Aussie Cricket
-
-
@Siam said in Aussie Cricket:
@Hooroo least performing cricketer in his marriage...
ok.. I dont get it.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Aussie Cricket:
@Siam said in Aussie Cricket:
@Hooroo least performing cricketer in his marriage...
ok.. I dont get it.
Married to Alyssa Healy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyssa_Healy
-
@Donsteppa said in Aussie Cricket:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Aussie Cricket:
@Siam said in Aussie Cricket:
@Hooroo least performing cricketer in his marriage...
ok.. I dont get it.
Married to Alyssa Healy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyssa_Healy
Oh right chick 'cricket', no wonder I didnt know.
-
-
@Hooroo said in Aussie Cricket:
That is a really bad decision isn't it? There was a gap between ball and bat when snicko was registering???
I think it's correct. The end on camera shot is missing the frame where it tickles the bat. We have the frame just before and after. The other camera angles and snicko is enough
-
512/6
Pant with a century and no signs India are interested in fielding.
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Cricket:
512/6
Pant with a century and no signs India are interested in fielding.
So much for the Australian bowlers being their strength ( to make up for the poor batting lineup)
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Cricket:
512/6
Pant with a century and no signs India are interested in fielding.
Reminds me of the Steve Waugh/Mark Taylor days when you'd just assume they'd declare in the wvening session but they'd bat on the next morning and rack up 600-650 and still win easy.
Just demoralise them.
-
622/7d
Australia to face 10 overs before stumps
-
-
Should've had The Waj for a duck, but Pant was a bit tired from his batting and grassed a pretty regulation caught behind - which might have put panic in the ranks.
Warnie is suggesting the only way Oz win is to declare 199 behind and hope Kohli will set them a target (or maybe they can bowl India out in two sessions).
I think the horse has bolted.
Winning 3-1 would be nice, but 2-1 will be fine.
-
-
@MajorRage said in Aussie Cricket:
@Chris-B you have to admire Aussie optimism.
When the opposition scores 622, there is no winning option. None whatsoever
Especially not given this batting lineup. They are poked, and their commentators are delusional
-
@Chris-B said in Aussie Cricket:
Should've had The Waj for a duck, but Pant was a bit tired from his batting and grassed a pretty regulation caught behind - which might have put panic in the ranks.
Warnie is suggesting the only way Oz win is to declare 199 behind and hope Kohli will set them a target (or maybe they can bowl India out in two sessions).
I think the horse has bolted.
Winning 3-1 would be nice, but 2-1 will be fine.
You think they're capable of avoiding the follow on? ie, Can they score 423?
Do you reckon India would bother with setting a target?
My answers:
- probably not
- no way in hell
-
@booboo said in Aussie Cricket:
@Chris-B said in Aussie Cricket:
Should've had The Waj for a duck, but Pant was a bit tired from his batting and grassed a pretty regulation caught behind - which might have put panic in the ranks.
Warnie is suggesting the only way Oz win is to declare 199 behind and hope Kohli will set them a target (or maybe they can bowl India out in two sessions).
I think the horse has bolted.
Winning 3-1 would be nice, but 2-1 will be fine.
You think they're capable of avoiding the follow on? ie, Can they score 423?
Do you reckon India would bother with setting a target?
My answers:
- probably not
- no way in hell
2 shows. Shit and no.
When you are 2-1 up over the Aussies in a series, in Aussie ...
