• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby - The Future

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
378 Posts 45 Posters 18.6k Views
Super Rugby - The Future
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #343

    @KiwiMurph I think if you have a season this long we should go straight into the semis.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #344

    @nostrildamus said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    A comp based on continents would be interesting, Europe could divide into 2 or 3, and N America could be competitive...

    Then you'd need a 7s type end with cup, plate etc. to keep the interest when inevitably there's three NZ teams and the Brumbies in the semis.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #345

    Rugby Direct podcast talks to Super Rugby Pacific board chair Kevin Malloy:

    ZB

    Rugby Direct: Reviewing the semi-finals and Super Rugby Pacific board chair Kevin Malloy discuss the future of the competition

    Rugby Direct: Reviewing the semi-finals and Super Rugby Pacific board chair Kevin Malloy discuss the future of the competition

    This week on Rugby Direct, Elliott Smith and Liam Napier review the Super Rugby semi-finals as the Blues and Chiefs advance to Saturday night's decider, at

    WingerW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to ruggabee on last edited by Winger
    #346

    @ruggabee said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @Machpants said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @Machpants said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @Chris said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @Chris so is that an 18 round regular season if you factor in 2 byes?

    It would have to be to make it work, not locked in the preferred version so I hear probably will end up being tweaked maybe to 5 teams played twice to pull back the weeks they can fit in.
    They are keen to start the comp a week earlier than normal.

    Why do you need byes with 11 teams, fuck that. Not required, rotate if required

    The byes aren't in addition to the forced bye.

    With an 11 team league every team with have at least one bye every 11 weeks.

    That's enough

    If you have more than an 11 week regular season you have to have multiple byes with an 11 team comp in order for teams to play the same number of games.

    and that's why I have a real gripe with the Rebels getting dissolved by moronic ARU, 1 step forwards - 2 steps back...

    Aust finally make a good decision

    It was a must-make decision. They really can only afford and have enough depth for 3 teams but 4 is much better than 5

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #347

    @Tim said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    Rugby Direct podcast talks to Super Rugby Pacific board chair Kevin Malloy:

    ZB

    Rugby Direct: Reviewing the semi-finals and Super Rugby Pacific board chair Kevin Malloy discuss the future of the competition

    Rugby Direct: Reviewing the semi-finals and Super Rugby Pacific board chair Kevin Malloy discuss the future of the competition

    This week on Rugby Direct, Elliott Smith and Liam Napier review the Super Rugby semi-finals as the Blues and Chiefs advance to Saturday night's decider, at

    Stopped listening to Elliott Smith and Liam Napier.

    But Kevin was good,

    I thought Jack was already on Board but surely rugby interviewer should know.

    Its July 22nd so getting close

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by Canes4life
    #348

    There's been recent discussion about All Blacks playing for Aussie Super sides and Wallabies playing for NZ Super sides to try and make Super Rugby more appealing as a whole. Imagine Ardie Savea playing for the Reds or Rob Valetini playing for the Canes. Would a competition structure that allows players to move to any Super team but still be eligible for their international side work?

    There would obviously be many flaws to this from an AB perspective as we have stronger players, but this would be one way to make teams more even and improve the competition as a whole (from an Aussie perspective). If you kept Super Rugby to just Aus/NZ teams then you could even incorporate a transfer/draft structure similar to the NBA/NFL etc. Food for thought indeed.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by Tim
    #349
    Super Rugby, Rugby, Sport

    Gregor Paul: The only viable country for Super Rugby expansion

    Gregor Paul: The only viable country for Super Rugby expansion

    OPINION: Super Rugby is at a crossroads over whether to reduce or expand club numbers.

    And of all the clubs battling financial headwinds, none have been more challenged than Moana Pasifika, who have yet to find a home base and build a dedicated following and therefore have been deemed to be carrying a high degree of financial vulnerability.

    But the Herald can reveal that Moana have secured their future by striking a significant deal with a new financial partner.

    The club have confirmed that the new partnership has given them long-term security, and with that, they can now offer prospective new players the certainty they need to join Moana.

    IIRC they named a health insurance company, but edited it out?

    EDIT:

    Here it is:

    But the Herald can reveal that Moana have secured their future by striking a significant deal with a new financial partner – believed to be South Seas Healthcare, or trustees of South Seas Healthcare.

    https://archive.is/8R6t2

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #350

    @Canes4life said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    There's been recent discussion about All Blacks playing for Aussie Super sides and Wallabies playing for NZ Super sides to try and make Super Rugby more appealing as a whole. Imagine Ardie Savea playing for the Reds or Rob Valetini playing for the Canes.

    Barely any of our guys would make a first XV over there. They've been brought up on 8-10 schoolboys games a year max, followed by an academy system narrower than a goat track. There's a reason we lose the physical battles: our development systems are shit.

    Going to 3 teams won't change that.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #351

    @NTA said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @Canes4life said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    There's been recent discussion about All Blacks playing for Aussie Super sides and Wallabies playing for NZ Super sides to try and make Super Rugby more appealing as a whole. Imagine Ardie Savea playing for the Reds or Rob Valetini playing for the Canes.

    Barely any of our guys would make a first XV over there. They've been brought up on 8-10 schoolboys games a year max, followed by an academy system narrower than a goat track. There's a reason we lose the physical battles: our development systems are shit.

    Going to 3 teams won't change that.

    Maybe the Aussie teams go down to two teams then. 😃

    We need to find a way of making all teams more even though otherwise it will just be the same five or six sides competing for the playoffs every year which will get boring in the long run.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #352

    @Canes4life it is diminishing returns. The effect of dropping pro teams here is less TV money.

    Drop in TV money = drop in investment = drop in talent development = drop in competitiveness = calls for another team to be dropped. Rewind, play, stop, rewind, play, stop etc.

    Might as well just kick us out and be done with it if that is the answer 🤷♂

    It isn't of course - the investment of whatever money rugby has here needs to be better directed, and our entire system needs bringing out of the 80s.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #353

    @NTA said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    @Canes4life it is diminishing returns. The effect of dropping pro teams here is less TV money.

    Drop in TV money = drop in investment = drop in talent development = drop in competitiveness = calls for another team to be dropped. Rewind, play, stop, rewind, play, stop etc.

    Might as well just kick us out and be done with it if that is the answer 🤷♂

    It isn't of course - the investment of whatever money rugby has here needs to be better directed, and our entire system needs bringing out of the 80s.

    Yeah I don't know what the answer is here but Aus rugby really needs to be more competitive, otherwise Super Rugby will never improve.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #354

    In terms of next steps for Kevan Malloy’s Super Rugby commission, Hore has confidence in a viable 11-team draw providing a post-Melbourne solution next year (with an extra derby game to sweeten the pot), but challenges are plentiful.

    The Post
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #355

    A good weekend for Super Rugby

    ABs, Wallabies, Samoa and Fiji all won

    Daffy JaffyD 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #356

    @KiwiMurph
    With Georgian comms. An interesting Yellow only call at 6:10 mins -

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogz
    wrote on last edited by mikedogz
    #357

    Japan Rugby League One executive Hajime Shoji outlines what they want from Super Rugby, and what they don’t

    The Post
    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to mikedogz on last edited by
    #358

    @mikedogz paywalled

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogz
    wrote on last edited by mikedogz
    #359
    • JRLO is a growth league, with last season’s final drawing 56,486 fans.

    • Super Rugby’s longer-term structure remains unclear.

    • Kiwi Super sides won’t play in Japan in 2025.

    The All Blacks play Japan this weekend in the latest chapter of a deepening rugby relationship between the two countries, but a potential merged competition between Super Rugby Pacific and Japan Rugby League One remains some distance off.

    Super Rugby Pacific chief executive Jack Mesley is currently working on a strategy for 2026 onwards, telling The Post last month that he had an “open mind” to new teams.

    Japan has often been mentioned as the natural next step for Super Rugby, although that is based on the premise that the Japanese are as keen as New Zealand and Australia.

    However, in an interview with The Post, JRLO chief operating officer Hajime Shoji has outlined a more nuanced but firm position, stating that Japan first wanted post-season playoff games of real consequence before any moves towards a potential merger.

    “The meaning of the game is the most important [thing], just an exchange is not enough,” Shoji said, referring to the Blues and Chiefs’ preseason fixtures in February.

    “In our long-term horizon, it’s how to realise the value of the game, especially for the competition level and the fans’ enthusiasm.

    “So, some formality for the game is quite important.

    “And of course, commercial success or commercial performance is also very important.

    “Once we can have a meaningful format for the game many Japanese corporations, especially who have business in Australia and New Zealand, have a good appetite to support us.”

    The Blues and Chiefs played in what was marketed as “Cross-Border Rugby” before Super Rugby and while Shoji said the concept was “quite successful” as relationship-building exercises, they lacked true meaning for both countries.

    Only one of the four games in Cross-Border Rugby truly caught the eye - when Robbie Deans put out a full-strength Saitama Wild Knights to play, and beat, the Chiefs - and there will be no repeat in 2025.

    Beauden Barrett in action for Suntory Sungoliath in Japan’s domestic rugby competition.

    The preferred option for JRLO is to have a formalised competition at the end of Super Rugby Pacific and Japan’s domestic competition, when sides from all countries would have access to their test players.

    “We are keeping the discussion [open] for our future collaboration,” Shoji said.

    “We are discussing the many options for the cross border format, for our mutual benefit.

    “It’s still under negotiation so I cannot talk [about it] much, but basically one of the option is integrated type of playoffs after each [domestic] playoff.

    “And another option is having the some games in the midst of the season [in Japan].

    “We have some preference but our discussion is based on mutual benefit.”

    JRLO’s negotiating position - essentially a form of stick and carrot - reflects the growing self-confidence of a league that is growing its fanbase.

    Last season’s final between Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo, coached by Todd Blackadder, and the Saitama Wild Knights attracted a crowd of 56,486 in late May, which was more than the Japan-England test match in June.

    Blackadder and Deans have been joined by Ian Foster, Dave Rennie, Kieran Crowley, Tabai Matson, Glenn Delaney and Wayne Pivac in the coaching ranks in Japan, lifting the competition’s rugby IQ in a big way.

    The All Blacks enjoy support and recognition in Japan but Super Rugby is a different matter.
    Tsutomu Kishimoto
    As a result, players such as Beauden Barrett - who has featured for both Suntory Sungoliath and Toyota Verblitz in JRLO - have called for NZ Rugby to pull out the stops to make the top Japanese sides a full part of Super Rugby.

    Shoji did not rule that out at some point in the future but said a lot more groundwork was needed before that became compelling for the Japanese.

    “That has to take some steps, because all integrated types of models firstly need the fans’ understanding,” he said.

    “Japanese fans, at least at this moment, don't understand the structure or history of Super Rugby well.

    “And in that [potential] integration of the league, it [will] have some challenge to get the understanding from Japanese fans.

    “And of course the second reason is... the cost effectiveness, or financial feasibility.

    “Of course, the cost of moving to each place is quite big.

    “Therefore, for these two reasons, we need to take some steps, at least, before we are moving to some integration.”

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #360

    I have to ask what "post-season playoff games of real consequence" actually means....the only thing they can do it make a new trophy (pacific club champ)...and is another new trophy really going to mean much to anyone...especially if one day they are combined into one comp

    W 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    darylmitchell
    replied to mikedogz on last edited by darylmitchell
    #361

    @mikedogz said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    • JRLO is a growth league, with last season’s final drawing 56,486 fans.

    • Super Rugby’s longer-term structure remains unclear.

    • Kiwi Super sides won’t play in Japan in 2025.

    The All Blacks play Japan this weekend in the latest chapter of a deepening rugby relationship between the two countries, but a potential merged competition between Super Rugby Pacific and Japan Rugby League One remains some distance off.

    Super Rugby Pacific chief executive Jack Mesley is currently working on a strategy for 2026 onwards, telling The Post last month that he had an “open mind” to new teams.

    Japan has often been mentioned as the natural next step for Super Rugby, although that is based on the premise that the Japanese are as keen as New Zealand and Australia.

    However, in an interview with The Post, JRLO chief operating officer Hajime Shoji has outlined a more nuanced but firm position, stating that Japan first wanted post-season playoff games of real consequence before any moves towards a potential merger.

    “The meaning of the game is the most important [thing], just an exchange is not enough,” Shoji said, referring to the Blues and Chiefs’ preseason fixtures in February.

    “In our long-term horizon, it’s how to realise the value of the game, especially for the competition level and the fans’ enthusiasm.

    “So, some formality for the game is quite important.

    “And of course, commercial success or commercial performance is also very important.

    “Once we can have a meaningful format for the game many Japanese corporations, especially who have business in Australia and New Zealand, have a good appetite to support us.”

    The Blues and Chiefs played in what was marketed as “Cross-Border Rugby” before Super Rugby and while Shoji said the concept was “quite successful” as relationship-building exercises, they lacked true meaning for both countries.

    Only one of the four games in Cross-Border Rugby truly caught the eye - when Robbie Deans put out a full-strength Saitama Wild Knights to play, and beat, the Chiefs - and there will be no repeat in 2025.

    Beauden Barrett in action for Suntory Sungoliath in Japan’s domestic rugby competition.

    The preferred option for JRLO is to have a formalised competition at the end of Super Rugby Pacific and Japan’s domestic competition, when sides from all countries would have access to their test players.

    “We are keeping the discussion [open] for our future collaboration,” Shoji said.

    “We are discussing the many options for the cross border format, for our mutual benefit.

    “It’s still under negotiation so I cannot talk [about it] much, but basically one of the option is integrated type of playoffs after each [domestic] playoff.

    “And another option is having the some games in the midst of the season [in Japan].

    “We have some preference but our discussion is based on mutual benefit.”

    JRLO’s negotiating position - essentially a form of stick and carrot - reflects the growing self-confidence of a league that is growing its fanbase.

    Last season’s final between Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo, coached by Todd Blackadder, and the Saitama Wild Knights attracted a crowd of 56,486 in late May, which was more than the Japan-England test match in June.

    Blackadder and Deans have been joined by Ian Foster, Dave Rennie, Kieran Crowley, Tabai Matson, Glenn Delaney and Wayne Pivac in the coaching ranks in Japan, lifting the competition’s rugby IQ in a big way.

    The All Blacks enjoy support and recognition in Japan but Super Rugby is a different matter.
    Tsutomu Kishimoto
    As a result, players such as Beauden Barrett - who has featured for both Suntory Sungoliath and Toyota Verblitz in JRLO - have called for NZ Rugby to pull out the stops to make the top Japanese sides a full part of Super Rugby.

    Shoji did not rule that out at some point in the future but said a lot more groundwork was needed before that became compelling for the Japanese.

    “That has to take some steps, because all integrated types of models firstly need the fans’ understanding,” he said.

    “Japanese fans, at least at this moment, don't understand the structure or history of Super Rugby well.

    “And in that [potential] integration of the league, it [will] have some challenge to get the understanding from Japanese fans.

    “And of course the second reason is... the cost effectiveness, or financial feasibility.

    “Of course, the cost of moving to each place is quite big.

    “Therefore, for these two reasons, we need to take some steps, at least, before we are moving to some integration.”

    So to summarize... nothing will happen because this would mean more Super games and NZR only cares about preserving the players for international duties.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    WoodysRFC
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by WoodysRFC
    #362

    @Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby - The Future:

    I have to ask what "post-season playoff games of real consequence" actually means....the only thing they can do it make a new trophy (pacific club champ)...and is another new trophy really going to mean much to anyone...especially if one day they are combined into one comp

    Probably a polite way of implying NZR Super teams halfarsed the cross border games with essentially development sides.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Super Rugby - The Future
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.