Hurricanes vs Chiefs

[African Monkey]

@Frank And he's not going too badly either.

[taniwharugby]

Seems the ABs will be made up of loosies this year huh 🤔

[Tim]

How does Reuben O’Neill keep getting starts over Dyer? Baffling.

[Victor Meldrew]

Chiefs seem to have weathered the storm. Should be more than 4 points down.

[Yeetyaah]

Lomax a mile offside before the Ratima break

[Yeetyaah]

This post is deleted!

[antipodean]

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?

Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.

Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.

It's not an infringement if it isn't called.

I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?

I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.

[Yeetyaah]

Well fuck knows how the Chiefs are still in this but I'll take it. They look very sluggish so my expectations are low.

[Bones]

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?

Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.

Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.

It's not an infringement if it isn't called.

I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?

I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.

So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.

[antipodean]

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?

Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.

Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.

It's not an infringement if it isn't called.

I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?

I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.

So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.

How long have you been watching rugby? Never noticed a team scoring and the commentary saying player X is lucky or otherwise they'd probably be facing a YC? Never seen a ref play advantage until today and decide the appropriate sanction when going back to the original offence?

There's no offence if the ref determines the non-offending team has gained an advantage. There's an entire section in the laws dealing with this.

[African Monkey]

Should have taken 3 Chiefs.

[African Monkey]

Ratima finding things difficult other than his try.

[Yeetyaah]

Did Cortez even touch that?

[Bones]

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?

Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.

Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.

It's not an infringement if it isn't called.

I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?

I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.

So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.

How long have you been watching rugby? Never noticed a team scoring and the commentary saying player X is lucky or otherwise they'd probably be facing a YC? Never seen a ref play advantage until today and decide the appropriate sanction when going back to the original offence?

There's no offence if the ref determines the non-offending team has gained an advantage. There's an entire section in the laws dealing with this.

🤣 I've only been watching for 40 minutes Mr expert. So you've never seen anyone yellow carded for a previous infringement when a try has been scored? How long have you been watching rugby?

[Frank]

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

So you've never seen anyone yellow carded for a previous infringement when a try has been scored?

Pretty sure I have seen that, a lot.

[antipodean]

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?

Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.

Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.

It's not an infringement if it isn't called.

I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?

I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.

So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.

How long have you been watching rugby? Never noticed a team scoring and the commentary saying player X is lucky or otherwise they'd probably be facing a YC? Never seen a ref play advantage until today and decide the appropriate sanction when going back to the original offence?

There's no offence if the ref determines the non-offending team has gained an advantage. There's an entire section in the laws dealing with this.

🤣 I've only been watching for 40 minutes Mr expert. So you've never seen anyone yellow carded for a previous infringement when a try has been scored? How long have you been watching rugby?

Name an instance when someone has been YC for offside when the non-offending team scores a try.

[Tim]

One point game.

[Tim]

Better kick from DMac.

[Mr Fish]

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:

That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?

Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.

Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.

It's not an infringement if it isn't called.

I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?

I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.

So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.

How long have you been watching rugby? Never noticed a team scoring and the commentary saying player X is lucky or otherwise they'd probably be facing a YC? Never seen a ref play advantage until today and decide the appropriate sanction when going back to the original offence?

There's no offence if the ref determines the non-offending team has gained an advantage. There's an entire section in the laws dealing with this.

🤣 I've only been watching for 40 minutes Mr expert. So you've never seen anyone yellow carded for a previous infringement when a try has been scored? How long have you been watching rugby?

Name an instance when someone has been YC for offside when the non-offending team scores a try.

I can't think of specific examples but I've definitely seen this before.

[Duluth]

Chiefs in front. I presume every Chiefs player should be in the ABs now