stumps
